Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights; police misconduct; police tort liability; intellectual history of public and private law; public law; private law; intentional infliction of emotional distress; IIED; police accountability law; Section 1983; constitutional tort; tort law; tort liability; middle spaces; racialized policing; (1)
- Immigration; culture; asylum; refugees; race; gender; social justice; persuasive storytelling; human rights; international; essentialism; Board of Immigration Appeals; BIA; Single Story; stereotyping; particular social group; PSG; (1)
- Judicial deference; landmark; historic district; preservation; Landmarks Preservation Commission; LPC; New York City; Grand Central Terminal; New York Landmarks Law; Penn Central Transportation Company v. The City of New York; Real Estate Board of New York; REBNY; historic preservation; zoning; Article 78; hard look approach; arbitrary and capricious standard; certificate of appropriateness; gentrification; housing shortage; housing crisis; regulatory capture; urban development; landmark demolition (1)
- Puerto Rico; US Territory; commonwealth; colonization; voting rights; suffrage; naturalization; citizenship; Foraker Act; Jones Act; Insular Cases; incorporated territory; unincorporated territory; statehood; taxation without representation; First Amendment; Free Speech; Association; Strict Scrutiny; Government Interests; Compelling Interest; Narrow Tailoring; Proportionality; (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
Brooklyn Law Review
American law and American life are asymmetrical. Law divides neatly in two: public and private. But life is lived in three distinct spaces: pure public, pure private, and hybrid middle spaces that are neither state nor home. Which body of law governs the shops, gyms, and workplaces that are formally accessible to all, but functionally hostile to Black, female, poor, and other marginalized Americans? From the liberal midcentury onward, social justice advocates have treated these spaces as fundamentally public and fully remediable via public law equity commands. This article takes a broader view. It urges a tort law revival in …
Essentializing Cultures In Us Asylum Law, Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer, Estelle Mckee
Essentializing Cultures In Us Asylum Law, Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer, Estelle Mckee
Brooklyn Law Review
Asylum applicants must tell a story about their home country that reduces and problematizes its culture. The requirements of asylum law demand that an applicant show why they will suffer persecution in their home country and that their government will not protect them from it. This legal framework prompts applicants to present a narrative in which their home culture plays the role of the ultimate antagonist, the force that propels the applicant’s persecutors to single them out for harm and renders their government passive—or even complicit—in the face of it. Such a narrative necessarily reduces the applicant’s culture to its …
Puerto Rican Presidential Voting Rights: Why Precedent Should Be Overturned, And Other Options For Suffrage, Sigrid Vendrell-Polanco
Puerto Rican Presidential Voting Rights: Why Precedent Should Be Overturned, And Other Options For Suffrage, Sigrid Vendrell-Polanco
Brooklyn Law Review
The United States has continued to hold Puerto Rico as a colony, much like the British empire did the US colonies, and has given it no clear path to incorporation, statehood, or independent sovereignty. It has also denied its citizens the right to vote for their president and have voting representation in Congress. Current case law regarding Puerto Rican presidential voting rights and voting representation in Congress rests on precedent that dates almost as far back as its acquisition—the infamous Insular Cases. This case law is inconsistent with prior precedent, constitutional principles, and does not account for Puerto Rico’s contributions …
Balancing Preservation With Growth: How Less Judicial Deference To Decisions Made By The Landmarks Preservation Commission Can Save New York City, Amy Cushman
Brooklyn Law Review
The New York City Landmarks Law of 1965, envisioning the preservation of historical treasures, empowered the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) with the authority to designate and regulate landmarks and historic districts. Originally established in response to public outcry over the loss of iconic architectural structures, the LPC aimed to safeguard the city's cultural, social, and architectural legacy. However, this note contends that recent LPC decisions, particularly the issuance of Certificates of Appropriateness for luxury residential construction involving partial demolition of landmarks, betray the original preservation goals. Delving into the legal recourse available under the New York Civil …