Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Biography (4)
- Memorial (4)
- Obituary (4)
- Thomas L. Shaffer (4)
- Thomas Shaffer (4)
-
- Tom Shaffer (4)
- Tribute (4)
- Chandler (1)
- Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit (1)
- Discipline (1)
- Discipline of judge (1)
- District court judge (1)
- Ethics reform (1)
- Federal judges (1)
- Fitness of judge (1)
- Hugo Black (1)
- Judge Chandler (1)
- Judge impeachment (1)
- Judicial ethics (1)
- Judicial impeachment (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Removal judge (1)
- Removal judicial duties (1)
- Remove judicial duties (1)
- Tenth Circuit (1)
- William Douglas (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Thomas L. Shaffer, Legal Ethics, And St. Mary’S University, Vincent R. Johnson
Thomas L. Shaffer, Legal Ethics, And St. Mary’S University, Vincent R. Johnson
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Tribute to Thomas L. Shaffer
Thomas L. Shaffer: A Remembrance, Noel Augustyn
Thomas L. Shaffer: A Remembrance, Noel Augustyn
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Tribute to Thomas L. Shaffer
Lawyers, Religious Faith, And Virtues: Reflections On Tom And Nancy Shaffer, Robert F. Cochran Jr.
Lawyers, Religious Faith, And Virtues: Reflections On Tom And Nancy Shaffer, Robert F. Cochran Jr.
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Tribute to Tom and Nancy Shaffer
A Jewish Perspective On Tom Shaffer: Zecher Tzadik Livracha (May The Memory Of The Righteous Be A Blessing), Russell G. Pearce
A Jewish Perspective On Tom Shaffer: Zecher Tzadik Livracha (May The Memory Of The Righteous Be A Blessing), Russell G. Pearce
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Tribute to Thomas L. Shaffer
The Right To An Independent Judiciary And The Avoidance Of Constitutional Conflict: The Burger Court’S Flawed Reasoning In Chandler V. Judicial Council Of The Tenth Circuit And Its Unfortunate Legacy, Joshua E. Kastenberg
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
In 1970, the United States Supreme Court issued Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit in which five Justices determined that the federal courts of appeals possessed an administrative authority to manage the district court judges within an appellate court’s respective circuit. The decision enabled the Tenth Circuit to decide the fitness of a judge to preside over cases without a formal motion from a litigant. Although Congress had enabled the courts of appeals to oversee basic judicial functions (such as temporarily assigning district court judges to overworked districts), Congress did not intend to grant the power to remove …