Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law and Gender

University of Washington School of Law

Sex discrimination

Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

From Office Ladies To Women Warriors?: The Effect Of The Eeol On Japanese Women, Jennifer S. Fan Jan 1999

From Office Ladies To Women Warriors?: The Effect Of The Eeol On Japanese Women, Jennifer S. Fan

Articles

In this Article, Jennifer Fan argues that existing laws in Japan do not adequately protect working women from sex discrimination. Specifically, Fan examines the Equal Employment Opportunity Law (EEOL), a law designed to prevent discrimination against women in the workplace, and concludes that the EEOL is little more than a paper tiger that preserves the status quo. After briefly discussing the legal sources of protection for working women in Japan before the passage of the EEOL, Fan examines the creation of the EEOL, its substantive provisions, and its legal impact. Through her analysis of recent sexual harassment cases in light …


Constitutional Law—Sex Discrimination Under The Equal Rights Amendment—Marchioro V. Chaney, 90 Wn. 2d 298, 582 P.2d 487 (1978), Prob. Juris. Noted, 99 S. Ct. 718 (1979), Irene Hecht Jun 1979

Constitutional Law—Sex Discrimination Under The Equal Rights Amendment—Marchioro V. Chaney, 90 Wn. 2d 298, 582 P.2d 487 (1978), Prob. Juris. Noted, 99 S. Ct. 718 (1979), Irene Hecht

Washington Law Review

Two of several statutes governing the composition and organization of the major political parties in Washington, R.C.W. § 29.42.020 and R.C.W. § 29.42.030, require that certain pairs of party representatives consist of one man and one woman. Following an intraparty dispute various interested persons filed suit, challenging, inter alia, the constitutionality of R.C.W. §§ 29.42.020-.030 under Washington's Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The trial court granted the plaintiffs summary judgment on this claim. In a five to four decision the Washington Supreme Court reversed, upholding the constitutionality of both statutes under the ERA because they did not discriminate on the basis …