Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Re Eastern Provincial Airways (1963) Ltd And Canadian Airline Employees' Association, Innis Christie Sep 1979

Re Eastern Provincial Airways (1963) Ltd And Canadian Airline Employees' Association, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union Grievance alleging improper filling of job vacancy.

In the summer of 1978, Watters and Miller, traffic agents in Saint John, New Brunswick, applied for inter-base transfers to Montreal. That autumn a permanent vacancy occurred for which both Ms. Miller and Mr. Watters met all requirements except, possibly, the language requirement. Both were given a "test" by the employer and, in the result, neither was given the transfer re-quested. According to Watters' testimony, Ms. Miller initiated the grievance now before me but, as Watters put it, "it was explained to her [presumably by the union] that it would go in …


The Board Of Directors Of The Halifax Infirmary Hospital V The Halifax Infirmary Local Of The Nova Scotia Nurses' Union, Innis Christie Aug 1979

The Board Of Directors Of The Halifax Infirmary Hospital V The Halifax Infirmary Local Of The Nova Scotia Nurses' Union, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

APPLICATION having been made to the Labour Relations Board (Nova Scotia) on January 19, 1979, pursuant to Section 26 of the Trade Union Act by adding to the classifications of employees excluded from the bargaining unit contained in L.R.B. No. 1996, dated September 18, 1973, the following: Unit Supervisor, Head Nurse (Special Unit), and Head Nurse, other than Head Nurse, Operating Room;


Eastern Shore Memorial Hospital Local Of The Nova Scotia Nurses' Union V Eastern Shore Memorial Hospital, Innis Christie Aug 1979

Eastern Shore Memorial Hospital Local Of The Nova Scotia Nurses' Union V Eastern Shore Memorial Hospital, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

APPLICATION having been made to the Labour Relations Board (Nova Scotia) on January 31, 1979, for Certification of the Applicant as Bargaining Agent pursuant to the Trade Union Act;


United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America, Local 1028 V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie Aug 1979

United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America, Local 1028 V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

On February 14, 1979, the Board issued an order dismissing the application [sic] for certification in this matter and stated that reasons were to follow. On April 11 the Board issued L.R.B. No. 2523, in which, with full reasons for our decision, we directed Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited to cease and desist from breaching Section 51 (1) (a) of the Nova Scotia Trade Union Act by committing the unfair labour practices specified in that order. Our intent here is to set out in similar detail our reasons for the order on February 14. Not all of the many issues of …


Imp Manufacturing Employees Association V Imp Group Limited, Innis Christie Jul 1979

Imp Manufacturing Employees Association V Imp Group Limited, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

APPLICATION having been made to the Labour Relations Board (Nova Scotia) on May 18, 1979, for Certification of the Applicant as Bargaining Agent pursuant to the Trade Union Act;


United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie Apr 1979

United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

A COMPLAINT of Unfair Labour Practice having been made to the Labour Relations Board (Nova Scotia) on February 29, 1978, alleging that Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited violated Section 51 (1) (a) and 5 (3) (a) of the Trade Union Act;


Re Air Canada And Canadian Airline Flight Attendants Association, Innis Christie Mar 1979

Re Air Canada And Canadian Airline Flight Attendants Association, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance over unjust discharge. The grievor was a flight attendant. The grievor was terminated on the last day of her six month probationary period. Being on probation, no grounds needed to be given but the letter discharging her said that she had been found performing below acceptable standards on three (in-flight performance, grooming and attendance) of the four (additionally, personal conduct) categories of evaluation. The union argued that there were other criteria which had set the grievor down as a "marked person" which had nothing to do with the four categories. The union also argued that the grievor was not …