Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (301)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (117)
- West Virginia University (71)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (55)
- American University Washington College of Law (54)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (54)
- William & Mary Law School (50)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (46)
- Brigham Young University Law School (41)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (41)
- University of Richmond (40)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (37)
- Seattle University School of Law (36)
- St. Mary's University (18)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Florida State University College of Law (16)
- University of Washington School of Law (16)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- University of Georgia School of Law (10)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (9)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- The University of Akron (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- University of Michigan Law School (126)
- Law professors (125)
- Biography (73)
- Tribute (64)
- Scholarship (39)
-
- United States Supreme Court (35)
- Marshall-Wythe School of Law (32)
- College of William and Mary (31)
- Memorial (30)
- Law students (29)
- Judges (25)
- Law School Faculty (23)
- Indiana University School of Law (22)
- Supreme Court (21)
- Jr. (20)
- Law school deans (20)
- Lawyers (19)
- History (18)
- Tributes (16)
- Book Review (15)
- In memoriam (14)
- Jackson (John H.) (14)
- Bishop (William W. Jr.) (12)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (12)
- Justice Stevens (12)
- Law schools (12)
- Pickering (John H.) (12)
- Law reform (11)
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- Gabriel Wilner (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (231)
- Indiana Law Journal (117)
- West Virginia Law Review (71)
- Villanova Law Review (54)
- Human Rights Brief (52)
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (52)
- William & Mary Law Review (45)
- Maryland Law Review (43)
- BYU Law Review (40)
- University of Richmond Law Review (40)
- Buffalo Law Review (37)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (36)
- Seattle University Law Review (35)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (23)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (18)
- Touro Law Review (18)
- Florida State University Law Review (16)
- Washington Law Review (15)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (13)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (13)
- Northwestern University Law Review (12)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (11)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (10)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (9)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (5)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 1130
Full-Text Articles in Law
Honoring Lutie A. Lytle And John Mercer Langston With Our Words, Carliss Chatman
Honoring Lutie A. Lytle And John Mercer Langston With Our Words, Carliss Chatman
Washington and Lee Law Review
The recent attacks on critical race theory make one fact very clear: the lack of Black voices in public discourse creates distortion and exploitation. This inaugural Black Scholars Book, the first of its kind published annually, is not about defining or justifying critical race theory—as some scholars in this book would not deem themselves to be critical race theorists. Instead, it is about righting the wrongs that enable the weaponization of scholarship by and about Black people. The goal of the W&L Law Review is to hold space for scholarship of historically marginalized and silenced voices. This inaugural book contains …
Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist Or Hubris-In-Chief?, Eric J. Segall
Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist Or Hubris-In-Chief?, Eric J. Segall
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
The conventional wisdom among Supreme Court scholars and commentators is that Chief Justice John Roberts is an institutionalist who cares deeply about both his personal legacy and the Supreme Court’s prestige over time. This essay challenges that belief. While the Chief certainly cares about how the Court is perceived by the public, as do most of the justices, what most defines Roberts is his hubris—not a concern for the Court’s legitimacy or even his own place in history. Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences. …
Professor Bonita K. Roberts—A Colleague And A “Conscience”, Victoria Mather
Professor Bonita K. Roberts—A Colleague And A “Conscience”, Victoria Mather
St. Mary's Law Journal
A tribute to Bonita K. Roberts, a professor at St. Mary's University School of Law.
Tribute To Professor Bonita K. Roberts, David A. Schlueter
Tribute To Professor Bonita K. Roberts, David A. Schlueter
St. Mary's Law Journal
A tribute to St. Mary's University School of Law Professor Bonita K. Roberts.
In Honor Of Professor Bonita K. Roberts, Linda L. Schlueter, Faye Bracey
In Honor Of Professor Bonita K. Roberts, Linda L. Schlueter, Faye Bracey
St. Mary's Law Journal
A tribute to Professor Bonita K. Roberts of St. Mary's University School of Law.
Foreword: Humanity, Dignity, And Grace, Brant J. Hellwig
Foreword: Humanity, Dignity, And Grace, Brant J. Hellwig
Washington and Lee Law Review
Commentary from Dean Brant Hellwig of the Washington and Lee University School of Law on the 2020-2021 Annual Lara D. Gass Symposium celebrating Hon. Roger L. Gregory, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and this special issue of the Law Review featuring scholarship relating to that event.
The Jurisprudence Of The First Woman Judge, Florence Allen: Challenging The Myth Of Women Judging Differently, Tracy A. Thomas
The Jurisprudence Of The First Woman Judge, Florence Allen: Challenging The Myth Of Women Judging Differently, Tracy A. Thomas
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
This Article delves into the life and work of Judge [Florence] Allen to provide insight to the contributions and jurisprudence of the first woman judge. For history questions what difference putting a woman on the bench might have made. Part I explores Allen’s early influences on her intellectual development grounded in her progressive and politically active family, and her close network of female professional friends. Part II discusses her pivotal work with the women’s suffrage movement, working with the national organizations in New York and leading the legal and political efforts in Ohio. This proactive commitment to gender justice, however, …
Tribute To Professor David Bruck, Cristina Becker, C. Elizabeth Belmont, Johanna Bond, J.D. King, Zoe Bruck, Judy Clarke, Dawn M. Davison, Bernadette M. Donovan, Matthew L. Engle, William S. Geimer, Dan Goldman, Brandon Hasbrouck, Laura G. Hastay, Alexandra L. Klein, Emily Kuchar, Charu Kulkarni, Kristina Leslie, Kamyle Li, Kevin Mcnally, Maisie Osteen, Jonathan Shapiro, Scott E. Sundby
Tribute To Professor David Bruck, Cristina Becker, C. Elizabeth Belmont, Johanna Bond, J.D. King, Zoe Bruck, Judy Clarke, Dawn M. Davison, Bernadette M. Donovan, Matthew L. Engle, William S. Geimer, Dan Goldman, Brandon Hasbrouck, Laura G. Hastay, Alexandra L. Klein, Emily Kuchar, Charu Kulkarni, Kristina Leslie, Kamyle Li, Kevin Mcnally, Maisie Osteen, Jonathan Shapiro, Scott E. Sundby
Washington and Lee Law Review
A tribute to Professor David I. Bruck, who served on the faculty of the Washington and Lee University School of Law from 2004 to 2020. Bruck directed W&L's death penalty defense clinic, the Virginia Capital Case Clearinghouse, also known as "VC3". He became Professor of Law, Emeritus in 2020.
Racial Revisionism, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
Racial Revisionism, Shaun Ossei-Owusu
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Enigma of Clarence Thomas. by Corey Robin.
One Of The Good Guys: The Making Of A Justice–Reflections On My First 94 Years, Jamal Greene
One Of The Good Guys: The Making Of A Justice–Reflections On My First 94 Years, Jamal Greene
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Charles Reich And The Legal History Of Privacy, Sarah A. Seo
Charles Reich And The Legal History Of Privacy, Sarah A. Seo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Closing Remarks, Dontay Proctor-Mills
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Seattle University Law Review
The doctrine of duress is common to other bodies of law, but the application of the duress doctrine is both unclear and highly unstable in immigration law. Outside of immigration law, a person who commits a criminal act out of well-placed fear of terrible consequences is different than a person who willingly commits a crime, but American immigration law does not recognize this difference. The lack of clarity leads to certain absurd results and demands reimagining, redefinition, and an unequivocal statement of the significance of duress in ascertaining culpability. While there are inevitably some difficult lines to be drawn in …
No, The Firing Squad Is Not Better Than Lethal Injection: A Response To Stephanie Moran’S A Modest Proposal, Michael Conklin
No, The Firing Squad Is Not Better Than Lethal Injection: A Response To Stephanie Moran’S A Modest Proposal, Michael Conklin
Seattle University Law Review
In the article A Modest Proposal: The Federal Government Should Use Firing Squads to Execute Federal Death Row Inmates, Stephanie Moran argues that the firing squad is the only execution method that meets the requirements of the Eighth Amendment. In order to make her case, Moran unjustifiably overstates the negative aspects of lethal injection while understating the negative aspects of firing squads. The entire piece is predicated upon assumptions that are not only unsupported by the evidence but often directly refuted by the evidence. This Essay critically analyzes Moran’s claims regarding the alleged advantages of the firing squad over …
The Virginia Company To Chick-Fil-A: Christian Business In America, 1600–2000, Joseph P. Slaughter
The Virginia Company To Chick-Fil-A: Christian Business In America, 1600–2000, Joseph P. Slaughter
Seattle University Law Review
The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is one of its most controversial in recent history. Burwell’s narrow 5–4 ruling states that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 applies to closely held, for-profit corporations seeking religious exemptions to the Affordable Care Act. As a result, the Burwell decision thrust Hobby Lobby, the national craft chain established by the conservative evangelical Green family of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, onto the national stage. Firms like Hobby Lobby and Chick-fil-A, however, reject the conventional wisdom Justice Ginsburg explained in Burwell and instead embrace an approach to business with …
Religious Roots Of Corporate Organization, Amanda Porterfield
Religious Roots Of Corporate Organization, Amanda Porterfield
Seattle University Law Review
Religion and corporate organization have developed side-by-side in Western culture, from antiquity to the present day. This Essay begins with the realignment of religion and secularity in seventeenth-century America, then looks to the religious antecedents of corporate organization in ancient Rome and medieval Europe, and then looks forward to the modern history of corporate organization. This Essay describes the long history behind the entanglement of business and religion in the United States today. It also shows how an understanding of both religion and business can be expanded by looking at the economic aspects of religion and the religious aspects of …
The Spirit Is Willing: A Proposal For American Single Malt Whiskey, Raymond Cleaveland
The Spirit Is Willing: A Proposal For American Single Malt Whiskey, Raymond Cleaveland
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past twenty-five years, small, independent American distilleries have carved out a new niche in the United States liquor market: craft single malt whiskey. Inspired by the success of single malt Scotch and other single malts, American craft distillers are now fighting for their own shelf behind the bar and in the liquor store aisle. In 2018, a cadre of these distillers petitioned the U.S. Treasury Department’s Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau to formally recognize a new category of whiskey in the Code of Federal Regulations: American Single Malt Whiskey. For purposes of consumer protection, the Treasury …
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks.
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
Seattle University Law Review
The Deans' Roundtable.
Marissa Jackson Sow’S “Whiteness As Contract”, Marissa Jackson Sow
Marissa Jackson Sow’S “Whiteness As Contract”, Marissa Jackson Sow
Seattle University Law Review
Marissa Jackson Sow’s “Whiteness as Contract.”
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Tribute To Professor Doug Rendleman, Katy Barnett, Alison Bell, Jeff Berryman, Neil Birkhoff, Daniel Friedmann, Thomas P. Gallanis, Claire Hagan Eller, Brandon Hasbrouck, Corey Hauser, Brant Hellwig, Margaret Howard, Alexandra L. Klein, Douglas Laycock, Benjamin V. Madison, Iii, Judith L. Madison, Kyle Mcnew, Linda Mullenix, Rami Rashmawi, Caprice Roberts, Victoria Shannon Sahani, Joan Shaughnessy, Barry Sullivan, Martha Vazquez, Edilson Vitorelli
Tribute To Professor Doug Rendleman, Katy Barnett, Alison Bell, Jeff Berryman, Neil Birkhoff, Daniel Friedmann, Thomas P. Gallanis, Claire Hagan Eller, Brandon Hasbrouck, Corey Hauser, Brant Hellwig, Margaret Howard, Alexandra L. Klein, Douglas Laycock, Benjamin V. Madison, Iii, Judith L. Madison, Kyle Mcnew, Linda Mullenix, Rami Rashmawi, Caprice Roberts, Victoria Shannon Sahani, Joan Shaughnessy, Barry Sullivan, Martha Vazquez, Edilson Vitorelli
Washington and Lee Law Review
A tribute to Professor Doug Rendleman, who served on the faculty of the Washington and Lee University School of Law from 1988 to 2020. Rendleman became Professor of Law, Emeritus in 2020.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor: The Court’S Premier Defender Of The Fourth Amendment, David L. Hudson Jr.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor: The Court’S Premier Defender Of The Fourth Amendment, David L. Hudson Jr.
Seattle University Law Review
This essay posits that Justice Sotomayor is the Court’s chief defender of the Fourth Amendment and the cherished values it protects. She has consistently defended Fourth Amendment freedoms—in majority, concurring, and especially in dissenting opinions. Part I recounts a few of her majority opinions in Fourth Amendment cases. Part II examines her concurring opinion in United States v. Jones. Part III examines several of her dissenting opinions in Fourth Amendment cases. A review of these opinions demonstrates what should be clear to any observer of the Supreme Court: Justice Sotomayor consistently defends Fourth Amendment principles and values.
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Seattle University Law Review
Ipse Dixit, the podcast on legal scholarship, provides a valuable service to the legal community and particularly to the legal academy. The podcast’s hosts skillfully interview guests about their legal and law-related scholarship, helping those guests communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. In this review essay, I argue that Ipse Dixit has made a major contribution to legal scholarship by demonstrating in its interview episodes that law review articles are neither the only nor the best way of communicating scholarly ideas. This contribution should be considered “scholarship,” because one of the primary goals of scholarship is to communicate new ideas.
Government Tweets, Government Speech: The First Amendment Implications Of Government Trolling, Douglas B. Mckechnie
Government Tweets, Government Speech: The First Amendment Implications Of Government Trolling, Douglas B. Mckechnie
Seattle University Law Review
President Trump has been accused of using @realDonaldTrump to troll his critics. While the President’s tweets are often attributed to his personal views, they raise important Constitutional questions. This article posits that @realDonaldTrump tweets are government speech and, where they troll government critics, they violate the Free Speech Clause. I begin the article with an exploration of President Trump’s use of @realDonaldTrump from his time as a private citizen to President. The article then chronicles the development of the government speech doctrine and the Supreme Court’s factors that differentiate private speech from government speech. I argue that, based on the …
Court-Packing In 2021: Pathways To Democratic Legitimacy, Richard Mailey
Court-Packing In 2021: Pathways To Democratic Legitimacy, Richard Mailey
Seattle University Law Review
This Article asks whether the openness to court-packing expressed by a number of Democratic presidential candidates (e.g., Pete Buttigieg) is democratically defensible. More specifically, it asks whether it is possible to break the apparent link between demagogic populism and court-packing, and it examines three possible ways of doing this via Bruce Ackerman’s dualist theory of constitutional moments—a theory which offers the possibility of legitimating problematic pathways to constitutional change on democratic but non-populist grounds. In the end, the Article suggests that an Ackermanian perspective offers just one, extremely limited pathway to democratically legitimate court-packing in 2021: namely, where a Democratic …
Tribute To Professor Samuel W. Calhoun, Doug Ammar, David Carson, Kelly Faglioni, John Fishwick, Mark Grunewald, Stephen Halpin, Brandon Hasbrouck, Brant Hellwig, Lyman Johnson, Bill Johnston, Rick Kirgis, Brian Murchison, Joan Shaughnessy, Howard Wall
Tribute To Professor Samuel W. Calhoun, Doug Ammar, David Carson, Kelly Faglioni, John Fishwick, Mark Grunewald, Stephen Halpin, Brandon Hasbrouck, Brant Hellwig, Lyman Johnson, Bill Johnston, Rick Kirgis, Brian Murchison, Joan Shaughnessy, Howard Wall
Washington and Lee Law Review
A tribute to Professor Samuel W. Calhoun, who served on the faculty of the Washington and Lee University School of Law from 1978 to 2020. Calhoun became Professor of Law, Emeritus in 2020.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents