Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections
University of Michigan Law School
- Keyword
-
- African Americans (1)
- Baltimore (1)
- California v. Ciraolo (1)
- Cell phones (1)
- Criminal intent (1)
-
- Criminal responsibility (1)
- Depraved heart (1)
- Digital Receiver Technology (1)
- Dirtboxes (1)
- Electronic surveillance (1)
- Florida v. Riley (1)
- Gray (Freddie) (1)
- Homicide (1)
- Involuntary manslaughter (1)
- Katz v. United States (1)
- Maryland Declaration of Rights (1)
- Mens rea (1)
- Model Penal Code (1)
- Mosby (Marilyn) (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Police officers (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Riley v. California (1)
- SingRays (1)
- U.S. Marshals Service (1)
- United States v. Jones (1)
- United States v. Knotts (1)
- Warrants (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mens Rea, Criminal Responsibility, And The Death Of Freddie Gray, Michael Serota
Mens Rea, Criminal Responsibility, And The Death Of Freddie Gray, Michael Serota
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
Who (if anyone) is criminally responsible for the death of Freddie Gray, the 25-year-old African-American man who died from injuries suffered while in the custody of Baltimore police? This question has been at the forefront of the extensive coverage of Gray’s death, which has inspired a national discussion about law enforcement’s relationship with black communities. But it is also a question that may never be fairly resolved for reasons wholly unrelated to the topic of community policing, with which Gray’s death has become synonymous. What may ultimately hamper the administration of justice in the prosecution of the police officers involved …
Spies In The Skies: Dirtboxes And Airplane Electronic Surveillance, Brian L. Owsley
Spies In The Skies: Dirtboxes And Airplane Electronic Surveillance, Brian L. Owsley
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
Electronic surveillance in the digital age is essentially a cat-and-mouse game between governmental agencies that are developing new techniques and technologies for surveillance, juxtaposed against privacy rights advocates who voice concerns about such technologies. In November 2014, there was a discovery of a new twist on a relatively old theme. Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Marshals Service was running a surveillance program employing devices—dirtboxes—that gather all cell phone numbers in the surrounding area. Other federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Agency, Immigration and Custom Enforcement, and the Department of Homeland Security, are also documented to have …