Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law and Economics

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Journal

2010

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Law

The 8% Solution - Or How Good Are The Calculation Economics By The Federal Circuit In Lucent V. Microsoft?, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 797 (2010), W. Lesser Jan 2010

The 8% Solution - Or How Good Are The Calculation Economics By The Federal Circuit In Lucent V. Microsoft?, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 797 (2010), W. Lesser

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Lucent v. Microsoft brought to the fore again the complexity of infringement damage estimates. Differences in approaches were laid open in this case with the trial court jury settling $358 million in damages against Microsoft and the appeals court striking down the value as lacking substantial evidence. Damages were established on the “reasonable royalty” basis for a product which was neither licensed nor sold. This article contends that the appeals court took too narrow a view of economics in its analysis of the software sector. Specifically, the court seems to have applied a “perfect competition” model to a sector which …