Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Police (3)
- Burger Court (2)
- Searches (2)
- Seizures (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
-
- Warren Court (2)
- Book review (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Consitutional violations (1)
- Custodial interrogation (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Douglas v. California (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Griffin v. Illinois (1)
- Informants (1)
- Kirby v. Illinois (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- McCray v. Illinois (1)
- Mirand v. Arizona (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Western Kentucky University (1)
- Zeisel (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Review Of "The Limits Of Law Enforcement" By Hans Zeisel, Bennett L. Gershman
Review Of "The Limits Of Law Enforcement" By Hans Zeisel, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Ua12/8 Departmental Newsletter, Wku Police
Ua12/8 Departmental Newsletter, Wku Police
WKU Archives Records
WKU Police departmental newsletters for 1983.
The Warren Court (Was It Really So Defense-Minded?), The Burger Court (Is It Really So Prosecution-Oriented?), And Police Investigatory Practices, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
In one sense the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure may be said to. have been launched by the 1956 case of Griffin v. Illinois (establishing an indigent criminal defendant's right to a free transcript on appeal, at least under certain circumstances) and to have been significantly advanced by two 1963 cases: Gideon v. Wainwright (entitling an indigent defendant to free counsel, at least in serious criminal cases) and Douglas v. California (requiring a state to provide an indigent with counsel on his first appeal from a criminal conviction). But these were not the cases that plunged the Warren …
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
Richard Nixon's criticism of the Warren Court during the 1968 presidential campaign centered largely on the Court's handling of cases involving criminal rights. According to candidate Nixon, the Court had gone much too far. It had twisted the Constitution to serve its own purposes, created a maze of legal technicalities that worked only to frustrate legitimate law enforcement efforts, and so weakened "the peace forces as against the criminal forces in this country" as to be largely responsible for the sharp rise in crime that had occurred in the sixties. What had to be done, continued Nixon, was to appoint …