Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Remedies

Selected Works

Selected Works

2013

Remedies

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Public Procurement And Remedies, Emanuela A. Matei Aug 2013

Public Procurement And Remedies, Emanuela A. Matei

Emanuela A. Matei

No abstract provided.

Go to article

In Defense Of Implied Injunctive Relief In Constitutional Cases, John F. Preis Feb 2013

In Defense Of Implied Injunctive Relief In Constitutional Cases, John F. Preis

John F. Preis

If Congress has neither authorized nor prohibited a suit to enforce the Constitution, may the federal courts create one nonetheless? At present, the answer mostly turns on the form of relief sought: if the plaintiff seeks damages, the Supreme Court will normally refuse relief unless Congress has specifically authorized it; in contrast, if the plaintiff seeks an injunction, the Court will refuse relief only if Congress has specifi- cally barred it. These contradictory approaches naturally invite arguments for reform. Two common arguments—one based on the historical relationship between law and equity and the other based on separation of powers principles—could …

Go to article

Remedies - The Law School Course, Doug Rendleman Feb 2013

Remedies - The Law School Course, Doug Rendleman

Doug Rendleman

None available.

Go to article

Remedies: A Guide For The Perplexed, Doug Rendleman Feb 2013

Remedies: A Guide For The Perplexed, Doug Rendleman

Doug Rendleman

Remedies is one of a law student’s most practical courses. Remedies students and their professors learn to work with their eyes on the question at the end of litigation: what can the court do for the successful plaintiff? Remedies develops students’ professional identities and broadens their professional horizons by reorganizing their analysis of procedure, torts, contracts, and property around choosing and measuring relief - compensatory damages, punitive damages, an injunction, specific performance, disgorgement, and restitution. This article discusses the law-school course in Remedies - the content of the Remedies course, the Remedies classroom experience, and Remedies outside the classroom through …

Go to article

Rejecting Property Rules-Liability Rules For Boomer's Nuisance Remedy: The Last Tour You Need Of Calabresi And Melamed's Cathedral, Doug Rendleman Feb 2013

Rejecting Property Rules-Liability Rules For Boomer's Nuisance Remedy: The Last Tour You Need Of Calabresi And Melamed's Cathedral, Doug Rendleman

Doug Rendleman

This draft article analyzes and criticizes the New York court’s tort remedies in its nuisance decision, Boomer v. Atlantic Cement, and Calabresi and Melamed’s famous law-and-economics article, One View of the Cathedral. From the Remedies branch of Legal Realism, this draft finds both wanting because both subordinate the winning plaintiffs’ injunction remedy to money damages. Both the Boomer decision and the Cathedral article undervalue public health and environmental protection. This mindset militates against robust and effective private-law remedies for defendants’ environmental torts. In addition, the Cathedral article’s four-rule organization and vocabulary are confusing and misleading. In particular its Rule 1) …

Go to article

Remedies - The Law School Course, Doug Rendleman Jan 2013

Remedies - The Law School Course, Doug Rendleman

Doug Rendleman

None available.

Go to article

Veil-Piercing Unbound, Peter B. Oh Dec 2012

Veil-Piercing Unbound, Peter B. Oh

Peter B. Oh

Veil-piercing is an equitable remedy. This simple insight has been lost over time. What started as a means for corporate creditors to reach into the personal assets of a shareholder has devolved into a doctrinal black hole. Courts apply an expansive list of amorphous factors, attenuated from the underlying harm, that engenders under-inclusive, unprincipled, and unpredictable results for entrepreneurs, litigants, and scholars alike. Veil-piercing is misapplied because it is misconceived. The orthodox approach is to view veil-piercing as an exception to limited liability that is justified potentially only when the latter is not, a path that invariably leads to examining …

Go to article