Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Legal history (4)
- Antitrust (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Empirical legal studies (3)
-
- Intellectual property (3)
- Law & economics (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Discrimination (2)
- Eligibility (2)
- Enforcement (2)
- Human rights (2)
- Patents (2)
- Police (2)
- Politics (2)
- Women’s rights (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Advisors (1)
- Agent (1)
- Agglomeration (1)
- Alienability (1)
- And Economic Stability Act (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Assisted reproductive technology law & policy (1)
- Benefit/cost analysis (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Black Lives Matter movement (1)
- CEDAW (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 45
Full-Text Articles in Law
Preserving Life By Ranking Rights, John William Draper
Preserving Life By Ranking Rights, John William Draper
Librarian Scholarship at Penn Law
Border walls, abortion, and the death penalty are the current battlegrounds of the right to life. We will visit each topic and more in this paper, as we consider ranking groups of constitutional rights.
The enumerated rights of the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments—life, liberty, and property—merit special treatment. They have a deeper and richer history that involves ranking. Ranking life in lexical priority over liberty and property rights protects life first and maximizes safe liberty and property rights in the absence of a significant risk to life. This is not new law; aspects of it …
Debating Immigration Restriction: The Case For Low And Slow, Amy L. Wax
Debating Immigration Restriction: The Case For Low And Slow, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
This article critiques our current politics of immigration, which is dominated by moralized and sentimental rhetoric. It argues for a more honest and balanced discussion of the merits of the status quo. A more mature debate would take into account many factors that now receive insufficient attention from politicians, academics, and the mainstream media, including the interests of voters and citizens as well as newcomers, legitimate nationalistic concerns both economic and cultural, the need for unity, stability, and cohesion through assimilation to a common culture, the primacy of American sovereignty through the maintenance of secure borders, and the integrity of …
Falling Between The Cracks: Understanding Why States Fail In Protecting Our Children From Crime, Michal Gilad
Falling Between The Cracks: Understanding Why States Fail In Protecting Our Children From Crime, Michal Gilad
All Faculty Scholarship
The article is the first to take an inclusive look at the monumental problem of crime exposure during childhood, which is estimated to be one of the most damaging and costly public health and public safety problem in our society today. It takes-on the challenging task of ‘naming’ the problem by coining the term Comprehensive Childhood Crime Impact or in short the Triple-C Impact. Informed by scientific findings, the term embodies the full effect of direct and indirect crime exposure on children due to their unique developmental characteristics, and the spillover effect the problem has on our society as …
A General Mitigation For Disturbance-Driven Crimes?: Psychic State, Personal Choice, And Normative Inquiries, Paul H. Robinson
A General Mitigation For Disturbance-Driven Crimes?: Psychic State, Personal Choice, And Normative Inquiries, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
It is argued here that the narrow provoked “heat of passion” mitigation available under current law ought to be significantly expanded to include not just murder but all felonies and not just “heat of passion” but potentially all mental or emotional disturbances, whenever the offender’s situation and capacities meaningfully reduce the offender’s blameworthiness for the violation. In determining eligibility for mitigation, the jury should take into account (a) the extent to which the offender was acting under the influence of mental or emotional disturbance (the psychic state inquiry), (b) given the offender’s situation and capacities, the extent to which one …
The Securities Law Implications Of Financial Illiteracy, Lisa Fairfax
The Securities Law Implications Of Financial Illiteracy, Lisa Fairfax
All Faculty Scholarship
Every financial literacy study conducted over the last few decades concurs: Americans, including American investors, are financially illiterate. This Article argues that America’s financial illiteracy poses a significant, widespread, and long-term challenge for our federal securities regime because that regime is premised almost entirely on disclosure as the best form of investor protection and, by extension, on investors’ ability to understand disclosure. By advancing a typology of investors and their disclosure needs, this Article further argues that we may have significantly underestimated the extent of the financial illiteracy problem based on at least two flawed assumptions. First, we have presumed …
The Salience Theory Of Consumer Financial Regulation, Natasha Sarin
The Salience Theory Of Consumer Financial Regulation, Natasha Sarin
All Faculty Scholarship
Prior to the financial crisis, banks’ fee income was their fastest-growing source of revenue. This revenue was often generated through nefarious bank practices (e.g., ordering overdraft transactions for maximal fees). The crisis focused popular attention on the extent to which current regulatory tools failed consumers in these markets, and policymakers responded: A new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was tasked with monitoring consumer finance products, and some of the earliest post-crisis financial reforms sought to lower consumer costs. This Article is the first to empirically evaluate the success of the consumer finance reform agenda by considering three recent price regulations: a …
Marginal Rates Under The Tcja, Reed Shuldiner
Marginal Rates Under The Tcja, Reed Shuldiner
All Faculty Scholarship
In this report, Shuldiner argues that although the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act appears to offer an across-the board reduction in individual marginal tax rates augmented by an additional 20 percent reduction in rates on unincorporated business income, the situation is significantly more complex.
Reflections On Two Years Of P.R.O.M.E.S.A., David A. Skeel Jr.
Reflections On Two Years Of P.R.O.M.E.S.A., David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
This Essay draws both on my scholarly and on my personal experience as a member of Puerto Rico’s oversight board to assess the first two years of the Board’s existence. I begin in a scholarly mode, by exploring the question of where P.R.O.M.E.S.A., the legislation that created the Board, came from. P.R.O.M.E.S.A.’s core provisions are, I will argue, the product of two historical patterns that have emerged in responses to the financial distress of public entities in the United States. The first dates back to the 1970s crisis in New York City, while the second is much more recent. If …
Informed Consent And The Role Of The Treating Physician, Eric Feldman, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Steven Joffe
Informed Consent And The Role Of The Treating Physician, Eric Feldman, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Steven Joffe
All Faculty Scholarship
In the century since Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo famously declared that “[e]very human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body,” informed consent has become a central feature of American medical practice. In an increasingly team-based and technology-driven system, however, who is — or ought to be — responsible for obtaining a patient’s consent? Must the treating physician personally provide all the necessary disclosures, or can the consent process, like other aspects of modern medicine, take advantage of specialization and division of labor? Analysis of Shinal v. Toms, …
The Ethics Of Medicaid’S Work Requirements And Other Personal Responsibility Policies, Harald Schmidt, Allison K. Hoffman
The Ethics Of Medicaid’S Work Requirements And Other Personal Responsibility Policies, Harald Schmidt, Allison K. Hoffman
All Faculty Scholarship
Breaking controversial new ground, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently invited states to consider establishing work requirements as a condition of receiving Medicaid benefits. Noncompliant beneficiaries may lose some or all benefits, and if they do, will incur higher spending if they have to pay for medical care out of pocket. Current evidence suggests work requirements and related policies, which proponents claim promote personal responsibility, can create considerable risks of health and financial harm in vulnerable populations. Concerns about implementing these policies in Medicaid have been widely expressed, including by major physician organizations, and others have examined …
Hipster Antitrust: New Bottles, Same Old W(H)Ine?, Christopher S. Yoo
Hipster Antitrust: New Bottles, Same Old W(H)Ine?, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Although the debate over hipster antitrust is often portrayed as something new, experienced observers recognize it as a replay of an old argument that was resolved by the global consensus that antitrust should focus on consumer welfare rather than on the size of firms, the levels of industry concentration, and other considerations. Moreover, the history of the Federal Trade Commission’s Section 5 authority to prevent unfair methods of competition stands as a reminder of the dangers of allowing enforcement policy to be guided by vague and uncertain standards.
The Dynamic Impact Of Periodic Review On Women’S Rights, Cosette D. Creamer, Beth A. Simmons
The Dynamic Impact Of Periodic Review On Women’S Rights, Cosette D. Creamer, Beth A. Simmons
All Faculty Scholarship
Human rights treaty bodies have been frequently criticized as useless and the regime’s self-reporting procedure widely viewed as a whitewash. Yet very little research explores what, if any, influence this periodic review process has on governments’ implementation of and compliance with treaty obligations. We argue oversight committees may play an important role in improving rights on the ground by providing information for international and primarily domestic audiences. This paper examines the cumulative effects on women’s rights of self-reporting and oversight review, using original data on the history of state reporting to and review by the Committee on the Elimination of …
Why International Law Should Matter To Black Lives Matter: A Draft Petition To The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights On Behalf Of The Family Of Eric Garner, Laura Goolsby
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
What About Uncle Sam? Carving A Place For The Public Trust Doctrine In Federal Climate Litigation, Zachary L. Berliner
What About Uncle Sam? Carving A Place For The Public Trust Doctrine In Federal Climate Litigation, Zachary L. Berliner
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Positive Disruption: Addressing Race In A Time Of Social Change Through A Team-Taught, Reflection-Based, Ouward-Looking Law School Seminar, Alexi Nunn Freeman, Lindsey Webb
Positive Disruption: Addressing Race In A Time Of Social Change Through A Team-Taught, Reflection-Based, Ouward-Looking Law School Seminar, Alexi Nunn Freeman, Lindsey Webb
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Exclusionary Megacities, Wendell Pritchett, Shitong Qiao
Exclusionary Megacities, Wendell Pritchett, Shitong Qiao
All Faculty Scholarship
Human beings should live in places where they are most productive, and megacities, where information, innovation and opportunities congregate, would be the optimal choice. Yet megacities in both China and the U.S. are excluding people by limiting housing supply. Why, despite their many differences, is the same type of exclusion happening in both Chinese and U.S. megacities? Urban law and policy scholars argue that Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) homeowners are taking over megacities in the U.S. and hindering housing development therein. They pin their hopes on an efficient growth machine that makes sure “above all, nothing gets in the way of building.” …
Not Your Mouthpiece: Abortion, Ideology, And Compelled Speech In Physician-Patient Relationships, Sarah Kramer
Not Your Mouthpiece: Abortion, Ideology, And Compelled Speech In Physician-Patient Relationships, Sarah Kramer
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
A Dose Of Color, A Dose Of Reality: Contextualizing Intentional Tort Actions With Black Documentaries, Regina Austin
A Dose Of Color, A Dose Of Reality: Contextualizing Intentional Tort Actions With Black Documentaries, Regina Austin
All Faculty Scholarship
This article describes the way documentary films can provide important cultural context in the assessment of tort claims. This kind of contextual analysis exposes the social conditions that drive legal disputes. For example, in the case of Klayman v. Obama, Larry Klayman claimed that Black Lives Matter, among other defendants, was liable for various intentional torts (including intentional infliction of emotional distress) by fomenting hostility toward the police in black communities. The court dismissed the case but declined to hold Klayman liable for sanctions. One documentary film, I Am Not Your Negro, locates Klayman’s claims in a historical …
Masthead
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Stay Put And The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: A Proposal For Clarity And Change, Blakely Evanthia Simoneau
Stay Put And The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: A Proposal For Clarity And Change, Blakely Evanthia Simoneau
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
The "Holy Trinity" Of The United Nations Universal Periodic Review: How To Make An Effective Recommendation Regarding Women's Rights, Sarah Tufano
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Crafting Complaints And Settlements In Child Welfare Litigation, Zach Strassburger
Crafting Complaints And Settlements In Child Welfare Litigation, Zach Strassburger
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Neighborhood Upzoning And Racial Displacement: A Potential Target For Disparate Impact Litigation?, Bradley Pough
Neighborhood Upzoning And Racial Displacement: A Potential Target For Disparate Impact Litigation?, Bradley Pough
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
Deconstructing Re-Entry: Idenitfying Issues, Best Practices, And Solutions, Jamil A. Favors
Deconstructing Re-Entry: Idenitfying Issues, Best Practices, And Solutions, Jamil A. Favors
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
The Right To Die In The United States, Canada, And China: Legal Fictions And Their Utility In A Comparative Perspective, Konstantin Tretyakov
The Right To Die In The United States, Canada, And China: Legal Fictions And Their Utility In A Comparative Perspective, Konstantin Tretyakov
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
A Way Out Of The "Rotten Social Background" Stalemate: "Scarcity" And Stephen Morse's Proposed Generic Partial Excuse, Elisabeth Winston Lambert
A Way Out Of The "Rotten Social Background" Stalemate: "Scarcity" And Stephen Morse's Proposed Generic Partial Excuse, Elisabeth Winston Lambert
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change
No abstract provided.
The Ecology Of Transparency Reloaded, Seth F. Kreimer
The Ecology Of Transparency Reloaded, Seth F. Kreimer
All Faculty Scholarship
As Justice Stewart famously observed, "[t]he Constitution itself is neither a Freedom of Information Act nor an Official Secrets Act." What the Constitution's text omits, the last two generations have embedded in "small c" constitutional law and practice in the form of the Freedom of Information Act and a series of overlapping governance reforms including Inspectors General, disclosure of political contributions, the State Department’s “Dissent Channel,” the National Archives Information Security Oversight Office, and the publication rights guaranteed by New York Times v. United States. These institutions constitute an ecology of transparency.
The late Justice Scalia argued that the …
Reasonable Patent Exhaustion, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Reasonable Patent Exhaustion, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
A lengthy tug of war between the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals may have ended when the Supreme Court held that the sale of a patented article exhausts the patentee seller’s rights to enforce restrictions on that article through patent infringement suits. Further, reversing the Federal Circuit, the parties cannot bargain around this rule through the seller’s specification of conditions stated at the time of sale, no matter how clear. No inquiry need be made into the patentee’s market power, anticompetitive effects, or other types of harms, whether enforcement of the condition is socially costly or …
The Right Of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined For New York?, Jennifer E. Rothman
The Right Of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined For New York?, Jennifer E. Rothman
All Faculty Scholarship
This essay is based on a featured lecture that I gave as part of the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal’s 2 symposium on a proposed right of publicity law in New York. The essay draws from my recent book, The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public World, published by Harvard University Press. Insights from the book suggest that New York should not upend more than one hundred years of established privacy law in the state, nor jeopardize its citizens’ ownership over their own names, likenesses, and voices by replacing these privacy laws with a new and independent …
Terry Stops And Frisks: The Troubling Use Of Common Sense In A World Of Empirical Data, David Rudovsky, David A. Harris
Terry Stops And Frisks: The Troubling Use Of Common Sense In A World Of Empirical Data, David Rudovsky, David A. Harris
All Faculty Scholarship
The investigative detention doctrine first announced in Terry v. Ohio and amplified over the past fifty years has been much analyzed, praised, and criticized from a number of perspectives. Significantly, however, over this time period commentators have only occasionally questioned the Supreme Court’s “common sense” judgments regarding the factors sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for stops and frisks. For years, the Court has provided no empirical basis for its judgments, due in large part to the lack of reliable data. Now, with the emergence of comprehensive data on these police practices, much can be learned about the predictive power of …