Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 28 of 28
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right To Strike In Essential Services Under United States Labor Law, Marley S. Weiss
The Right To Strike In Essential Services Under United States Labor Law, Marley S. Weiss
Marley S. Weiss
SUMMARY: I. Introduction. II. A Brief History of U.S. Collective Labor Relations Laws. III. The Structure of Labor-Management Relations in The U.S. IV. The Right to Strike. V. Private Sector “Essential Services” Provisions: LMRA National. VI. Conclusion.
The Right To Strike In Essential Services Under United States Labor Law, Marley S. Weiss
The Right To Strike In Essential Services Under United States Labor Law, Marley S. Weiss
Faculty Scholarship
SUMMARY: I. Introduction. II. A Brief History of U.S. Collective Labor Relations Laws. III. The Structure of Labor-Management Relations in The U.S. IV. The Right to Strike. V. Private Sector “Essential Services” Provisions: LMRA National. VI. Conclusion.
The Shore Line Status Quo Requirement, Daniel R. Elliott Iii
The Shore Line Status Quo Requirement, Daniel R. Elliott Iii
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation Union. It discusses the decisions following 1969 that weakened the Shore Line holding and thus undermined one of the principal purposes behind the Railway Labor Act. Part I lays out the background of the Railway Labor Act status quo requirements. Part II delves into the Shore Line decision. Part III explains the effect subsequent status quo decisions have had on the Shore Line holding. Part IV discusses related case law that also impacted the Shore Line holding. And finally, Part V points …
The Railway Labor Act Of 1926 And Modern-Day Airline Labor Strife: Progress Toward Labor Peace Begins With Overruling Williams V. Jacksonville Terminal Co., Mark A. Schuler
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment argues that Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co. either should be overruled, or should be appropriately limited to the fact-specific setting under which it was decided. To develop this thesis, Part II of this Comment will discuss both the history of labor unrest which drove Congress to pass the RLA and the design features of the RLA legislation which facilitate an atmosphere of cooperative bargaining through which the RLA dispute resolution system operates. Part III will discuss the first impression Williams case, wherein the Supreme Court gave an overly restrictive interpretation to the RLA, and will also discuss the …
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Christopher L. Sagers
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Christopher L. Sagers
Michigan Law Review
This Note contends that the RLA prohibits due process review and further argues that such a result is constitutional. Part I examines the statutory language of the RLA itself and contends that it limits district court review to the three statutory grounds. Part II argues that the Supreme Court's opinion in Sheehan reaffirms this interpretation because the Court's language unmistakably conveys an intent to bar due process review. Part III explains that such a limitation does not violate the Constitution. The only constitutional provision that could be implicated in an RLA proceeding, the right of procedural due process, is protected …
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Chris Sagers
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Chris Sagers
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The federal government regulates disputes between organized labor and management in a wide range of private industries. Most disputes are governed by the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA), which both protects the rights of management and organized labor and establishes a comprehensive scheme of dispute resolution. The Railway Labor Act (RLA), however, creates a regime unique to the railroad and airline industries. It requires that certain claims between the covered employers -- known in the RLA as “carriers” -- and their employees be settled by submission to the RLA statutory arbitration scheme. Under this scheme, parties must resolve disputes “in the …
The Legacy Of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension Between Individual Employment Rights And The New Deal Collective Bargaining System, Katherine V.W. Stone
The Legacy Of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension Between Individual Employment Rights And The New Deal Collective Bargaining System, Katherine V.W. Stone
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Labor Arbitration Awards: A Second Look At Enterprise Wheel And Its Progeny, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Judicial Review Of Labor Arbitration Awards: A Second Look At Enterprise Wheel And Its Progeny, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Logic, so the cliche goes, is not the life of the law. But logic is very much like the DNA of the law-the structural principle without which all is sprawl and muddle. In the last ten years a controversy has raged over the role of the labor arbitrator in issuing awards, and the role of the courts in reviewing and enforcing those awards. This controversy has largely taken the form of a continuing debate among scholars and practicing arbitrators at the annual meetings of the National Academy of Arbitrators. With due respect to the thoughtful and experienced persons who have …
Labor Law--Until Congress Acts, Secondary Picketing By Unions Subject To The Railway Labor Act Is Protected Against State Proscription--Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen V. Jacksonville Terminal Company, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In a major labor dispute between the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and the Florida East Coast Railway Company (FEC), the parties, having exhausted all the procedures of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) for resolving a major dispute, resorted to self-help remedies. FEC unilaterally changed its operating employees' rates of pay, rules, and working conditions; and the union, in turn, called a strike and picketed peacefully at locations where FEC operated, including the premises of the Jacksonville Terminal Company, which served a number of other railroads. The avowed objective of the union's picketing was to cause the other carriers using the …
Transportation Strike Control Legislation: A Congressional Challenge, Arthur M. Wisehart
Transportation Strike Control Legislation: A Congressional Challenge, Arthur M. Wisehart
Michigan Law Review
The necessity of protecting the public interest in continuity of transportation services while at the same time preserving the institution of collective bargaining presents a serious dilemma which the statutory framework devised during the first third of this century now seems inadequate to resolve. Indeed, most crippling strikes have occurred after statutory mechanisms for dispute resolution have been exhausted. This Article will trace the history of transportation labor legislation, outline the shortcomings of present procedures for dispute resolution, evaluate various alternatives for statutory reform, and propose permanent corrective legislation which would avoid the necessity of submitting each dispute for congressional …
Adjusting The Adjustment Board: Jurisdictional And Judicial Review Amendments To Section 3 Of The Railway Labor Act
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Labor Law-Nrab Awards In Work Assignment Disputes Are Unenforceable Unless The Board Has Considered The Interest Of The Competing Union-Order Of R.R. Telegraphers V. Union Pac. R.R., Michigan Law Review
Labor Law-Nrab Awards In Work Assignment Disputes Are Unenforceable Unless The Board Has Considered The Interest Of The Competing Union-Order Of R.R. Telegraphers V. Union Pac. R.R., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The Order of Railroad Telegraphers filed a complaint with the National Railroad Adjustment Board (NRAB), alleging that the Union Pacific Railroad had violated its collective bargaining agreement with the union by assigning work covered by that agreement to members of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks. The Telegraphers sought damages in the form of back pay, but did not demand job reinstatement. Notice of the Telegrapher's claim was served on the Clerks who declined to appear before the Board since they viewed the dispute as one which involved only an interpretation of the contract between the Telegraphers and the …
Labor Law- Railway Labor Act-Union Referendum Provisions As An Indication Of Failure To Bargain In Good Faith, Paul D. Borman
Labor Law- Railway Labor Act-Union Referendum Provisions As An Indication Of Failure To Bargain In Good Faith, Paul D. Borman
Michigan Law Review
In negotiations arising out of a "major dispute" under the Railway Labor Act, defendant's union representatives were prohibited by a provision in the union constitution from reaching any final agreement without the proposals having first been adopted by a majority vote of the union membership. At the bargaining table, the union representatives presented no specific proposals or counter-proposals; when a management offer was made and presented to the union membership, the representatives refused either to sign it or to recommend its adoption. The management proposal was defeated at the union referendum, and a strike date was set. Plaintiff railroad sought …
Labor Law - Norris - Laguardia Act - Federal Courts Without Jurisdiction To Enjoin Strike In Support Of Demand That No Jobs Be Abolished Without Railiway Union's Consent, David G. Hill
Michigan Law Review
Respondent railroad sought authority from the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission to reduce the number of its station agents. Petitioner union not only contested but also demanded of the railroad that the following provision be added to the existing collective bargaining agreement: "No position in existence on December 3, 1957, will be abolished or discontinued except by agreement between the carrier and the organization." The commission thereafter found maintenance of the particular jobs to be wasteful and issued a mandatory order directing their abandonment. When the union prepared to strike in support of its demanded contract provision, the railroad sought …
Constitutional Law- Civil Rights - Union Use Of Dues For Political Action, Paul Hanke
Constitutional Law- Civil Rights - Union Use Of Dues For Political Action, Paul Hanke
Michigan Law Review
Defendant unions under the authority of section 2, Eleventh of the Railway Labor Act obtained union shop agreements from defendant railroads. Non-union employees sought to enjoin enforcement of the agreements because the unions used periodic dues, fees, and assessments to support political doctrines and candidates opposed by plaintiffs. The trial court dismissed for failure to state a cause of action, but the Supreme Court of Georgia overruled the dismissal and remanded. The lower court then ruled that petitioners were denied constitutional liberties and issued the injunction. On appeal, held, affirmed. Enforcement of union shop contracts requiring employees to pay …
Lecht: Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation, Sylvester Petro
Lecht: Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation, Sylvester Petro
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation. By Leonard A. Lecht.
Labor Law - Lmra - Duty Of Certified Union To Represent Bargaining Unit Fairly, Edward W. Powers S.Ed.
Labor Law - Lmra - Duty Of Certified Union To Represent Bargaining Unit Fairly, Edward W. Powers S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Local N, composed entirely of Negroes, and Local W, composed entirely of whites, and both affiliated with the same international union, had been certified by the National Labor Relations Board as the joint bargaining representatives for the bargaining unit. Subsequent to this certification, the two locals allegedly agreed between themselves that they would be represented by one bargaining committee elected by a majority vote of the unit, and that there would be but one line of seniority in any agreement negotiated by this committee. The committee which was elected consisted solely of members of Local W. It …
The New Union Shop Provision In The Railway Labor Act
The New Union Shop Provision In The Railway Labor Act
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Labor Law - Union Shop - Discharge Of Employee For Refusal To Accept Union Membership, Sherman A. Itlaner S.Ed.
Labor Law - Union Shop - Discharge Of Employee For Refusal To Accept Union Membership, Sherman A. Itlaner S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her employer. The union then wrote her a letter welcoming her into membership. She replied that although she had tendered dues and initiation fee she was not joining the union. The union thereupon requested her employer to discharge her pursuant to the provisions of their union shop agreement signed under the 1951 amendment to the Railway Labor Act. After going through the regular grievance procedure the matter came before the arbitrator for .final settlement. Held, the union was entitled to demand the …
The Nature Of A Grievance In Labor Relations, George Rose
The Nature Of A Grievance In Labor Relations, George Rose
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
State V. Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
State V. Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
State, as owner of a railroad, was not subject to collective bargaining provisions of federal Railway Labor Act and contract reached as a result of collective bargaining between state board and labor union was invalid.
Labor Law, Leon H. Wallace
Administrative Law-Prior Resort Doctrine-Resort To The Railroad Adjustment Board Before Court Action, William H. Buchanan
Administrative Law-Prior Resort Doctrine-Resort To The Railroad Adjustment Board Before Court Action, William H. Buchanan
Michigan Law Review
The decision in a recent case to the effect that a dispute concerning the construction of a contract of employment between a labor union and a railroad may be adjusted by carrying it before the Railroad Adjustment Board, or by carrying it directly to the courts makes this an apt time to examine the applicability of the doctrine of prior resort to disputes. covered by the Railway Labor Act. Such an examination seems especially necessary in view of the fact that in such cases the courts have not even mentioned the doctrine.
Abstracts, Katharine Loomis
Abstracts, Katharine Loomis
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
The Labor Relations Acts-Their Effect On Industrial Warfare, Lennart Larson
The Labor Relations Acts-Their Effect On Industrial Warfare, Lennart Larson
Michigan Law Review
This article is addressed to the query whether the labor relations acts have any effect on the ends and means of labor warfare. During the hey-day of the NIRA, decisions may be found which indicated that industrial warfare for the objects within the regulatory power of the code authorities was unlawful. Strikes and picketing were enjoined where carried on for higher wages and hours, objects which were thought properly to be for code authorities to adjust. Those decisions were of dubious soundness, but they suggest an argument which may be advanced under the labor relations acts. The NIRA was of …
The Railway Labor Act And The National Labor Relations Act--A Comparison, Harry H. Byrer
The Railway Labor Act And The National Labor Relations Act--A Comparison, Harry H. Byrer
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Organized Labor And The Recovery Act, Emmett B. Mcnatt
Organized Labor And The Recovery Act, Emmett B. Mcnatt
Michigan Law Review
The enactment of the National Industrial Recovery Act last June inevitably has brought to the fore a number of questions which as yet remain unanswered, including those connected with the application and interpretation of Section 7(a) of the Recovery Act, the subject of this article. Under this section, hailed by labor as a "new Magna Charta," employees are apparently given two interrelated rights - the right to organize with no discrimination against them by employers as a result thereof, and the right to collective bargaining through representatives of their own choosing. Employers are prohibited from interfering with such rights through …