Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (86)
- St. Mary's University (16)
- Barry University School of Law (11)
- New York Law School (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
-
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (21)
- Cases (21)
- Summaries (20)
- Constitutional law (11)
- Jurisprudence (8)
-
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (7)
- United States (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- First Amendment (6)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (6)
- Image (5)
- California (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Doe (4)
- FCC (4)
- Gonzales (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- NLRB (4)
- National Labor Relations Board (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- USPTO (4)
- Visual (4)
- Astrue (3)
- Baroque (3)
- CAFC (3)
- Chao (3)
- Common law (3)
- Department of Agriculture (3)
- Environmental Protection Agency (3)
- FTC (3)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (47)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (39)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (16)
- NYLS Law Review (9)
- Barry Law Review (6)
-
- IP Theory (6)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (5)
- Florida Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2)
- Marquette Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review (2)
- San Diego Law Review (2)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Louisiana Law Review (1)
- Maryland Carey Law (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 162
Full-Text Articles in Law
Legal Summaries , Emily Edwards
Legal Summaries , Emily Edwards
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Originalism And The Colorblind Constitution, Michael B. Rappaport
Originalism And The Colorblind Constitution, Michael B. Rappaport
Notre Dame Law Review
In this Article, I challenge the claim that the original meaning clearly allows the states to engage in affirmative action. I argue that the original meaning does not plainly establish that affirmative action by the states is constitutional. Instead, there is, at the least, a reasonable argument to be made that state government affirmative action is unconstitutional. In fact, based on the available evidence, I believe that the case for concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment’s original meaning prohibits affirmative action as to laws within its scope is stronger than the case for concluding that it allows affirmative action. I do …
Sotomayor's Empathy Moves The Court A Step Closer To Equitable Adjudication, Veronica Couzo
Sotomayor's Empathy Moves The Court A Step Closer To Equitable Adjudication, Veronica Couzo
Notre Dame Law Review
On August 6, 2009, then-Judge, now-Justice, Sonia Sotomayor was confirmed as the nation’s first Latina Supreme Court Justice. While many Latinos embraced the idea of having “Sonia from the Bronx” on the bench, others were fearful that her jurisprudence, combined with her background, would result in “reverse racism.” These fears, while arguably unfounded at the time, have been completely dispelled. Just as Justice Thurgood Marshall transformed the adjudications of the Supreme Court through experiential discourse, so too, to a lesser extent, has Justice Sotomayor. In both oral arguments and written opinions, Justice Sonia Sotomayor has demonstrated educative leadership—enlightening her colleagues …
A Modified Theory Of The Law Of Federal Courts: The Case Of Arising-Under Jurisdiction, Simona Grossi
A Modified Theory Of The Law Of Federal Courts: The Case Of Arising-Under Jurisdiction, Simona Grossi
Washington Law Review
This Article examines and evaluates the legal process method as a perspective from which to assess the law of federal courts. It then offers a modified approach to legal process that encompasses the full range of considerations that ought to inform modern judicial decision-making in this context. With that modified approach in mind, the article describes and critiques the Supreme Court’s statutory arising-under jurisprudence, both as originally developed and as currently practiced. The article shows that while the Court’s early “arising-under” jurisprudence was founded on durable principles and on the reasoned application of those principles, more recent decisions by the …
Separate Is Inherently Unequal, Unless You're Religious: The Peculiar Constitutionalization Of Religious Segregation, Franciska Coleman
Separate Is Inherently Unequal, Unless You're Religious: The Peculiar Constitutionalization Of Religious Segregation, Franciska Coleman
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
This article seeks to explain how a relative newcomer to constitutional anti-discrimination jurisprudence, secular identity, has managed to gamer a far higher degree of protection than historically suspect classes, such as race and gender. It attributes this phenom- enon to the "separate but equal" model of equality inherent in the doctrine of "separation of church and state." It notes that, despite acknowledging that government segregation is per se unequal in the Brown decision, the Supreme Court has continued to enforce religious segregation as a requirement of the Establishment Clause. In doing so, the Court has created a new type of …
Transforming Juvenile Justice: Making Doctrine Out Of Dicta In Graham V. Florida, Jason Zolle
Transforming Juvenile Justice: Making Doctrine Out Of Dicta In Graham V. Florida, Jason Zolle
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
In the late 1980s and 1990s, many state legislatures radically altered the way that their laws treated children accused of crimes. Responding to what was perceived of as an epidemic of juvenile violence, academics and policymakers began to think of child criminals as a "new breed" of incorrigible "superpredators." States responded by making it easier for prosecutors to try and sentence juveniles as adults, even making it mandatory in some circumstances. Yet in the past decade, the Supreme Court handed down four opinions that limit the states' ability to treat children as adults in the justice system. Roper v. Simmons …
Interpreting The Wisconsin Constitution, Daniel R. Suhr
Interpreting The Wisconsin Constitution, Daniel R. Suhr
Marquette Law Review
The Wisconsin Constitution is the state’s fundamental law and is often the final authority over important issues of public moment. When interpreting a provision in the state constitution, the Wisconsin Supreme Court relies on three primary sources: the plain meaning of the text, the legislative and ratification history surrounding the clause, and construction by the legislature. The second and third sources that the Court uses to resolve constitutional cases are significantly flawed for both practical and jurisprudential reasons.
By contrast, the Wisconsin Supreme Court focuses first and foremost on the text when interpreting statutes. The Court only turns to history …
Holmes, Cardozo, And The Legal Realists: Early Incarnations Of Legal Pragmatism And Enterprise Liability, Edmund Ursin
Holmes, Cardozo, And The Legal Realists: Early Incarnations Of Legal Pragmatism And Enterprise Liability, Edmund Ursin
San Diego Law Review
The theory of enterprise liability is associated with the tort lawmaking of the liberal California Supreme Court of the 1960s and 1970s. Legal pragmatism, in turn, is associated with the conservative jurist Richard Posner. This Article explains that early incarnations of each can be found in the works of four giants in American law: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Judge—later Justice—Benjamin Cardozo, and the Legal Realists Leon Green and Karl Llewellyn. As will be seen, these scholars and judges shared a common view of the lawmaking role of courts. Stated simply, this shared view was that judges are lawmakers and policy …
The Role Of The Federal Judge In The Constitutional Structure: An Originalist Perspective, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
The Role Of The Federal Judge In The Constitutional Structure: An Originalist Perspective, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
San Diego Law Review
Join me now in examining some of the structural features of our Constitution. And let’s do so by focusing upon cases that have come before my court—the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the second highest federal court in the land, inferior only to the Supreme Court of the United States. My goal is to present, in modest outline, an originalist perspective on the federal judge’s role, particularly my role as a circuit judge, in the constitutional order.
Climate Regulation As If The Planet Matters: The Earth Jurisprudence Approach To Climate Change, Glenn Wright
Climate Regulation As If The Planet Matters: The Earth Jurisprudence Approach To Climate Change, Glenn Wright
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
It is now beyond doubt that humans are having an enormously detrimental impact on the natural world. In the face of the incredible environmental challenges we face, new and radical ideas have emerged about how we should regulate human behavior. This paper briefly focuses on the failure of current legal regimes to address climate change, and considers how climate governance would look under the Earth Jurisprudence approach: setting our laws within the context of fundamental principles of ecology and planetary boundaries. Consideration is given to how existing legal concepts could be used to achieve this vision. The paper concludes that …
Land Ethic Under Attack: Keystone Xl And The War Over Domestic S(Oil), Heather Culp
Land Ethic Under Attack: Keystone Xl And The War Over Domestic S(Oil), Heather Culp
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
The Keystone XL pipeline has caused recent controversy and renewed the debate over the future of fossil fuels in the United States. The project pits largely conservative groups, who argue that the pipeline will create jobs and decrease America’s dependence on foreign oil, against environmental advocates, indigenous tribes, and private landowners, who are attempting to fend off the project because they believe it will displace them of their own lands as well as disrupt the natural ecosystems that lay in the pipeline’s path. In the wake of a presidential veto of the project and renewed sentiment by the pipeline’s …
Mapping The Terrain Of Earth Jurisprudence: Landscape, Thresholds And Horizons, Anne Louise Schillmoller, Alessandro Pelizzon
Mapping The Terrain Of Earth Jurisprudence: Landscape, Thresholds And Horizons, Anne Louise Schillmoller, Alessandro Pelizzon
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
This paper investigates central ideas in the emergent field of Earth Jurisprudence. It suggests that development of conceptual and practical frameworks for an earth justice system predicated on rights of nature is currently at a nascent stage, but such ‘creative uncertainty’ provides scholars and practitioners with opportunities to identify and articulate new conceptual frameworks which avoid some of the hazards of human exceptionalism.
Part I suggests that the concept of ‘rights of nature’ rests upon contestable epistemological and ontological claims and that an effective Earth Jurisprudence will require a continual negotiation of interpretative disagreements and frameworks for action.
Part II …
State Conservation As Settler Colonial Governance At Ka‘Ena Point, Hawai‘I, Bianca Isaki
State Conservation As Settler Colonial Governance At Ka‘Ena Point, Hawai‘I, Bianca Isaki
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
This paper argues, by illustrating, that liberal multiculturalism and natural resources are interlinked strategies of settler colonial governance in political debates surrounding the construction of a “predator-proof” fence for conservation purposes across Native Hawaiian lands of deep cultural and historical significance at Ka`ena Point, a state wilderness park in Hawai`i. First, this paper shifts debates framed in terms of the seeming recalcitrance of Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners to recognize the necessity of natural resource management. Second, it considers how these political debates are repeated in the context of legal questions over the forms through which Native Hawaiian cultural claims may …
Permitting Problems: Environmental Justice And The Miccosukee Indian Tribe, Charles Prior
Permitting Problems: Environmental Justice And The Miccosukee Indian Tribe, Charles Prior
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians is a federally recognized tribe that works and resides in the Everglades region of the State of Florida. The Miccosukee have been battling lax water quality standards through lawsuits since the 1990’s. Recent rulings in federal court held that the State of Florida has failed to comply with the Clean Water Act and ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to set nutrient criteria for the water bodies in the state of Florida until the Florida Department of Environmental Protection complies with the Clean Water Act.
This article uses the principles of environmental justice to analyze ways …
Lower Court Compliance With Supreme Court Remands, Elise Borochoff
Lower Court Compliance With Supreme Court Remands, Elise Borochoff
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Mindful Environmental Jurisprudence?: Speculations On The Application Of Gandhi’S Thought To Mcwc V. Nestlé, Nehal A. Patel, Lauren Vella
A Mindful Environmental Jurisprudence?: Speculations On The Application Of Gandhi’S Thought To Mcwc V. Nestlé, Nehal A. Patel, Lauren Vella
Pace Environmental Law Review
We attempt to engage modern legal reasoning with Gandhi’s thought. We hope to speculate on what jurisprudence would look like if it were more mindful of the concepts central to Gandhi’s thought. By using Gandhi as an intellectual anchor, we hope to take a step toward creating a more “mindful jurisprudence” that implicitly incorporates into its reasoning the needs of environmental stewardship, disempowered populations, and the poverty-stricken. Because Gandhi’s thought has been discussed at length in environmental justice campaigns, we begin this effort by examining the relationship between environmental law and Gandhi’s thought. Given Gandhi’s commentaries on exploitative and oppressive …
Statutory Interdependence In Severability Analysis, Rachel J. Ezzell
Statutory Interdependence In Severability Analysis, Rachel J. Ezzell
Michigan Law Review
According to conventional wisdom, when a court rules a statutory provision unconstitutional, it must sever that provision or strike down the entire statute. This understanding is incomplete. In practice, courts may engage in compound severance: invalidating additional, otherwise constitutional provisions of the statute without striking down the entire statute. They reason that the degree of interrelation between those provisions is so significant that severance of one compels severance of the other. As a result, a subset of the statute remains law. The power to craft such subsets raises constitutional concerns, and yet the jurisprudence concerning statutory interdependence is inconsistent and …
The Unwritten Law And Its Writers, Frederick J. Moreau
The Unwritten Law And Its Writers, Frederick J. Moreau
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Natural Law And The Ninth Amendment, Thomas E. Towe
Natural Law And The Ninth Amendment, Thomas E. Towe
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Inchoate Crimes Revisted: A Behavioral Economics Perspective, Manuel A. Utset
Inchoate Crimes Revisted: A Behavioral Economics Perspective, Manuel A. Utset
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Writing’S On The Wall: The Intent Requirement In Louisiana Destination Law, Marshall L. Perkins
The Writing’S On The Wall: The Intent Requirement In Louisiana Destination Law, Marshall L. Perkins
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses the intent requirement in Louisiana destination law which states that a party claiming predial servitude created by destination must prove the "intent" of the common owner to create the servitude. It analyzes the intent requirement entered into the jurisprudential application of Louisiana civil code and presents a relevant French doctrine on the issue.
Standing's Expected Value, Jonathan Remy Nash
Standing's Expected Value, Jonathan Remy Nash
Michigan Law Review
This Article argues in favor of standing based on expected value of harm. Standing doctrine has been constructed in a way that is oblivious to the idea of expected value. If people have suffered a loss with a positive expected value, they have suffered an "injury in fact." The incorporation of expected value into standing doctrine casts doubt on many of the Supreme Court's decisions in which it denies standing because the relevant injury is too "speculative" or is not "likely" to be redressed by a decree in the plaintiff's favor. This Article addresses this shortcoming in standing jurisprudence by …
Louisiana Public Service Commission V. Cheathon: Error Of Alj In Not Citing A Party For Contempt For Failure To Appear At A Hearing, Kevin J. Riley
Louisiana Public Service Commission V. Cheathon: Error Of Alj In Not Citing A Party For Contempt For Failure To Appear At A Hearing, Kevin J. Riley
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Logic Of Judicial Decisions - Two Items Of Greater Or Lesser Interest, Michael S. Moore, W. Barton Leach, David J. Agatstein
The Logic Of Judicial Decisions - Two Items Of Greater Or Lesser Interest, Michael S. Moore, W. Barton Leach, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Exclusion Of The Press: Herald Company Inc. V. Weisenberg, N.Y. Supreme Court Appellate Division -- First Department
Exclusion Of The Press: Herald Company Inc. V. Weisenberg, N.Y. Supreme Court Appellate Division -- First Department
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Unemployment Compensation: Lola A. Lind V. Employment Security Division, Department Of Labor, State Of Alaska - Supreme Court Of Alaska - March 14, 1980, Supreme Court Of Alaska
Unemployment Compensation: Lola A. Lind V. Employment Security Division, Department Of Labor, State Of Alaska - Supreme Court Of Alaska - March 14, 1980, Supreme Court Of Alaska
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases Of Interest, David J. Agatstein
Recent Cases Of Interest, David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Federal Court Interpretation Of Attorney's Fees Provision Of Equal Access To Justice Act As It Applies To Hearings Of The United States Department Of Agriculture: United States Department Of Agriculture V. Lane, Tamara Carnovsky
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Agency Determination Concerning Delegation Of Sovereign's Pipeline Eminent Domain Power To Public Utility Interstate Pipeline Based Upon "Public Need" Comports With Dormant Commerce Clause: Substantial Evidence Review Applied To Public Need Determination: Lakehead Pipeline Company V. Illinois Commerce Commission, S. Ellyn Farley
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Deferential Review Of An Administrative Agency's Decision In Federal District Court: International College Of Surgeons V. City Of Chicago , Karen L. Vinzant
Deferential Review Of An Administrative Agency's Decision In Federal District Court: International College Of Surgeons V. City Of Chicago , Karen L. Vinzant
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.