Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Hate Crime (5)
- Abortion (1)
- Activism (1)
- Affordable housing (1)
- Animus (1)
-
- Bitcoin (1)
- Chicago (1)
- Chicago Freedom Movement (1)
- Cryptocurrency (1)
- Delayed synergy (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Disgust (1)
- Gautreaux (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Montgomery Bus Boycott (1)
- NFT (1)
- Property (1)
- Public enforcement (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Social change litigation (1)
- State law (1)
- Strategy (1)
- United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Moral Nuisance Abatement Statutes, Scott W. Stern
Moral Nuisance Abatement Statutes, Scott W. Stern
Northwestern University Law Review
On May 19, 2021, Texas enacted S.B. 8—also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act—which prohibits almost any abortion of a fetus once a heartbeat can be detected, effectively banning abortions after only six weeks of pregnancy. Just as controversially, S.B. 8 also specifies that it is enforceable exclusively through private civil actions, and it allows any private person to sue anyone who “performs,” “induces,” or “knowingly . . . aids or abets the performance or inducement of an abortion,” seeking injunctive relief and statutory damages of $10,000 per violation. The passage of S.B. 8 immediately led to calls for, and …
Delayed Synergy: Challenging Housing Discrimination In Chicago In The Streets And In The Courts, Leonard S. Rubinowitz, Michelle Shaw
Delayed Synergy: Challenging Housing Discrimination In Chicago In The Streets And In The Courts, Leonard S. Rubinowitz, Michelle Shaw
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
During the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Montgomery Improvement Association combined a boycott with a successful constitutional challenge to bus segregation laws, producing more progress to desegregate the buses than either strategy could have brought about on its own. The Montgomery Improvement Association’s approach was a paradigm of the synergy between a social movement and social change litigation.
This Article argues for opportunities for synergy between social movements and social change litigation in three ways: 1) extending the time frame; 2) joining the forces of two separate organizations to produce change, unlike the single organization in Montgomery; and 3) creating an …
Disgust And Guns: Conduct, Identity, And Second Amendment Animus, William D. Araiza
Disgust And Guns: Conduct, Identity, And Second Amendment Animus, William D. Araiza
Northwestern University Law Review
In Second Amendment Animus, Professor Jacob Charles examines whether the burgeoning doctrine of unconstitutional animus should play any role in adjudicating Second Amendment claims. This Essay responds to Professor Charles’s important work. While it concludes that he is likely correct to reject animus as a grounding for Second Amendment claims, it points out areas where the analysis is more nuanced than he suggests. After considering Professor Charles’s analysis, the Essay examines the Second Amendment animus issue through the theoretical lens provided by Professor Martha Nussbaum’s work on disgust as a motivating factor for the types of exclusionary and subordinating …
Possessing Intangibles, João Marinotti
Possessing Intangibles, João Marinotti
Northwestern University Law Review
The concept of possession is currently considered inapplicable to intangible assets, whether data, cryptocurrency, or NFTs. Under this view, intangible assets categorically fall outside the purview of property law’s foundational doctrines. Such sweeping conclusions stem from a misunderstanding of the role of possession in property law. This Article refutes the idea that possession constitutes—or even requires—physical control by distinguishing possession from another foundational concept, that of thinghood. It highlights possession’s unique purpose within the property process: conveying the status of in rem claims. In property law, the concept of possession conveys to third parties the allocation of property rights and …
A Trauma-Centered Approach To Addressing Hate Crimes, Avlana Eisenberg
A Trauma-Centered Approach To Addressing Hate Crimes, Avlana Eisenberg
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
A dominant justification for hate crime laws is that they serve a crucial expressive function—sending messages of valuation to victims, and of denunciation to defendants. Yet, as this Essay will demonstrate, the focus on criminalizing hate—through the enactment of either sentencing enhancements or stand-alone hate crime statutes—has resulted in a thin conception of messaging that fails to recognize the limitations of the criminal law in addressing psychic harm.
This Essay argues that a more robust approach to addressing hate crimes must consider alternatives—beyond incarceration—that would center the trauma associated with hate crimes. This includes restorative justice models that might benefit …
Pick The Lowest Hanging Fruit: Hate Crime Law And The Acknowledgment Of Racial Violence, Jeannine Bell
Pick The Lowest Hanging Fruit: Hate Crime Law And The Acknowledgment Of Racial Violence, Jeannine Bell
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The U.S. has had remedies aimed at racial violence since the Ku Klux Klan Act was passed in the 1870s. Hate crime law, which is more than thirty years old, is the most recent incarnation. The passage of hate crime law, first at the federal level and later by the states, has done very little to slow the rising tide of bigotry. After a brief discussion of state and federal hate crime law, this Article will critically examine the country’s approach to hate crime. The article will then discuss one of the most prevalent forms of hate crime—bias-motivated violence that …
The Conundrums Of Hate Crime Prevention, Shirin Sinnar
The Conundrums Of Hate Crime Prevention, Shirin Sinnar
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The recent surge in hate crimes alongside persistent concerns over policing and prisons has catalyzed new interest in hate crime prevention outside the criminal legal system. While policymakers, civil rights groups, and people in targeted communities internally disagree on the value of hate crime laws and law enforcement responses to hate crimes, they often converge in advocating measures that could prevent hate crimes from occurring in the first place. Those measures potentially include educational initiatives, conflict resolution programs, political reforms, social services, or other proactive efforts aimed at the root causes of hate crimes.
Focusing on the public conversation around …
U.S. Hate Crime Trends: What Disaggregation Of Three Decades Of Data Reveals About A Changing Threat And An Invisible Record, Brian Levin, James Nolan, Kiana Perst
U.S. Hate Crime Trends: What Disaggregation Of Three Decades Of Data Reveals About A Changing Threat And An Invisible Record, Brian Levin, James Nolan, Kiana Perst
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
When prejudice-related data are combined and analyzed over time, critical information is uncovered about overall trends, related intermittent spikes, and less common sharp inflectional shifts in aggression. These shifts impact social cohesion and grievously harm specific sub-groups when aggression escalates and is redirected or mainstreamed. These data, so critical to public policy formation, show that we are in such a historic inflection period now. Moreover, analysis of the latest, though partial Federal Bureau of Investigation hate crime data release, when overlaid with available data from excluded large jurisdictions, reveals hate crimes hit a record high in 2021 in the United …
Reframing Hate, Lu-In Wang
Reframing Hate, Lu-In Wang
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The concept and naming of “hate crime,” and the adoption of special laws to address it, provoked controversy and raised fundamental questions when they were introduced in the 1980s. In the decades since, neither hate crime itself nor those hotly debated questions have abated. To the contrary, hate crime has increased in recent years—although the prominent target groups have shifted over time—and the debate over hate crime laws has reignited as well. The still-open questions range from the philosophical to the doctrinal to the pragmatic: What justifies the enhanced punishment that hate crime laws impose based on the perpetrator’s motivation? …