Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Due process (2)
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Excessive damage awards (2)
- "Bedbug case" (1)
- "Professor Colleen Murphy" (1)
-
- "State Farm v. Campbell" (1)
- "cruel and unusual punishment" sentencing factors (1)
- "personal" versus "proprietary" (1)
- "punitive damages and due process" (1)
- 407 (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (1)
- Alexander Hamilton (1)
- Article III (1)
- Asset based remedies (1)
- BMW v Gore (1)
- Birth control (1)
- Birth control sabotage (1)
- Chapman v. California (1)
- Chevron v Yaiguaje (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1991 (1)
- Civil and criminal penalties (1)
- Conduct (1)
- Constitutional common law (1)
- Constitutional error (1)
- Constitutional protections in criminal sentencing (1)
- Constitutional review for excessiveness (1)
- Constitutionally excessive (1)
- Contractual remedies for financial instruments (1)
- Defects (1)
- Domestic abuse (1)
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
Curbing Remedies For Official Wrongs: The Need For Bivens Suits In National Security Cases, Peter Margulies
Curbing Remedies For Official Wrongs: The Need For Bivens Suits In National Security Cases, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Can Courts Save Us From Unconstitutional Government Conduct?, John M. Greabe
Can Courts Save Us From Unconstitutional Government Conduct?, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
[Excerpt] "We are living in a troubled time. Across the political spectrum, there is a great deal of concern that government officials have been derelict in honoring their oaths to support and defend the Constitution."
You're It: Tag Jurisdiction Over Corporations In Canada, Tanya Monestier
You're It: Tag Jurisdiction Over Corporations In Canada, Tanya Monestier
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Riddle Of Harmless Error Revisited, John M. Greabe
The Riddle Of Harmless Error Revisited, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
Half a century ago, in Chapman v. California, the Supreme Court imposed on appellate courts an obligation to vacate or reverse criminal judgments marred by constitutional error unless the government demonstrates that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. But the Court did not explain the juridical status of this obligation or its relation to the federal harmless-error statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2111. In the intervening years, commentators have struggled to make sense of Chapman. Some see it as a constitutional mandate. Others view it as an example of constitutional common law. In THE RIDDLE OF HARMLESS ERROR, written …
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article responds to the alarm recently sounded by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists over “birth control sabotage”—the “active interference [by one partner] with [the other] partner’s contraceptive methods in an attempt to promote pregnancy.” Currently, sabotage is not a crime, and existing categories of criminal offenses fail to capture the essence of the injury it does to victims. This Article argues that sabotage should be a separate crime—but only when perpetrated against those partners who can and do get pregnant as a result of having sabotaged sex. Using the principle of self-possession—understood as a person’s basic right …
From Feudal Land Contracts To Financial Derivatives: The Treatment Of Status Through Specific Relief, John J. Chung
From Feudal Land Contracts To Financial Derivatives: The Treatment Of Status Through Specific Relief, John J. Chung
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Is Specific About Specific Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
What Is Specific About Specific Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Who Knew? Admissibility Of Subsequent Remedial Measures When Defendants Are Without Knowledge Of The Injuries, Mark G. Boyko, Ryan G. Vacca
Who Knew? Admissibility Of Subsequent Remedial Measures When Defendants Are Without Knowledge Of The Injuries, Mark G. Boyko, Ryan G. Vacca
Law Faculty Scholarship
Federal Rule of Evidence 407 prohibits the introduction of subsequent remedial measures for the purposes of demonstrating negligence, culpable conduct, or product defect. But the rule breaks down, in application and purpose, when a defendant undertakes the new safety measure after the plaintiff's injury, but before the defendant had knowledge of the loss. Such a situation is not uncommon. Would-be defendants frequently improve their products and product safety for a variety of reasons. Toxic exposure cases, where exposure often predates diagnosis of the injury by a decade or more, represent a prime example of cases where defendants are likely to …
Statutory Caps And Judicial Review Of Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Statutory Caps And Judicial Review Of Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Money As A "Specific" Remedy, Colleen P. Murphy
Money As A "Specific" Remedy, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The "Bedbug" Case And State Farm V. Campbell, Colleen P. Murphy
The "Bedbug" Case And State Farm V. Campbell, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Prior Convictions After Apprendi, Colleen P. Murphy
The Use Of Prior Convictions After Apprendi, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Misclassifying Monetary Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
Misclassifying Monetary Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Reviewing Congressionally Created Remedies For Excessiveness, Colleen P. Murphy
Reviewing Congressionally Created Remedies For Excessiveness, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judgement As A Matter Of Law On Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Judgement As A Matter Of Law On Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.