Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Anti-transgender bias (1)
- Anti-transgender discrimination (1)
- Custody (1)
- Dobbs (1)
-
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (1)
- Family court (1)
- GDC (1)
- Gender dysphoria (1)
- Gender pay gap (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Judicial bias (1)
- Judicial education reform (1)
- Judicial impartiality (1)
- Labor (1)
- Roe (1)
- Roe v. wade (1)
- Sexual misconduct (1)
- Student discipline (1)
- Student-to-student sexual misconduct (1)
- TRAP laws (1)
- The affirmative approach (1)
- The affirmative model (1)
- Title IX (1)
- Transgender children (1)
- Transgender youth (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Future Of Roe And The Gender Pay Gap: An Empirical Assessment, Itay Ravid, Jonathan Zandberg
The Future Of Roe And The Gender Pay Gap: An Empirical Assessment, Itay Ravid, Jonathan Zandberg
Indiana Law Journal
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law that prohibits nearly all abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy and overruled the holding in Roe v. Wade. Among the many arguments raised in Dobbs in an attempt to overturn Roe, the State of Mississippi argued that due to “the march of progress” in women’s role in society, abortion rights are no longer necessary for women to participate equally in economic life. It has also been argued that there is no empirical support to the relationship between abortion rights and women’s economic success in society. …
In The Best Interests Of Whom?: An Analysis Of Judicial Bias In Custody Disputes Involving Transgender Children, Caden Pociask
In The Best Interests Of Whom?: An Analysis Of Judicial Bias In Custody Disputes Involving Transgender Children, Caden Pociask
Indiana Law Journal
Anti-transgender discrimination and bias loom large in many areas of our society, but perhaps one of the most concerning settings is within the four walls of a courtroom. Evidence suggests that judicial decision making in custody determinations involving transgender children are influenced by anti-transgender bias. In this Note, I examine the current best practice for treating transgender children, the affirmative model, and explore the legal landscape of custody cases involving parents who disagree on how to treat their transgender child. I then suggest a model of comprehensive judicial education reform to help eliminate antitransgender bias from family courts in the …
Adapting Standards Of Judicial Impartiality To Student Discipline In Higher Education: Pitfalls And Potential Learned From Title Ix Adjudications, Brennan Murphy
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.