Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Perbandingan Pengaturan Penawaran Tender (Studi Komparatif: Amerika Serikat, Thailand Dan Indonesia), Areta Artauli Dec 2022

Perbandingan Pengaturan Penawaran Tender (Studi Komparatif: Amerika Serikat, Thailand Dan Indonesia), Areta Artauli

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

This writing discusses about various types of the Tender Offer scheme in the United States as a developed countries, Thailand as a developing countries compared to the tender offer regulation in Indonesia. Tender Offer in Indonesia is stipulated by Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) No 54 /POJK.04/2015 concerning Voluntary Tender Offer and Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 9 /POJK.04/2018 concerning Takeover of Public Company. In general, the three countries have the same understanding and purpose regarding the Tender Offer, namely to protect investors (shareholders) and create a fair capital market activities. This study aims to determine of several differences also …


Tinjauan Yuridis Notifikasi Merger Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha : Studi Kasus Pt Fks Multi Agro Tbk, Muhammad Surya Mustariyakuma Dec 2022

Tinjauan Yuridis Notifikasi Merger Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha : Studi Kasus Pt Fks Multi Agro Tbk, Muhammad Surya Mustariyakuma

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

Mergers, Consolidations and Acquisitions are corporate actions that commonly occur in the business world. The corporate action is a means for companies to strengthen its position in the market and maximize corporate profits. But on the other hand, the Merger, Consolidation and Acquisition also has the potential to lead to anti-competitive practices by joining two large companies so as to dominate the market share and kill other business actors. Law No. 5 of 1999 explicitly regulates the provisions of mergers, consolidations, and acquisitions, namely articles 28 and 29. Furthermore, the technical provisions regarding merger notification are regulated in Government Regulation …


The Shifting Tides Of Merger Litigation, Matthew D. Cain, Jill E. Fisch, Steven Davidoff Solomon, Randall S. Thomas Jan 2018

The Shifting Tides Of Merger Litigation, Matthew D. Cain, Jill E. Fisch, Steven Davidoff Solomon, Randall S. Thomas

All Faculty Scholarship

In 2015, Delaware made several important changes to its laws concerning merger litigation. These changes, which were made in response to a perception that levels of merger litigation were too high and that a substantial proportion of merger cases were not providing value, raised the bar, making it more difficult for plaintiffs to win a lawsuit challenging a merger and more difficult for plaintiffs’ counsel to collect a fee award.

We study what has happened in the courts in response to these changes. We find that the initial effect of the changes has been to decrease the volume of merger …


Buying Monopoly: Antitrust Limits On Damages For Externally Acquired Patents, Erik N. Hovenkamp, Herbert J. Hovenkamp Jan 2017

Buying Monopoly: Antitrust Limits On Damages For Externally Acquired Patents, Erik N. Hovenkamp, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

The “monopoly” authorized by the Patent Act refers to the exclusionary power of individual patents. That is not the same thing as the acquisition of individual patent rights into portfolios that dominate a market, something that the Patent Act never justifies and that the antitrust laws rightfully prohibit.

Most patent assignments are procompetitive and serve to promote the efficient commercialization of patented inventions. However, patent acquisitions may also be used to combine substitute patents from external patentees, giving the acquirer an unearned monopoly position in the relevant technology market. A producer requires only one of the substitutes, but by acquiring …


Legal Factors In The Acquisition Of A United State Corporation: Litigation By Hostile Targets, Johan E. Droogmans Jan 1987

Legal Factors In The Acquisition Of A United State Corporation: Litigation By Hostile Targets, Johan E. Droogmans

LLM Theses and Essays

Acquisitions of United States corporations have become increasingly complex takeover contests, where bidders and target corporations are forced into offensive and defensive litigation strategies to protect their respective interests. Targets often assert that the bidders have violated federal or state securities laws, federal antitrust laws, federal margin regulations, federal and state regulatory systems, and federal anti-racketeering laws. These lawsuits are primarily based on the principal federal regulation of takeovers in section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Williams Act. Target litigation is customary, but entails certain disadvantages; a lawsuit rarely stops an offer, is expensive, …