Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Academic freedom (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Disjunctionality (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
-
- Green Bag 2d (1)
- Human subjects research (1)
- Institutional review board (IRB) (1)
- Institutional review board licensing (1)
- Intention (1)
- Intentional action (1)
- Judging (1)
- Kant (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Motive (1)
- Practical reason (1)
- Press (1)
- Rational powers (1)
- SSRN (1)
- Satire (1)
- Speech (1)
- The will (1)
- Unconstitutionality (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Intention And Value, Joseph Raz
Intention And Value, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
The paper sketches the role of reasons and intentions in leading to action with an intention, explaining the way possession of rational powers transforms the formation of intentions. Part One explains how when humans act with an intention they act in the belief that there is value in the action. Part Two explains the relative role of value and intention in “producing” the action, and relates their role to that of motivation.
Irb Licensing, Philip A. Hamburger
Irb Licensing, Philip A. Hamburger
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter examines conflicting norms in the government's licensing of speech and the press on “human-subjects research” through institutional review boards (IRBs). It begins by discussing licensing and why the prohibition of it is so fundamental and prroceeds by providing an overview of the structure of institutional review board licensing. It then highlights the unconstitutionality of IRB laws, arguing that the use of IRBs violates the principles of academic freedom. It asserts that licensing of speech or the press was a method of controlling the press employed by the Inquisition and the Star Chamber, and the First Amendment unequivocally barred …
The Influence Of Juridical Cant On Edificatory Approaches In 21st-Century America, David Pozen
The Influence Of Juridical Cant On Edificatory Approaches In 21st-Century America, David Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
This essay reframes the debate over the "growing disjunction" between legal scholarship and legal practice. Law review articles continue to make the world a better place, the essay stipulates. But are judicial opinions becoming less useful to students and scholars? A rigorous analysis and concrete prescriptions follow.