Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gradually Developed Disabilities: A Dilemma For Workers' Compensation, M. Thomas Arnold
Gradually Developed Disabilities: A Dilemma For Workers' Compensation, M. Thomas Arnold
Akron Law Review
This article will examine some of these problems and attempt to make a few modest suggestions as to the direction future consideration of the compensability of gradually developed disabilities should take.
Exception To The Going And Coming Rule: Special Hazard Or Risk, Karen M. Holmes
Exception To The Going And Coming Rule: Special Hazard Or Risk, Karen M. Holmes
Akron Law Review
In Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co., the Ohio Supreme Court specifically adopted the "special hazard or risk" exception to the "going and coming" rule. This exception extends workers' compensation coverage to claims for injuries sustained in accidents occurring outside an employer's premises, before or after work, if the injury occurs because of a hazard created by the employment.
Workers' Compensation In Ohio: Scope Of Employment And The Intentional Tort, Donald P. Wiley
Workers' Compensation In Ohio: Scope Of Employment And The Intentional Tort, Donald P. Wiley
Akron Law Review
The purpose of this comment is to discuss the issues and developments in the intentional tort area. Although analogies are drawn from developments in other jurisdictions, the primary focus will be on Ohio decisions. As will be demonstrated, Ohio courts are now being faced with the following question: Is an employer protected from common law damages no matter how his employee is injured, or should he be "punished" by a common law action when he intentionally injures his employee? Within this query are many others: What is an intentional injury? Can the employee recover workman's compensation and common law damages …