Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Brain Overclaim Syndrome (1)
- Breach (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal responsibility (1)
-
- Cultural cognition (1)
- Disparities in academic performance (1)
- Education (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Jury (1)
- Moral heuristic (1)
- Moral intuitions (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- Race (1)
- Research methodology (1)
- Risk perception (1)
- Social norms (1)
- Standardized tests (1)
- Stereotype Threat (1)
- Sucker (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Sucker Norm, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan
The Sucker Norm, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan
All Faculty Scholarship
In this paper, I review the theoretical and empirical scholarship bearing on the notion of being a sucker. I suggest that there is a social norm against being a sucker, and that a number of experimental results could be reconsidered in light of this "sucker norm." First, I establish, at least for the purposes of this analysis, the basic parameters of what it means to be a sucker. Second, I consider when the fear of being a sucker is helpful or normative, and when it seems to be misapplied to cases in which it might actually lead to sub-optimal outcomes. …
Whose Eyes Are You Going To Believe? Scott V. Harris And The Perils Of Cognitive Illiberalism, Dan M. Kahan, David A. Hoffman, Donald Braman
Whose Eyes Are You Going To Believe? Scott V. Harris And The Perils Of Cognitive Illiberalism, Dan M. Kahan, David A. Hoffman, Donald Braman
All Faculty Scholarship
This paper accepts the unusual invitation to see for yourself issued by the Supreme Court in Scott v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 1769 (2007). Scott held that a police officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment when he deliberately rammed his car into that of a fleeing motorist who refused to pull over for speeding and instead attempted to evade the police in a high-speed chase. The majority did not attempt to rebut the arguments of the single Justice who disagreed with its conclusion that no reasonable juror could find the fleeing driver did not pose a deadly risk …
Stereotype Threat: A Case Of Overclaim Syndrome?, Amy L. Wax
Stereotype Threat: A Case Of Overclaim Syndrome?, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
The theory of Stereotype Threat (ST) predicts that, when widely accepted stereotypes allege a group’s intellectual inferiority, fears of confirming these stereotypes cause individuals in the group to underperform relative to their true ability and knowledge. There are now hundreds of published studies purporting to document an impact for ST on the performance of women and racial minorities in a range of situations. This article reviews the literature on stereotype threat, focusing especially on studies investigating the influence of ST in the context of gender. It concludes that there is currently no justification for concluding that ST explains women’s underperformance …
The Irreducibly Normative Nature Of Provocation/Passion, Stephen J. Morse
The Irreducibly Normative Nature Of Provocation/Passion, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Moral Judgment And Moral Heuristics In Breach Of Contract, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan
Moral Judgment And Moral Heuristics In Breach Of Contract, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan
All Faculty Scholarship
Most people think that breaking a promise is immoral, and that a breach of contract is a kind of broken promise. However, the law does not explicitly recognize the moral context of breach of contract. Using a series of web-based questionnaires, we asked subjects to read breach of contract cases and answer questions about the legal, financial, and moral implications of each case. Our results suggest that people are quite sensitive to the moral dimensions of a breach of contract, especially the perceived intentions of the breacher. In the first study, we framed the motivation for a contractor's breach as …