Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Collaboration; Collaborators; Post-Conflict; Armed Conflict; Second World War; Criminal; Trial; Retribution; Non-Retroactivity; Criminal Justice; Truth Commissions; Persecution; Revenge; Allegiance; Duress; International Law; Citizenship; Quisling; Allied; Vichy; Lustration; Nuremberg; Prosecution; Legality; Crime; Punishment; Victims; Rome Statute; Geneva Convention; South Korea; Norway; Germany; France; Timor-Leste; South Africa; Sierra Leone Nazi; Jewish Police; United Nations; Reconstruction; Rehabilitation; Reconciliation; Truth Commission; Amnesty; War; Capital Punishment; Peace; Coercion (1)
- International human rights law; therapeutic jurisprudence; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; mental disability law; sanism; Americans with Disabilities Act; CRPD; ADA (1)
- Supreme Court; Windsor; Obergefell; marriage equality; Trump Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Coming To Terms With Wartime Collaboration: Post-Conflict Processes & Legal Challenges, Shane Darcy
Coming To Terms With Wartime Collaboration: Post-Conflict Processes & Legal Challenges, Shane Darcy
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The phenomenon of collaboration during wartime is as old as war itself. During situations of armed conflict, civilians or combatants belonging to one party to the conflict frequently provide assistance to the opposing side in various ways, such as by disclosing valuable information, defecting and fighting for the enemy, engaging in propaganda, or providing administrative support to an occupying power. Such acts of collaboration have been punished harshly, with violent retribution often directed at alleged collaborators during armed conflict, while states and at times non-state actors have prosecuted and punished collaboration as treason or related offenses in times of war. …
A Second Opinion: Can Windsor V. United States Survive President Trump’S Supreme Court?, Artem M. Joukov
A Second Opinion: Can Windsor V. United States Survive President Trump’S Supreme Court?, Artem M. Joukov
Journal of Law and Policy
This Article examines President Donald Trump’s recent recomposition of the United States Supreme Court and the potential effects on Windsor v. United States and its progeny. The Article considers whether the shifting balance of the Court may lead to reconsideration of Windsor, particularly via attempted exploits of the weaknesses in the standard of review applied to reach the decision. The Article will conclude that while revolutionary, Windsor lacked the doctrinal clarity of its offspring, Obergefell v. Hodges, and therefore may be at greatest risk of reversal by the increasingly conservative Court. In particular, the Court may rely on the conflict …
“There’S Voices In The Night Trying To Be Heard”: The Potential Impact Of The Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities On Domestic Mental Disability Law, Michael L. Perlin, Naomi M. Weinstein
“There’S Voices In The Night Trying To Be Heard”: The Potential Impact Of The Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities On Domestic Mental Disability Law, Michael L. Perlin, Naomi M. Weinstein
Brooklyn Law Review
This article carefully examines, through a therapeutic jurisprudence framework, the likely impact of the United States’ ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on U.S. society’s sanist attitudes towards persons with mental disabilities. Although the United Nations ratified the CRPD—the most significant historical development in the recognition of the human rights of persons with mental disabilities— in 2008, the United States has yet to ratify it. In this article, we consider whether the CRPD, if ratified, is likely to finally extinguish the toxic stench of sanism that permeates all levels of society. We …