Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (14)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
-
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
-
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Brian M McCall (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- John F. Stinneford (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Nehal A. Patel (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Rodger Citron (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Perbandingan Pengaturan Dan Konsep Bentuk Hukum Partnership Di Negara Brunei Darussalam Dengan Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Hukum Perdata, Dewi Mega Victoria
Perbandingan Pengaturan Dan Konsep Bentuk Hukum Partnership Di Negara Brunei Darussalam Dengan Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Hukum Perdata, Dewi Mega Victoria
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI
This study aims to find out and analyze the comparative legal form of the Partnership in Indonesia as stipulated in the Indonesian Civil Code Book with the State of Brunei Darussalam as stipulated in the Laws of Brunei, Chapter 106 Contracts. There are 5 points that can be examined from the rules in 2 countries relating to the Partnership, namely: Status of Legal Entity, Establishment of Partnership, Organ Partnership, Responsibility and Disbanding the Partnership. This is a reference to renew the Partnership regulations in Indonesia in the future with reference to the state regulation of Brunei Darussalam. This research is …
Ordinary Causation: A Study In Experimental Statutory Interpretation, James Macleod
Ordinary Causation: A Study In Experimental Statutory Interpretation, James Macleod
Indiana Law Journal
In a series of recent split decisions interpreting criminal and tort-like legislation, the Supreme Court has purported to give statutory causation requirements their ordinary, plain meaning. Armed with dictionaries, examples from everyday speech, and commonsense intuitions, the Court’s majority has explained that statutory phrases like “because of” and “results from” entail but-for causation as a matter of ordinary usage. There’s just one problem: The Court’s majority (and the many state and federal courts following its lead) is wrong on the facts—specifically, the facts about how people ordinarily interpret, understand, and use causal language.
This Article considers a novel approach to …
Keeping Up With Your Sister Court: Unpublished Memorandums, No-Citation Rules, And The Superior Court Of Pennsylvania, Logan Hetherington
Keeping Up With Your Sister Court: Unpublished Memorandums, No-Citation Rules, And The Superior Court Of Pennsylvania, Logan Hetherington
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
As Pennsylvania’s intermediate appellate court of general jurisdiction, the Pennsylvania Superior Court decides thousands of cases each year. The vast majority of those cases are disposed of via unpublished memorandums. These unpublished memorandums are designated as non-precedential and may not be cited by parties before the Superior Court. As a result, litigants and their counsel may not even persuasively cite an unpublished memorandum in briefs or other papers submitted to the Court. Thus, if counsel finds an unpublished memorandum deciding the identical issue of the case at hand and counsel is before the Superior Court judge who authored that opinion, …
Gandhi’S Prophecy: Corporate Violence And A Mindful Law For Bhopal, Nehal A. Patel
Gandhi’S Prophecy: Corporate Violence And A Mindful Law For Bhopal, Nehal A. Patel
Nehal A. Patel
AbstractOver thirty years have passed since the Bhopal chemical disaster began,and in that time scholars of corporate social responsibility (CSR) havediscussed and debated several frameworks for improving corporate responseto social and environmental problems. However, CSR discourse rarelydelves into the fundamental architecture of legal thought that oftenbuttresses corporate dominance in the global economy. Moreover, CSRdiscourse does little to challenge the ontological and epistemologicalassumptions that form the foundation for modern economics and the role ofcorporations in the world.I explore methods of transforming CSR by employing the thought ofMohandas Gandhi. I pay particular attention to Gandhi’s critique ofindustrialization and principle of swadeshi (self-sufficiency) …
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments, John F. Stinneford
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments, John F. Stinneford
John F. Stinneford
When the government wants to impose exceptionally harsh punishment on a criminal defendant, one of the ways it accomplishes this goal is to divide the defendant’s single course of conduct into multiple offenses that give rise to multiple punishments. The Supreme Court has rendered the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, and the rule of lenity incapable of handling this problem by emptying them of substantive content and transforming them into mere instruments for effectuation of legislative will. This Article demonstrates that all three doctrines originally reflected a substantive legal preference for life and liberty, and a …
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments, John F. Stinneford
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments, John F. Stinneford
UF Law Faculty Publications
When the government wants to impose exceptionally harsh punishment on a criminal defendant, one of the ways it accomplishes this goal is to divide the defendant’s single course of conduct into multiple offenses that give rise to multiple punishments. The Supreme Court has rendered the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, and the rule of lenity incapable of handling this problem by emptying them of substantive content and transforming them into mere instruments for effectuation of legislative will.
This Article demonstrates that all three doctrines originally reflected a substantive legal preference for life and liberty, and a …
Decorating The Structure: The Art Of Making Human Law, Brian M. Mccall
Decorating The Structure: The Art Of Making Human Law, Brian M. Mccall
Brian M McCall
Separation Of Powers Doctrine On The Modern Supreme Court And Four Doctrinal Approaches To Judicial Decision-Making, R. Randall Kelso
Separation Of Powers Doctrine On The Modern Supreme Court And Four Doctrinal Approaches To Judicial Decision-Making, R. Randall Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
Rodger Citron
No abstract provided.
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Echoes Of The Impact Of Webb V. Mcgowin On The Doctrine Of Consideration Under Contract Law: Some Reflections On The Decision On The Approach Of Its 75th Anniversary, Stephen J. Leacock
Echoes Of The Impact Of Webb V. Mcgowin On The Doctrine Of Consideration Under Contract Law: Some Reflections On The Decision On The Approach Of Its 75th Anniversary, Stephen J. Leacock
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
From Judging Culture To Taxing 'Indians': Tracing The Legal Discourse Of The 'Indian Mode Of Life', Constance Macintosh
From Judging Culture To Taxing 'Indians': Tracing The Legal Discourse Of The 'Indian Mode Of Life', Constance Macintosh
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In this article I consider how judicial decision making characterizes Indigenous peoples’ culture outside the context of determinations under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. I am concerned with how contemporary jurisprudence sometimes subjects Indigenous people to stereotyped tests of Aboriginality when they seek to exercise legislated rights. These common law tests of Aboriginality tend to turn on troubling oppositional logics, such as whether or not the Indigenous person engages in waged labour or commercial activities. These tests arose in historic legislation and policy that were premised on social evolutionary theory and were directed at determining whether an Indigenous …
Of Equal Wrongs And Half Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Peter Siegelman, Steven Thel
Of Equal Wrongs And Half Rights, Gideon Parchomovsky, Peter Siegelman, Steven Thel
All Faculty Scholarship
With a tiny handful of exceptions, common law jurisprudence is predicated on a “winner-take-all” principle: the plaintiff either gets the entire entitlement at issue or collects nothing at all. Cases that split an entitlement between the two parties are exceedingly rare. While there may be sound reasons for this all-or-nothing rule, we argue in this Article that the law should prefer equal division of an entitlement in a limited but important set of property, tort and contracts cases. The common element in such cases is a windfall, a gain or loss that occurs despite the fact that no ex ante …
Setting The Limits In Texas Construction Law: A Look At The Surety's Limitations Under Indemnity Agreements And Equitable Subrogation Comment., John C. Warren
Setting The Limits In Texas Construction Law: A Look At The Surety's Limitations Under Indemnity Agreements And Equitable Subrogation Comment., John C. Warren
St. Mary's Law Journal
To clarify divergent case law, Texas courts should adopt good faith as the necessary standard governing indemnity agreements. Texas court decisions limiting settlement of bond claims by sureties can be split into three categories: (1) those cases where indemnity agreements fail to vest authority in the indemnitee to settle claims or require a good faith standard; (2) those expressly stating indemnitees have authority to settle claims in good faith; and (2) those expressly vesting a surety with exclusive rights to determine which bonded claims should be settled. Under the first line of cases courts apply common law indemnity principles requiring …
Franchisor Liability For The Torts Of Its Franchisees: The Case For Substituting Liability As A Guarantor For The Current Vicarious Liability, John L. Hanks
Faculty Articles
The author reviews the justifications for applying the law of vicarious liability in the franchising context and concludes that its application is often inefficient and arbitrary. He argues that the employee-independent contractor dichotomy used by courts to determine franchisor liability is not well-suited to franchising, where the relationship encompasses both concepts. He proposes that vicarious liability not be applied in the franchising context. Instead, the courts by case law or state legislatures by statute should impose a guarantor status on franchisors that would expose them to liability for the torts of the franchisees only if the franchisee was unavailable to …
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
Overview Of The Role Of Precedent In The Legal System Of The United States, Ana Elena Fierro
LLM Theses and Essays
Traditionally, legal systems have been classified as either Common Law or Civil Law; scholars distinguish these systems based on their origins, as well their attitudes towards stare decisis. Common law considers precedent as a source of binding rules, while civil law does not. However, some scholars consider the methods for legal reasoning to be almost the same in every legal system. These scholars maintain that regardless of the source of law in a particular country, once a judge determines that the facts of one case are similar to those regulated by a certain rule, the judge will apply that particular …
The Development Of Common Law Defamation Privileges: From Communitarian Society To Market Society, M. M. Slaughter
The Development Of Common Law Defamation Privileges: From Communitarian Society To Market Society, M. M. Slaughter
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Open Justice In A Closed Legal System?, Bernhard Schlink
Open Justice In A Closed Legal System?, Bernhard Schlink
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment On Fenves And Heller, M. M. Slaughter
Comment On Fenves And Heller, M. M. Slaughter
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Legislative History In Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Treaty Approach, Malvina Halberstam
The Use Of Legislative History In Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Treaty Approach, Malvina Halberstam
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Professor Brudner's Crisis, Ernest J. Weinrib
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner
Hegel's Legal Plenum, Arthur J. Jacobson
Hegelian Vanity, Common Law Humility: On Legal Theory, Its Expression, And Its Criticism, Thomas M. Eisele
Hegelian Vanity, Common Law Humility: On Legal Theory, Its Expression, And Its Criticism, Thomas M. Eisele
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comment On "Hegel's Legal Plenum", Agnes Heller
A Comment On "Hegel's Legal Plenum", Agnes Heller
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Rules Against Corporate Privacy Rights: Some Conceptual Quandries For The Common Law, Anita L. Allen
Rethinking The Rules Against Corporate Privacy Rights: Some Conceptual Quandries For The Common Law, Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Sanctuary: The Legal Institution In England, Steven Pope
Sanctuary: The Legal Institution In England, Steven Pope
Seattle University Law Review
This Article discusses the institution of sanctuary that was recognized under the Common Law of England from at least the early Middle Ages until the Jacobean period, that is, from about the seventh to the seventeenth centuries A.D. This Article does not include a specific discussion of the modern American idea of sanctuary as the term is applied to the act of aiding an alien to remain illegally in the United States to escape political persecution in the alien’s own country. However, a consideration of the historical institution of sanctuary may shed light on the contemporary issue in two ways. …
Press Privacy And Malice: Reflections On New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Irving R. Kaufman
Press Privacy And Malice: Reflections On New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Irving R. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Do Bad Fences Make Bad Neighbors In New York After Scurti V. City Of New York?, David A. Zarett
Do Bad Fences Make Bad Neighbors In New York After Scurti V. City Of New York?, David A. Zarett
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor D'Amato On Law And Custom: A Rejoinder, Ernest Nagel
Professor D'Amato On Law And Custom: A Rejoinder, Ernest Nagel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.