Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Executive Order (2)
- Brandenburg (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Chevron (1)
- Clear and Present Danger (1)
-
- Combat Zone (1)
- Conditional Spending Power Doctrine (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Decision-Maker Model (1)
- Deference (1)
- Deferred Action (1)
- Deferred Enforced Departure (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Dillon's Rule (1)
- Direct Support (1)
- Excluded Income (1)
- FOIA (1)
- Fairness Doctrine (1)
- Federalism (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Government Suppression (1)
- Gross Income (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Home Rule (1)
- Hostile Fire Pay (1)
- IRA (1)
- IRC (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Imminent Danger Pay (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Remarks On Prosecutorial Discretion And Immigration, Shoba S. Wadhia
Remarks On Prosecutorial Discretion And Immigration, Shoba S. Wadhia
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen
A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
President Trump’s executive order rescinding federal funds from “sanctuary jurisdictions” has brought a critical, but overlooked, question of constitutional law to the forefront of the political debate: how does the Spending Clause apply to local governments? The purpose of the Spending Clause is to empower the federal government to bargain with the states to enact policies it cannot enact itself. This power, however, is constrained within the confines of federalism. The Supreme Court has sought to restrict the Spending Clause by crafting the Dole-NFIB framework, a test to determine whether a federal grant has compromised federalism. At its …
Taxing Combat, Samuel Kan
Taxing Combat, Samuel Kan
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
When you are being shot at or dodging landmines you are in a combat zone. Diplomatic niceties aside, these brave warriors are in danger because of the policies of their Government and we must take care of them. Quite frankly, we must act to insure that we do not have a repeat of what happened in Somalia. In Somalia, the families of the soldiers who lost their lives could not receive the benefits that should have gone to them under the Tax Code because the President never declared it a combat zone.
We don’t know exactly where we’re at in …
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amendment has fallen into public scrutiny. Historically, the First Amendment’s “marketplace of ideas” has been a driving source of American political identity; since Brandenburg v. Ohio, the First Amendment protects all speech from government interference unless it causes incitement. The marketplace of ideas allows for the good and the bad ideas to enter American society and ultimately allows the people to decide their own course.
Yet, is the First Amendment truly a tool of social progress? Initially, the First Amendment curtailed war-time dissidents and …