Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Labor law (2)
- Title VII (2)
- 13th Amendment (1)
- 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (1)
-
- ADA (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Breastfeeding (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Childcare (1)
- Children's rights (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Condition (1)
- Conduct (1)
- Counseling (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Dietetics (1)
- Dietician (1)
- Dietitian (1)
- Domestic worker (1)
- Domestic workers bill of rights (1)
- EEOC (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- FMLA (1)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (1)
- Federal labor law (1)
- Forced Labor Act (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Health law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Thirteenth Amendment And One Hundred And Fifty Years Of Struggle To Criminalize Slavery: A First Amendment Challenge To The Forced Labor Act (18 U.S.C. § 1589), Niles Stefan Illich
The Thirteenth Amendment And One Hundred And Fifty Years Of Struggle To Criminalize Slavery: A First Amendment Challenge To The Forced Labor Act (18 U.S.C. § 1589), Niles Stefan Illich
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.
Maternity Rights: A Comparative View Of Mexico And The United States, Roberto Rosas
Maternity Rights: A Comparative View Of Mexico And The United States, Roberto Rosas
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Women play a large role in the workplace and require additional protection during pregnancy, childbirth, and while raising children. This article compares how Mexico and the United States have approached the issue of maternity rights and benefits. First, Mexico provides eighty-four days of paid leave to mothers, while the United States provides unpaid leave for up to twelve weeks. Second, Mexico allows two thirty-minute breaks a day for breastfeeding, while the United States allows a reasonable amount of time per day to breastfeed. Third, Mexico provides childcare to most federal employees, while the United States provides daycares to a small …
A “License To Kale”—Free Speech Challenges To Occupational Licensing Of Nutrition And Dietetics, Taylor J. Newman, Angela E. Surrett
A “License To Kale”—Free Speech Challenges To Occupational Licensing Of Nutrition And Dietetics, Taylor J. Newman, Angela E. Surrett
St. Mary's Law Journal
State licensing of medical professions has occurred for over a century. Recently, these licensure statutes have been subject to First Amendment challenges, alleging occupational licensure impermissibly restricts freedom of speech. This Comment addresses these free speech challenges, arguing occupational licensure statutes, at least for medical professions, only incidentally impacts free speech—if at all—by permissibly regulating medical professional conduct necessarily requiring speech. Within, the authors ultimately describe, demonstrate, and recommend a legal framework, the other factor/personal nexus approach. This approach helps determine the point at which speech becomes regulable professional conduct subject to licensing, utilizing the nutrition and dietetics profession, and …
Undocumented Domestic Workers: A Penumbra In The Workforce, Abigail A. Roman
Undocumented Domestic Workers: A Penumbra In The Workforce, Abigail A. Roman
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.