Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recovering The Lost General Welfare Clause, David S. Schwartz
Recovering The Lost General Welfare Clause, David S. Schwartz
William & Mary Law Review
The General Welfare Clause of Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution enumerates a power to “provide for the common defense and general welfare.” A literal interpretation of this clause (“the general welfare interpretation”) would authorize Congress to legislate for any national purpose, and therefore to address all national problems— for example, the COVID-19 pandemic—in ways that would be precluded under the prevailing understanding of limited enumerated powers. But conventional doctrine rejects the general welfare interpretation and construes the General Welfare Clause to confer the so-called “Spending Power,” a power only to spend, but not to regulate, for …
A Century In The Making: The Glorious Revolution, The American Revolution, And The Origins Of The U.S. Constitution’S Eighth Amendment, John D. Bessler
A Century In The Making: The Glorious Revolution, The American Revolution, And The Origins Of The U.S. Constitution’S Eighth Amendment, John D. Bessler
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The sixteen words in the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment have their roots in England’s Glorious Revolution of 1688–89. This Article traces the historical events that initially gave rise to the prohibitions against excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. Those three proscriptions can be found in the English Declaration of Rights and in its statutory counterpart, the English Bill of Rights. In particular, the Article describes the legal cases and draconian punishments during the Stuart dynasty that led English and Scottish parliamentarians to insist on protections against cruelty and excessive governmental actions. In describing the grotesque punishments of …
The First Century Of Magna Carta: The Diffusion Of Texts And Knowledge Of The Charter, Paul Brand
The First Century Of Magna Carta: The Diffusion Of Texts And Knowledge Of The Charter, Paul Brand
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Interpretation And Re-Interpretation Of A Clause: Magna Carta And The Widow’S Quarantine, Janet Loengard
Interpretation And Re-Interpretation Of A Clause: Magna Carta And The Widow’S Quarantine, Janet Loengard
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Great Charter Turned 800: Remembering Its 700th Birthday, Karl Shoemaker
The Great Charter Turned 800: Remembering Its 700th Birthday, Karl Shoemaker
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Forest Law Through The Looking Glass: Distortions Of The Forest Charter In The Outlaw Fiction Of Late Medieval England, Sarah Harlan-Haughey
Forest Law Through The Looking Glass: Distortions Of The Forest Charter In The Outlaw Fiction Of Late Medieval England, Sarah Harlan-Haughey
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Legacy Of Magna Carta: Law And Justice In The Fourteenth Century, Anthony Musson
The Legacy Of Magna Carta: Law And Justice In The Fourteenth Century, Anthony Musson
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Magna Carta In The Late Middle Ages: Over-Mighty Subjects, Under-Mighty Kings, And A Turn Away From Trial By Jury, David J. Seipp
Magna Carta In The Late Middle Ages: Over-Mighty Subjects, Under-Mighty Kings, And A Turn Away From Trial By Jury, David J. Seipp
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Forest Eyre Justices In The Reign Of Henry Iii (1216–1272), Ryan Rowberry
Forest Eyre Justices In The Reign Of Henry Iii (1216–1272), Ryan Rowberry
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Magna Carta In The Fourteenth Century: From Law To Symbol?: Reflections On The “Six Statutes”, Charles Donahue Jr.
Magna Carta In The Fourteenth Century: From Law To Symbol?: Reflections On The “Six Statutes”, Charles Donahue Jr.
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Church And Magna Carta, R. H. Helmholz
The Church And Magna Carta, R. H. Helmholz
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Salvation By Statute: Magna Carta, Legislation, And The King’S Soul, Thomas J. Mcsweeney
Salvation By Statute: Magna Carta, Legislation, And The King’S Soul, Thomas J. Mcsweeney
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And "We The People": Revisions In Need Of Revising, Martin S. Flaherty
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And "We The People": Revisions In Need Of Revising, Martin S. Flaherty
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Power In The Constitutional Theory Of James Madison, Jack N. Rakove
Judicial Power In The Constitutional Theory Of James Madison, Jack N. Rakove
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall: Remarks Of October 6, 2000, William H. Rehnquist
John Marshall: Remarks Of October 6, 2000, William H. Rehnquist
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congress As Culprit: How Lawmakers Spurred On The Court's Anti-Congress Crusade, Neal Devins
Congress As Culprit: How Lawmakers Spurred On The Court's Anti-Congress Crusade, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Notes On A Bicentennial Constitution: Part Ii, Antinomial Choices And The Role Of The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
Notes On A Bicentennial Constitution: Part Ii, Antinomial Choices And The Role Of The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise.