Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Garmon V. San Diego Bldg. Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Garmon V. San Diego Bldg. Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Appellants were properly held liable for damages sustained by the company when appellants' conduct in picketing and using language to install fear of injury induced building contractors to discontinue their patronage of the company.
Rubin V. American Sportsmen Television Equity Soc. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Rubin V. American Sportsmen Television Equity Soc. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Promoters were entitled to preliminary injunctions to prevent a corporation and individual wrestlers from picketing where the corporation was not a bona fide labor organization, and the individual wrestlers' labor activities were not protected.
Sommer V. Metal Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Sommer V. Metal Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Because federal law did not protect a union's picketing and a secondary boycott that it originated, a California trial court had the power under the Jurisdictional Strike Act of California to preliminarily enjoin the union's activities.
Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A preliminary injunction enjoining picketing was proper where the case was not necessarily close on its facts when the evidence most favorable to the party granted the injunction was reviewed, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A preliminary injunction enjoining picketing was proper where the case was not necessarily close on its facts when the evidence most favorable to the party granted the injunction was reviewed, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
It was unlawful for two labor unions that were involved in a controversy as to which one should represent the employees to picket outside of the employer, so the picketers were lawfully arrested and their writs of habeas corpus were denied.