Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Labor and Employment Law

University of Richmond Law Review

1976

EEOC

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Critique: A Defendant's View, Robert H. Patterson Jr., J. Robert Brame Iii Jan 1976

Critique: A Defendant's View, Robert H. Patterson Jr., J. Robert Brame Iii

University of Richmond Law Review

In ten years, employers have become subject to an imposing body of law regulating employment practices. This law has created two immense problems for the employer. First, enforcement of these laws is frequently capricious, arbitrary and unfair. Second, recent decisions strip the employer of his most reliable methods for selecting skilled, productive workers and threaten the efficiency of American industry.


Critique: A Plaintiff's View, Henry L. Marsh Iii Jan 1976

Critique: A Plaintiff's View, Henry L. Marsh Iii

University of Richmond Law Review

No greater challenge confronts persons seeking to enjoy America's promise of "equality and justice for all" than that of enforcing the clear congressional mandate that all forms of discrimination based on race, religion, nationality and sex be eliminated. It follows then that the continued existence of such discrimination constitutes a great danger to the moral and economic well-being of our nation.


A Guide To The Law Of Fair Employment, Benjamin Werne Jan 1976

A Guide To The Law Of Fair Employment, Benjamin Werne

University of Richmond Law Review

In the field of civil rights, there are broad, cumulative remedies available to the aggrieved party. The fabric of these remedies is an amalgam of various and varying statutes, judicial holdings, administrative determinations and arbitral awards. The following article attempts a distillation of current law-much of which is further complicated by conflicting decisions.