Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Best Oral Argument I (N)Ever Made, Judith S. Kaye
The Best Oral Argument I (N)Ever Made, Judith S. Kaye
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
What's The Difference? Comparing The Advocacy Preferences Of State And Federal Appellate Judges, David Lewis
What's The Difference? Comparing The Advocacy Preferences Of State And Federal Appellate Judges, David Lewis
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Common Disorders Of The Appendix And Their Treatment, Roger J. Miner
Common Disorders Of The Appendix And Their Treatment, Roger J. Miner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
In the legal profession, an appendix is an integral part to an appellate brief. An appendix is as important as oral argument or the written brief. This essay examines the function of and rules for preparing an appendix. The discussion then identifies common deficiencies of appendices along with the consequences of the disorders.
Competent Appellate Advocacy And Continuing Legal Education: Fitting The Means To The End, D. Franklin Arey Iii
Competent Appellate Advocacy And Continuing Legal Education: Fitting The Means To The End, D. Franklin Arey Iii
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Competency is an important practice requirement. Appellate competency differs from other legal practices. This article presents CLE programs that promote appellate advocacy.
Rules Of Appellate Advocacy: An Australian Perspective, Michael Kirby
Rules Of Appellate Advocacy: An Australian Perspective, Michael Kirby
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
A justice of Australia's highest court gives advice to appellate advocates. The essay begins with an overview of Australia’s judicial structure. The discussion then focuses on ten rules for appellate advocacy.
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Chief Justice William Rehnquist analyzed the evolution of Supreme Court advocacy. The discussion begins with the initial preference for oral arguments and the influence of nineteenth century Supreme Court advocate Daniel Webster. The discussion then turns to the Court’s shift from more attention to oral argument to written briefs.