Law Commons^™

The New Dread, Part Ii: The Judicial Overthrow Of The Reasonableness Standard In Police Shooting, Kindaka J. Sanders

Cleveland State Law Review

This Article series argues that the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on excessive force from Graham v. Connor to the present has undermined the objectivity of the reasonableness standard. In its place, the Court has erected a standard that reflects modern conservative political ideology, including race conservatism, law and order, increased police discretion, and the deconstruction of the Warren Court’s expansion of civil rights and civil liberties. Indeed, the Court, dominated by law-and-order conservatives, is one of the greatest triumphs of conservatism. Modern conservatism developed as a backlash against various social movements like the Civil Rights Movement and spontaneous urban rebellions during …

The Roberts Court’S Anti-Democracy Jurisprudence And The Reemergence Of State Authoritarian Enclaves, Reginald Oh

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

This Essay argues that the Roberts Court has been a pivotal institutional player in destabilizing constitutional democracy. It has enabled states to freely pursue agendas that are authoritarian in nature. And because authoritarianism is contrary to core principles of the Constitution, the Roberts Court’s constitutional jurisprudence has no basis in the Constitution and must ultimately be rejected.

Instead of taking steps to block authoritarian legislation and promote a fair and open political process, the Court has issued rulings catalyzing and reinforcing the authoritarian impulses of the former Jim Crow states. The Roberts Court has engaged in judicial review reinforcing authoritarianism, …

Enforcement Of The Reconstruction Amendments, Alexander Tsesis

Washington and Lee Law Review

This Article analyzes the delicate balance of congressional and judicial authority granted by the Reconstruction Amendments. The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments vest Congress with powers to enforce civil rights, equal treatment, and civic participation. Their reach extends significantly beyond the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts’ narrow construction of congressional authority. In recent years, the Court has struck down laws that helped secure voter rights, protect religious liberties, and punish age or disability discrimination. Those holdings encroach on the amendments’ allocated powers of enforcement.

Textual, structural, historical, and normative analyses provide profound insights into the appropriate roles of the Supreme Court …

My Friend, Charles Reich, Hon. Guido Calabresi

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, Irving Dilliard, Stanley D. Rose, Walter P. Armstrong Jr., Reginald Parker

Vanderbilt Law Review

The States and Subversion Walter Gellhorn, Ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952. Pp. vii, 454. $5.00

reviewer: Irving Dilliard

==============================

Freedom through Law

By Robert L. Hale New York: Columbia University Press, 1952. Pp. xvi, 591. $7.50

===============================

The Group Basis of Politics--A Study in Basing-Point Legislation By Earl Latham New York: Cornell University Press, 1952. Pp. ix,244. $3.75

reviewer: Stanley D. Rose

================================

Richards on Insurance, Fifth Edition By Warren Freedman New York: Baker, Voorhis & Co., Inc. 1952. Pp. xxvii, 2692. $50.00

reviewer: Walter P. Armstrong, Jr.

=================================

The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions: A …