Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Psychology (4)
- 1901-1981 (3)
- Crack cocaine (2)
- Criminalization (2)
- Heroin (2)
-
- Income effect (2)
- Jacques Lacan (2)
- Substitution (2)
- 1856-1939 (1)
- Adaptive preference (1)
- Client (1)
- Colorblindness (1)
- Credentials-functional approach (1)
- Criminal liability (1)
- Critical legal studies (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Doctor patient confidentiality (1)
- Domestic abuse (1)
- Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Expanding the definition of psychotherapist (1)
- Expert evidence (1)
- Free will & determinism (1)
- Giffen good (1)
- Influence (1)
- Jacque Lacan (1)
- Jaffee case (1)
- Jaffee v. Redmond (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Kaytal (Neal) (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mental Health Experts On Trial: Free Will And Determinism In The Courtroom, Ronald J. Rychlak, Joseph F. Rychlak
Mental Health Experts On Trial: Free Will And Determinism In The Courtroom, Ronald J. Rychlak, Joseph F. Rychlak
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response: Between Economics And Sociology: The New Path Of Deterrence, Dan M. Kahan
Response: Between Economics And Sociology: The New Path Of Deterrence, Dan M. Kahan
Michigan Law Review
The explosive collision of economics and sociology has long illuminated the landscape of deterrence theory. It is a debate as hopeless as it is spectacular. Economics is practical but thin. Starting from the simple premise that individuals rationally maximize their utility, economics generates a robust schedule of prescriptions - from the appropriate size of criminal penalties,1 to the optimal form of criminal punishments, to the most efficient mix of private and public investments in deterrence. Yet it is the very economy of economics that ultimately subverts it: its account of human motivations is too simplistic to be believable, and it …
Deterrence's Difficulty, Neal Kumar Katyal
Deterrence's Difficulty, Neal Kumar Katyal
Michigan Law Review
We all crave simple elegance. Physicists since Einstein have been searching for a grand unified theory that will tie everything together in a simple model. Law professors have their own grand theories - law and economics's Coase Theorem and constitutional law's Originalism immediately spring to mind. Criminal law is no different, for the analogue is our faith in deterrence - the belief that increasing the penalty on an activity will mean that fewer people will perform it. This theory has much to commend it. After all, economists and shoppers have known for ages that a price increase in a good …
Identifying Law's Unconscious: Disciplinary And Rhetorical Contexts, David S. Caudill
Identifying Law's Unconscious: Disciplinary And Rhetorical Contexts, David S. Caudill
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maladies Of The Legal Soul: Psychoanalysis And Interpretation In Law, Peter Goodrich
Maladies Of The Legal Soul: Psychoanalysis And Interpretation In Law, Peter Goodrich
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lacan And The Subject Of Law: Sexuation And Discourse In The Mapping Of Subject Positions That Give The Ur-Form Of Law, Ellie Ragland
Lacan And The Subject Of Law: Sexuation And Discourse In The Mapping Of Subject Positions That Give The Ur-Form Of Law, Ellie Ragland
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does Law Need An Analyst? Prospects For Lacanian Psychoanalysis In Law, Richard E. Redding
Does Law Need An Analyst? Prospects For Lacanian Psychoanalysis In Law, Richard E. Redding
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Narratives, Theraputic Narratives: The Invisibility And Omnipresence Of Race And Gender, Leslie G. Espinoza
Legal Narratives, Theraputic Narratives: The Invisibility And Omnipresence Of Race And Gender, Leslie G. Espinoza
Michigan Law Review
My first introduction to Denise Gray was through a form. The intake sheet was dated October 17, 1994. The legal problem was straightforward. My introduction to Denise Gray would come much later. I am a clinical law professor. The clinic, Boston College Legal Assistance Bureau, is known as "LAB." I teach students law by supervising them as they represent, usually for the first time, a real person with real problems.
The Liability Of Psychotherapists For Breach Of Confidentiality, Ellen W. Grabois
The Liability Of Psychotherapists For Breach Of Confidentiality, Ellen W. Grabois
Journal of Law and Health
This paper will try to reconstruct the legal and ethical underpinnings of the confidential relationship of psychotherapist and patient, and will also touch upon the psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege and its exceptions. It will then describe the liability of psychotherapists for breach of confidentiality based on contract and tort. It will conclude with some evaluation of this type of cause of action, and its future usefulness in the law..
The Strict Application Of The Restatement, Ohio Law And The Rules Of Civil Procedure: Estates Of Morgan V. Fairfield Family Counseling Center, Geoffrey M. Wardle, Jeffrey L. Mallon
The Strict Application Of The Restatement, Ohio Law And The Rules Of Civil Procedure: Estates Of Morgan V. Fairfield Family Counseling Center, Geoffrey M. Wardle, Jeffrey L. Mallon
Cleveland State Law Review
Considered by some in the mental health profession as the imposition of an onerous duty, the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center represents an extension of the recognized legal duty imposed upon mental health practitioners who treat inpatients to those who treat outpatients. This created a uniform standard. The article begins in Part II by describing the story of a psychiatric patient, Matt Morgan. Part III then discusses the duty to control in the outpatient setting by going through traditional tort analysis, stare decisis, strict statutory application, and civil procedure. Part IV concludes …
The Sixth Amendment: Protecting Defendants' Rights At The Expense Of Child Victims, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (1997), Julie A. Anderson
The Sixth Amendment: Protecting Defendants' Rights At The Expense Of Child Victims, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (1997), Julie A. Anderson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege: A Rational Approach To Defining Psychotherapist, The 1997 John M. Manos Writing Competition On Evidence, Kathleen M. Maynard
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege: A Rational Approach To Defining Psychotherapist, The 1997 John M. Manos Writing Competition On Evidence, Kathleen M. Maynard
Cleveland State Law Review
In the recently decided case of Jaffee v. Redmond, the United States Supreme Court acknowledged the existence of a psychotherapist-patient privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501 for the first time. This Article will make recommendations to lower federal courts that must construe the meaning of "psychotherapist." Part II will provide an overview of federal psychotherapist-patient privilege law prior to Jaffee. Part III will discuss the Court's decision to expand the definition of "psychotherapist" based upon the increased demand for therapy among lower income Americans. Part IV will make three arguments explaining why lower federal courts are free to extend …