Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Anglo culture (1)
- Constitutional Convention (1)
- Cross-cultural damages (1)
- Economical hierarchies (1)
- Enlightenment thinkers (1)
-
- Federal Tort Claims Act (1)
- Federal constitution (1)
- Founding Fathers (1)
- Great Law of Peace (1)
- Iroquois Confederacy (1)
- Iroquois culture (1)
- Judicial bias (1)
- Legal archaeology (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Male dominance (1)
- Matriarchal aspects (1)
- Natural law (1)
- Navajo (1)
- Nineteenth amendment (1)
- Participatory democracies (1)
- Patriarchal American model (1)
- Private property (1)
- Race and power (1)
- Racial conflict (1)
- Racial hierarchies (1)
- Rights of women (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Taylor Grazing Act (1)
- Tenth Circuit (1)
- United States v. Hatahley (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States V. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study In Law And Racial Conflict, Debora L. Threedy
United States V. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study In Law And Racial Conflict, Debora L. Threedy
American Indian Law Review
This article is a case study of United States v. Hatahley using the methodology of "legal archaeology" to reconstruct the historical, social, and economic context of the litigation. In 1953, a group of individual Navajos brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act for the destruction of over one hundred horses and burros. The first section of the article presents two contrasting narratives for the case. The first relates what we know about the case from the reported opinions, while the second locates the litigated case within the larger social context by examining the parties, the history of incidents culminating …
The Iroquois Great Law Of Peace And The United States Constitution: How The Founding Fathers Ignored The Clan Mothers, Renée Jacobs
The Iroquois Great Law Of Peace And The United States Constitution: How The Founding Fathers Ignored The Clan Mothers, Renée Jacobs
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.