Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (2)
- Confessions (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Custodial interrogations (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
-
- Miranda v. Arizona (2)
- Police (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Bugging device (1)
- California Constitution (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Conscientious objectors (1)
- Convicted felons (1)
- Corrections law (1)
- Davis v. North Carolina (1)
- Disenfranchisement (1)
- Due process (1)
- Elections law (1)
- Electronic eavesdropping (1)
- Electronic surveillance (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Ex-convicts (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Infamous crimes (1)
- Invasion of privacy (1)
- Judicature (1)
- Otsuka v. Hite (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My first task is to explain to some degree the nature of the problem embodied in our title. This book has been designated as "Escobedo-The Second Round." What we will be discussing is a series of cases, decided in June, 1966, the most noteworthy of which is Miranda v. Arizona [384 U.S. 436 (1966)]. In these cases, the United States Supreme Court prescribed a new set of standards governing the introduction in evidence of statements obtained from the defendant through police interrogation. Actually, to a degree these standards were not entirely new. They had been suggested, at least in part, …
The Ex-Convict's Right To Vote, David H. Getches
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Commenting on why it has taken the United States so long to apply "the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to counsel to the proceedings in the stationhouse as well as to those in the courtroom" - as the Supreme Court did in Miranda v. Arizona - this author notes that, "To a large extent this is so because here, as elsewhere, there has been a wide gap between the principles to which we aspire and the practices we actually employ."
Wiretapping And Bugging: Striking A Balance Between Privacy And Law Enforcement, Kent Greenawalt
Wiretapping And Bugging: Striking A Balance Between Privacy And Law Enforcement, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
The conflict between individual privacy and the needs of law enforcement occurs at a number of points in our system of criminal justice. It is not unique to wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping, but the competing claims in that area do have their own special character. They are qualitatively different from those in regard to, say, confessions. The kinds of crimes and criminals affected are different, as are the relevant assertions about individual freedom.
Law enforcement officials, almost to a man, consider wiretapping and eavesdropping valuable weapons in the fight against crime. They are most helpful in regard to consensual crimes …