Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Jurisprudence

Journal

2001

Institution
Keyword
Publication

Articles 1 - 30 of 74

Full-Text Articles in Law

Normativity And Objectivity In Law, Dennis Patterson Oct 2001

Normativity And Objectivity In Law, Dennis Patterson

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold Apr 2001

Why Judges Don't Like Petitions For Rehearing, Richard S. Arnold

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

Petitions for en banc rehearings are rarely granted. A Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit provides a history and reasoning of the rehearing process and his personal observations on those petitions and processes in today's court.


Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin Apr 2001

Constitutional Revolutions: A New Look At Lower Appellate Review In American Constitutionalism, Robert Justin Lipkin

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

Judicial review allows the Supreme Court of the United States to perform revolutionary constitutional change. The United States Courts of Appeals could also be a vehicle for revolutionary constitutional adjudication.


The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo Apr 2001

The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

Federal district court judges have several mechanisms for controlling civil jury functions. One mechanism is the entry of judgment as a matter of law. Federal appellate courts are able to reverse and direct entry of judgment as a matter of law. This article examines the appropriateness of such authority.


Masthead, United States-Mexico Law Journal Mar 2001

Masthead, United States-Mexico Law Journal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Front Matter, United States-Mexico Law Journal Mar 2001

Front Matter, United States-Mexico Law Journal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Nafta Standards Regulation: The U.S. Perspective, Geri C. Word Mar 2001

Nafta Standards Regulation: The U.S. Perspective, Geri C. Word

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Panel Discussion: The Operational Realities Of Resolving Or Not Resolving Standards Disputes Under Nafta, Ralph Folsom, Jose Augustin Portal, Jimmie V. Reyna, Geri Word Mar 2001

Panel Discussion: The Operational Realities Of Resolving Or Not Resolving Standards Disputes Under Nafta, Ralph Folsom, Jose Augustin Portal, Jimmie V. Reyna, Geri Word

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Recent Decisions Of The Mexican Supreme Court Of Justice, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez Mar 2001

Recent Decisions Of The Mexican Supreme Court Of Justice, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Concentrations: An Analysis Of The Mexican Economic Competition Legal Framework, Rafael Valdes-Abascal Mar 2001

Concentrations: An Analysis Of The Mexican Economic Competition Legal Framework, Rafael Valdes-Abascal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Some Brief Comments About The Pre-Merger Notification Processes In Mexico And The United States, Alfred Mathewson Mar 2001

Some Brief Comments About The Pre-Merger Notification Processes In Mexico And The United States, Alfred Mathewson

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


A Comparative Review Of Regulation Of Economic Competition In Mexico And The United States, Santiago Gonzalez Luna Mar 2001

A Comparative Review Of Regulation Of Economic Competition In Mexico And The United States, Santiago Gonzalez Luna

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Landmark Cases Related To Proceedings Commenced By The Cfc For Monopolistic Practices, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro Mar 2001

Landmark Cases Related To Proceedings Commenced By The Cfc For Monopolistic Practices, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Public Offerings Of Securities In The United States By Mexican Companies: U.S. Securities Law, David Huntington Mar 2001

Public Offerings Of Securities In The United States By Mexican Companies: U.S. Securities Law, David Huntington

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Corporate Governance: An International And Mexican Perspective, Mike Lubrano Mar 2001

Corporate Governance: An International And Mexican Perspective, Mike Lubrano

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Comparative Perspectives Of The Regulatory Process, Santiago Gonzalez Luna, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Alfred Mathewson, Rafael Valdes-Abascal Mar 2001

Comparative Perspectives Of The Regulatory Process, Santiago Gonzalez Luna, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Alfred Mathewson, Rafael Valdes-Abascal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Public Offerings Of Securities: Mexican Law Issues, James E. Ritch Mar 2001

Public Offerings Of Securities: Mexican Law Issues, James E. Ritch

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Private Placement Of Mexican Securities: Mexican Law Issues, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa Mar 2001

Private Placement Of Mexican Securities: Mexican Law Issues, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Corporate Governance Assessment: Mexico, Antje Zaldivar Mueller Mar 2001

Corporate Governance Assessment: Mexico, Antje Zaldivar Mueller

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Insider Trading And Other Hot Topics In The Mexican Markets, Miguel Jauregui Rojas Mar 2001

Insider Trading And Other Hot Topics In The Mexican Markets, Miguel Jauregui Rojas

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Private Placements Under United States Federal Securities Law, Terrence A. Everett Mar 2001

Private Placements Under United States Federal Securities Law, Terrence A. Everett

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Capital Markets Issues And Corporate Governance, John E. Rogers, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa, Terrence A. Everett, David Huntington, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Mike Lubrano, James E. Ritch Mar 2001

Capital Markets Issues And Corporate Governance, John E. Rogers, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa, Terrence A. Everett, David Huntington, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Mike Lubrano, James E. Ritch

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Mexican Lawyers Going North And U.S. Lawyers Going South: Interstate Legal Practice, Nafta And U.S. State Bar Regulations, Michael W. Gordon, George Bermann, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Carlos Loperena Ruiz, William Macpherson, Stephen C. Nelson Mar 2001

Mexican Lawyers Going North And U.S. Lawyers Going South: Interstate Legal Practice, Nafta And U.S. State Bar Regulations, Michael W. Gordon, George Bermann, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Carlos Loperena Ruiz, William Macpherson, Stephen C. Nelson

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Mexican Standards Related Policy And Regulation, Jose Augustin Portal Mar 2001

Mexican Standards Related Policy And Regulation, Jose Augustin Portal

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


Corporate Governance: A Mexican Perspective, Miguel Jauregui Rojas Mar 2001

Corporate Governance: A Mexican Perspective, Miguel Jauregui Rojas

United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)

No abstract provided.


The Paths Not Taken: The Supreme Court's Failures In Dickerson, Paul G. Cassell Mar 2001

The Paths Not Taken: The Supreme Court's Failures In Dickerson, Paul G. Cassell

Michigan Law Review

Where's the rest of the opinion? That was my immediate reaction to reading the Supreme Court's terse decision in Dickerson, delivered to me via email from the clerk's office a few minutes after its release. Surely, I thought, some glitch in the transmission had eliminated the pages of discussion on the critical issues in the case. Yet, as it became clear that I had received all of the Court's opinion, my incredulity grew.


Miranda, Dickerson, And The Puzzling Persistence Of Fifth Amendment Exceptionalism, Stephen J. Schulhofer Mar 2001

Miranda, Dickerson, And The Puzzling Persistence Of Fifth Amendment Exceptionalism, Stephen J. Schulhofer

Michigan Law Review

Dickerson v. United States preserves the status quo regime for judicial oversight of police interrogation. That result could be seen, in the present climate, as a victory for due process values, but there remain many reasons for concern that existing safeguards are flawed - that they are either too restrictive or not restrictive enough. Such concerns are partly empirical, of course. They depend on factual assessments of how much the Miranda rules do restrict the police. But such concerns also reflect a crucial, though often unstated, normative premise; they presuppose a certain view of how much the police should be …


Miranda, The Constitution, And Congress, David A. Strauss Mar 2001

Miranda, The Constitution, And Congress, David A. Strauss

Michigan Law Review

Are Miranda warnings required by the Constitution, or not? If they are, why has the Supreme Court repeatedly said that the rights created by Miranda are "not themselves rights protected by the Constitution"? If not, why can't an Act of Congress, such as 18 U.S.C. 3501, declare them to be unnecessary? These were the central questions posed by United States v. Dickerson. It is not clear that the majority opinion ever really answered them. The majority said that "Miranda is constitutionally based," that Miranda has "constitutional underpinnings," that Miranda is "a constitutional decision," and that Miranda "announced a constitutional rule." …


Miranda'S Mistake, William J. Stuntz Mar 2001

Miranda'S Mistake, William J. Stuntz

Michigan Law Review

The oddest thing about Miranda is its politics - a point reinforced by the decision in, and the reaction to, Dickerson v. United States. In Dickerson, the Supreme Court faced the question whether Miranda ought to be overturned, either directly or by permitting legislative overrides. The lawyers, the literature, and the Court split along right-left - or, in the Court's case, right-center - lines, with the right seeking to do away with Miranda's restrictions on police questioning, and the left (or center) seeking to maintain them. The split is familiar. Reactions to Miranda have always divided along ideological lines, with …


Questioning The Relevance Of Miranda In The Twenty-First Century, Richard A. Leo Mar 2001

Questioning The Relevance Of Miranda In The Twenty-First Century, Richard A. Leo

Michigan Law Review

Miranda v. Arizona is the most well-known criminal justice decision - arguably the most well-known legal decision - in American history. Since it was decided in 1966, the Miranda decision has spawned voluminous newspaper coverage, political and legal debate, and academic commentary. The Miranda warnings themselves have become so well-known through the media of television that most people recognize them immediately. As Patrick Malone has pointed out, the Miranda decision has added its own lexicon of words and phrases to the American language. Perhaps with this understanding in mind, George Thomas recently suggested that the Miranda warnings are more well-known …