Law Commons^™

Labor Law--Labor-Management Relations Act--"Captive Audience" Doctrine, George B. Berridge S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The day before a representation election was to be held at respondents plant the employees were assembled on the premises during working hours to hear an anti-union address by respondent's president. The union requested but was refused a similar opportunity to address the employees, and it appeared that respondent had in force a rule prohibiting union solicitation on company property. The National Labor Relations Board decided that although the contents of the president's speech were within the privilege of section 8(c) of the amended National Labor Relations Act, in refusing the union's request respondent had applied its no-solicitation rule in …

Labor Law-Legality Of Employer's Use Of Lockout, Norman M. Spindelman S.Ed., William K. Davenport S.Ed

Michigan Law Review

One of the employer's traditional weapons against the economic power of unions is the lockout. Since the central economic element involved in strikebreaking is that the operation of the plant and equipment is as important to labor as labor is to the operation of the plant and equipment, the lockout is one of the simplest methods of strikebreaking or of resisting union demands. This is so because in the endurance contest which ensues the economic resources of the employer are likely to be greater than those of the employee. Just as there are restrictions on union use of the strike, …

Labor Law-Labor-Management Relations Act-Relationship Of Remedies Under Title I And Title Iii, Wendell B. Will S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner, a local of the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, established a picket line at respondent's lumber mill and notified other locals to refuse to unload respondent's products. Petitioner sought to force respondent to assign certain jobs to its men. Respondent's policy had been to use its own employees for the disputed work. As a result of petitioner's action respondent was forced to suspend its operations. Respondent filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB alleging union violation of section 8(b)(4)(D) of the LMRA. After some time the NLRB determined that petitioner's men were not entitled to the disputed …

Smith: Labor Law: Cases And Materials, Harry Shulman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of LABOR LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS. By Russell A. Smith.

Union Powers And Workers' Rights, Clyde W. Summers

Michigan Law Review

The plight of the Highland group is not the product of labor strife, but of collective bargaining; not of employer discrimination, but of union power. It symbolizes in an extreme form the potential fate of an individual worker within the structure of unionization and collective bargaining. It sharply reminds us that contracts apply to workers, and that unions consist of members. It warns us that we must not become so obsessed with the glamor of studying mass action that we ignore the fate of those who make up the mass and in whose name the action is taken.

Such cases …

Union Powers And Workers' Rights, Clyde W. Summers

Michigan Law Review

The plight of the Highland group is not the product of labor strife, but of collective bargaining; not of employer discrimination, but of union power. It symbolizes in an extreme form the potential fate of an individual worker within the structure of unionization and collective bargaining. It sharply reminds us that contracts apply to workers, and that unions consist of members. It warns us that we must not become so obsessed with the glamor of studying mass action that we ignore the fate of those who make up the mass and in whose name the action is taken.

Such cases …

Silverberg: How To Take A Case Before The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of HOW TO TAKE A CASE BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD By Louis G. Silverberg.

Labor Law - "Channeling" The Duty To Bargain - Effect Of Violation Of "No-Strike" Clause In Existing Agreement, John F. Buchman S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjusting grievances, including arbitration as the final step, and contained a no-strike clause. Disputes arose concerning action taken by the employer affecting working schedules, overtime work, and other conditions of employment without consulting the union; and disciplinary measures were taken against certain employees in pursuance of the new working rules. The union finally called a strike, without filing grievances according to the contract procedure on the disputes which were the immediate causes of the strike. The employer discontinued hearings on two pending grievances and refused to negotiate …

The Taft-Hartley Act And State Jurisdiction Over Labor Relations, Russell A. Smith

Michigan Law Review

Of the many problems arising out of the Taft-Hartley Act, not the least perplexing is the determination of its impact upon state jurisdiction over labor relations. The importance of the question is obvious, and is illustrated by Judge Shepard's reaction. Administrators of state labor relations acts and state courts, like the California court, must determine what position to take with respect to their jurisdiction. Employers and unions must make a like determination, and must also come to some conclusion as to the applicability of state law as reflected in other statutes and in judicial decisions. Those charged with the administration …

The Divided Supreme Court, 1944-1945, C. Herman Pritchett

Michigan Law Review

The United States Supreme Court has in recent years been supplying fascinating material for students interested in the interplay of personal and institutional factors in the judicial decision-making process. Contrary to the more restrictive practices of some other legal systems, the traditions of the American judiciary have never insisted that justices sitting en banc should hide the existence of division among themselves behind a facade of pretended unanimity. Justices who dissent from a decision of their brethren have been permitted to say so, and to give their reasons. This practice has had an immeasurably great effect in facilitating the growth …

Assignments - Injunctions - Enforceability In Equity Of Partial Wage Assignments, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The complainant, a milling and textile company employing about 2,000 men, brought this action to enjoin certain wage assignments made by 1,100 of its employees. The assignments, voluntarily made to the respondent union (certified by the National Labor Relations Board), directed the company to deduct from each laborer's pay at the end of every month the amount of his union dues. The complainant had previously refused to sign a contract with the union which embodied a "check-off" provision. Held, the mass assignment being prejudicial to the rights of the complainant, the injunction should be granted. Pacific Mills v. Textile …

Labor Law - Picketing To Compel Breach Of A Statutory Duty - Conflict Between Norris-Laguardia Act And National Labor Relations Act, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Petitioners, a corporate employer and an A. F. of L. union whose membership included all the company's active employees, brought suit in a federal court against a C. I. O. union, whose membership included two of petitioner's employees on strike, to enjoin respondents' picketing. The purpose of the picketing was to coerce the employer and employees to violate the agreement entered into with the petitioner union as exclusive bargaining agency and to cause the employer to rescind its recognition of that union. The trial court granted an injunction against all picketing on findings that the agreement between the employer and …

Labor Law - Rights And Duties Under The National Labor Relations Act- Effect Of Norris-Laguardia Act, Lennart V. Larson

Michigan Law Review

Defendants, members of a C.I.O. organization, petitioned for an election in plaintiff corporation's factory in order to determine the representatives of the employees for the purposes of collective bargaining. An employees' association, a union the members of which were restricted to employees of the corporation, received a majority of votes and was certified by the National Labor Relations Board as bargaining representative. Nevertheless, the C.I.O. union called a strike, demanding sole bargaining privileges and a closed shop. Picketing, violence and intimidation are alleged, as a result of which plaintiff's factory has had to shut down. Held, plaintiff is entitled …