Law | Open Access Articles | Digital Commons Network™

Affordable Care Act, Remedy, And Litigation Reform, The, Brendan Maher Jan 2014

Affordable Care Act, Remedy, And Litigation Reform, The, Brendan Maher

Faculty Articles and Papers

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“ACA”) rewrote the law of private health insurance. How the ACA rewrote the law of civil remedies, however, is — to date — a question largely unexamined by scholars. Courts everywhere, including the United States Supreme Court, will soon confront this important issue. This Article offers a foundational treatment of the ACA on remedy. It predicts a series of flashpoints over which litigation reform battles will be fought. It identifies several themes that will animate those conflicts and trigger others. It explains how judicial construction of the statute’s functional predecessor, the …

Go to article

Unpacking The Employee-Misconduct Defense, Sachin S. Pandya Jul 2012

Unpacking The Employee-Misconduct Defense, Sachin S. Pandya

Faculty Articles and Papers

When a worker sues an employer, the employer sometimes learns thereafter that the worker had committed some misconduct at the time of hire or while on the job. In those cases, most American work laws provide the employer with a defense that precludes employer liability, or at least limits remedies, if the employer shows that, had it known of the worker’s misconduct at the time of its allegedly wrongful act, it would have fired the worker because of that misconduct. This Article evaluates the prevailing arguments for and against the employee-misconduct defense as it appears in the National Labor Relations …

Go to article

Creating A Paternalistic Market For Legal Rules Affecting The Benefit Promise, Brendan Maher Jan 2009

Creating A Paternalistic Market For Legal Rules Affecting The Benefit Promise, Brendan Maher

Faculty Articles and Papers

Notwithstanding the fact that ERISA was enacted to protect employee benefits, courts have narrowly construed the relief available when benefits are denied, out of concern that a stronger remedy would be too costly for the system to bear. Judges, I argue, are ill-equipped to make this policy judgment. Instead, a regulated, subsidized, paternalistic market should be created to permit the benefit players themselves to choose and price the strength of the remedy they desire. This is a superior means to reach the right level of remedial strength for the most players. To protect against undesirably weak remedial options being selected, …

Go to article

Knicks-Heat And The Appropriateness Of Sanctions In Sport, Lewis Kurlantzick Jan 2002