Law Commons^™

Re Izaak Walton Killam Hospital For Children And Nsgeu, Loc 22a, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging breach of the collective agreement between the parties effective April 1, 1989 to March 31, 1992, and continuing in effect at all relevant dates, in that the employer does not pay standby pay in accordance with art. 13.01 to employees who are required to carry beepers during unpaid meal breaks. The union requested that, as of April, 1992, all such employees be compensated in accordance with art. 13.01.

Judicial Review Of Labor Arbitration Awards: Practices, Policies, And Sanctions, Mark Berger

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Godwin), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The grievances which are the subject of this arbitration were filed under the Postal Services Continuation Act, 1991, S.C. 1991, c. 35, which was passed to bring an end to the postal strike of August and September, 1991. The Act directed the employer to continue or resume postal operations, required every employee to continue or resume the duties of his or her employment, extended the relevant collective agreements to July 31, 1993, and provided for the amendment and revision of the collective agreements by compulsory arbitration. Excepted from period of statutory exten­sion of the collective agreements was the period …

Memorial University Of Newfoundland Faculty Association V Memorial University Of Newfoundland, Innis Christie, Rick Mcgaw, Gerard Mcdonald

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties for the period April 1, 1988 - March 31, 1991 in that the Employer is in violation of Article 16 and other relevant articles in not paying Academic Staff Members at their Y-value (salary scale placement) as revised by the Salary Parity Committee. The Union requests compensation for all members who have not been paid in accordance with the Collective Agreement.

At the outset of the hearings prior to the preliminary award in this matter counsel for the parties agree that this arbitration board is properly constituted and properly …

The Preclusive Effect Of Unemployment Compensation Determinations In Subsequent Litigation: A Federal Solution, Ann C. Hodges

Law Faculty Publications

This article examines the use of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of statutory and common law actions challenging employee discharge based on determinations in unemployment compensation proceedings. First, the article reviews the history of the doctrine of collateral estoppel and examines the policies underlying its application. Next, the article reviews unemployment compensation law and analyzes the cases that have considered whether unemployment compensation determinations have preclusive effect in later litigation. After examining the existing law, the article engages in a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of according preclusive effect to unemployment compensation determinations, in light …

State Taxation Of Nonresidents' Pension Income, Walter Hellerstein

Scholarly Works

This article examines the issues raised by the efforts of some states to tax the pension income of their former residents and of the proposed congressional legislation to forbid such taxation. While there may be sound policy reasons for forbidding state taxation of nonresident pension income, they have yet to emerge clearly from the rhetoric that has thus far dominated the debate over the pension tax issue. The goal of the article is to examine the questions raised by the controversy over state taxation of nonresident pensions in the hope that dispassionate analysis of the problem may contribute to a …

Testimony Of J. Clay Smith, Jr., In Support Of The Nomination Of Professor Madeijyn C. Squire For Reappointment As A Public Member Of' The Public Employee Relations Board, J. Clay Smith Jr.

Selected Speeches

No abstract provided.

The Legacy Of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension Between Individual Employment Rights And The New Deal Collective Bargaining System, Katherine V.W. Stone

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court And The Duty Of Fair Representation, Martin H. Malin

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (105-88-00646), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the expiry date 31-07-89 but kept in force by legislation, and in particular of Article 11.07, in that the Grievor was wrongly refused modified duties and forced to go on sick leave. The Union requests an order that the Grievor be returned to work in accordance with Article 11.07 and that he be granted full redress for all lost rights earnings and benefits, including sick leave credits.

Re St Vincent's Guest House And Cupe, Loc 1082, Innis Christie, M Tynes, Donald H. Mcdougall

Innis Christie Collection

The union alleges that the employer breached the collective agreement between the parties effective January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1990, and in particular art. 13.01, Seniority. The union requests that the grievor be granted the position in question and compensated for any lost income which resulted from the alleged breach.

The Silenced Majority: Martin V. Wilks And The Legislative Response, Susan Grover

Faculty Publications

An American worker finds himself disadvantaged by an employer's affirmative action program. The worker heads for the courthouse, reverse discrimination complaint in hand. Will he be allowed to sue? Prior to the Supreme Court's 1989 Martin v. Wilks decision, the answer to that question tended to be "no." Wilks changed the answer to an emphatic ·yes." With the 1991 Civil Rights Act, the answer has become "probably not." This article discusses the bar against such challenges as developed through case law and recent congressional action. It addresses the implications that the new statutory bar will have for the structure of …

Patriarchy, Paternalism, And The Masks Of Fetal Protection., A. Kimberley Dayton

Faculty Scholarship

This essay is a response to John Kennedy's defense of Johnson Controls, Inc.'s fetal protection policy which was struck down last year in International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. A unanimous Supreme Court held in the case that the policy, which excluded women from a "fetotoxic" workplace, violated the federal employment discrimination laws. The Court's decision was issued only a day before Kennedy was scheduled to debate the issue of whether Title VII bars fetal protection policies with Professor Elinor Schroeder at the Kansas Journal's first symposium on March 21-22. 1991. The Court's decision rendered the technical statutory issues …

Reports, Awards, And Opinions 1992-1, Eric J. Schmertz

Eric J. Schmertz Selected Reports, Awards and Opinions, 1967-2006 Special Collection

Documents include arbitration awards and decisions written by Eric J. Schmertz as arbitrator of labor disputes between workers and management of Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, Eaton Corporation Bethlehem Assembly Plant, and General Electric Company, among others.

Reports, Awards, And Opinions 1992-3, Eric J. Schmertz

Eric J. Schmertz Selected Reports, Awards and Opinions, 1967-2006 Special Collection

Documents include arbitration awards and decisions written by Eric J. Schmertz as arbitrator of labor disputes between workers and management of The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Trans World Airlines, and members of United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO.

Reports, Awards, And Opinions 1992-2, Eric J. Schmertz

Eric J. Schmertz Selected Reports, Awards and Opinions, 1967-2006 Special Collection

Document includes the Report to the President by Emergency Board No. 221 concerning the investigation of a dispute between Consolidated Rail Corporation and its employees represented by the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes. The Emergency Board was established pursuant to Executive Order No. 12795 Dated March 31, 1992 and Section 10 of The Railway Labor Act, as Amended.

Annual Report To The Legislature 1991-1992, Agricultural Labor Relations Board

California Agencies

No abstract provided.

The Model Employment Termination Act: Fairness For Employees And Employers Alike, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Articles

The Model Employment Termination Act (META), which state legislatures are expected to consider in the near future aims to prevent the unfair firing of Amer~ ican workers. At the same time, the Act aims to prevent devastating financial blows to American business. For both employees and employers, META offers streamlined dispute resolution procedures that would be simpler, less costly, and less time-consuming than the civil courts. The essence of the proposal is compromise-not as a matter of political expediency but as a practical, balanced accommodation of the competing worthwhile interests of employers and employees. Workers are entitled to be free …

Conducting Informal Discovery Of A Party's Former Employees: Legal And Ethical Concerns And Constraints, Susan J. Becker

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

This Article identifies and critiques existing sources of confusion in the law and proposes revised and alternative discovery procedures to provide equal access to information possessed by ex-employees, while simultaneously safeguarding the integrity of that information. Its primary emphasis is on federal jurisprudence, although important points of consensus and departure between state and federal law are noted, as appropriate. Part I explains the issues that arise in informal discovery, and the difficulties with clearly resolving those issues given the conflicting state of the law. Part II discusses application of the attorney-client privilege to communications between corporate counsel and former employees, …

The Reasonable Woman And The Ordinary Man, Carol Sanger

Faculty Scholarship

Nineteen ninety-one was a seismic year for sexual harassment. The first localized shift occurred in January, when the Ninth Circuit established that the standard by which sexual harassment in the workplace would be judged was no longer the reasonable man or even the reasonable person but rather the reasonable woman. In October a larger audience felt a much stronger jolt when Anita Hill spoke before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Hill testified that Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her while she worked for him at the Department of Education and at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Her testimony …

Labor, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Book Chapters

Labor relations present three principal kinds of constitutional issues. First, to what extent does the first amendment protect employees’ efforts to organize labor unions and solicit support, and to what extent does it limit the power of unions over their members? Second, how does the doctrine of federal preemption restrict the states in regulating union and management activities? Third, what due process guarantees may employers and employees invoke in response to federal and state laws establishing new substantive rules and remedies in employment? Although the Supreme Court has never squarely?

Fifty Jurisdictions In Search Of A Standard: The Covenant Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing In The Employment Context, Monique C. Lillard

Articles

No abstract provided.

Interviewing In A Changing World: How To Conduct A Pre-Employment Interview Within The Bounds Of The Law, Maureen Laflin

Articles

No abstract provided.

A Bargaining Analysis Of American Labor Law And The Search For Bargaining Equity And Industrial Peace, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

What Can You Say, Where Can You Say It, And To Whom?: A Guide To Understanding And Preventing Unlawful Sexual Harassment, David Allen Larson

Faculty Scholarship

After an increase in visibility for sexual harassment cases in 1991, employers have had to treat allegations of sexual misconduct more seriously now that juries have the authority to award both compensatory and punitive damages. Many employers and employees remain confused, however, as to what conduct is considered unlawful sexual harassment. This article explains how courts have analyzed allegations of unlawful sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discussing what a court must find before it will impose liability. In response to the very real and immediate demand for a straightforward discussion of the …

Supreme Court Philosophy On Labor And Employment Issues, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Other Publications

It would not take a confirmed cynic to suggest that the title of this paper amounts to an oxymoron. That soft-hearted but tough-minded commentator, Florian Bartosic, and his collaborator, Gary Minda, came close to putting it in so many words: " [T]he Supreme Court lacks a consistent and coherent theory of labor law" (1982). My own view is somewhat different. First, lack of a consistent judicial philosophy is not all bad; at least it is better than a consistently wrong philosophy. Second, the vacillating theories of the Supreme Court tend to reflect the divergent attitudes of American society toward labor …

Union Raids, Union Democracy, And The Market For Union Control, Stewart J. Schwab

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

In this article, Professor Schwab compares the union member-leader relationship to the corporate shareholder-manager relationship and examines what can be learned from the voluminous literature regarding corporate control about problems of internal union democracy. Specifically, he questions whether a viable market for union control does or could exist that might induce leaders to act in the interests of their members. He analyzes the structural weaknesses in the market for union control and the legal factors inhibiting a union takeover market. Schwab concludes that a weak market does exist, despite the nonprofit nature of unions that limits the ability of leaders …

Doctrinal Synergies And Liberal Dilemmas: The Case Of The Yellow-Dog Contract, Barry Cushman

Journal Articles

The three decades spanning the years 1908 to 1937 saw a remarkable transformation of the Supreme Court's jurisprudence concerning the rights of workers to organize. In 1908, the Court held that a federal law prohibiting employers from discharging an employee because of his membership in a labor union violated the liberty of contract secured to the employer by the Fifth Amendment. In 1915, the Court similarly declared a state statute prohibiting the use of "yellow-dog" contracts unconstitutional. In 1937, by contrast, the Court upheld provisions of the Wagner Act prohibiting both discharges for union membership and the use of yellow-dog …

The Thomas Hearings: Watching Ourselves, Robert F. Nagel

Publications

No abstract provided.

The Continuing Availability Of Retaliatory Discharge And Other State Tort Causes Of Action To Employees Covered By Collective Bargaining Agreements, Peter Zablotsky

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.