Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Boundary disputes (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Deliberate Indifference (1)
- Dormant Commerce Clause (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
-
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Eleventh Amendment (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Hon. George C. Pratt (1)
- Hon. Leon Lazer (1)
- Indifference standard (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Maritime jurisdiction (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Political theory (1)
- Professor Eileen Kaufman (1)
- Public Function Doctrine (1)
- Qualified Immunity (1)
- Schwartz (1)
- Section 1983 Litigation (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Symbiotic Relationship Doctrine (1)
- Tangible interest (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Congress Stopped Short In Amending The Law Of Venue In Patent Infringement Cases: Ve Holding Corp. V. Johnson Gas Appliance Co., Darin J. Gibby
Congress Stopped Short In Amending The Law Of Venue In Patent Infringement Cases: Ve Holding Corp. V. Johnson Gas Appliance Co., Darin J. Gibby
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Perank: Is The Uintah-Ouray Reservation ''Nailed Down Upon The Border"?, David R. Williams
State V. Perank: Is The Uintah-Ouray Reservation ''Nailed Down Upon The Border"?, David R. Williams
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maritime Jurisdiction And The Secession Of States: The Case Of Quebec, Jonathan L. Charney
Maritime Jurisdiction And The Secession Of States: The Case Of Quebec, Jonathan L. Charney
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In this Article, Professor Charney discusses the maritime boundary delimitation issues that result from the creation of a new state through secession. While the author uses Quebec's maritime boundary concerns as an exemplar, the issues discussed are not unique to Quebec. The author notes that one cannot predict the ultimate resolution of maritime boundary disputes precisely, but certain factors will often affect the outcome. These factors include the geographical configuration of the disputed area, the viability of pre-secession boundaries, historic water claims, the doctrine of uti possidetis, and basic equity. The author concludes that maritime boundaries are so vital to …
The Federal Courts In The Political Order: Judicial Jurisdiction And American Political Theory, James Hopenfeld
The Federal Courts In The Political Order: Judicial Jurisdiction And American Political Theory, James Hopenfeld
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Federal Courts in the Political Order: Judicial Jurisdiction and American Political Theory by Martin H. Redish
International Extradition: Issues Arising Under The Dual Criminality Requirement, Jonathan O. Hafen
International Extradition: Issues Arising Under The Dual Criminality Requirement, Jonathan O. Hafen
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cesena V. Du Page County: The Illinois Supreme Court's Exercise Of Equitable Jurisdiction And Its Potential Impact On The Attorney-Client Privilege, Amy Kushen
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Forum Selection Agreements In The Federal Courts After Carnival Cruise: A Proposal For Congressional Reform, Patrick J. Borchers
Forum Selection Agreements In The Federal Courts After Carnival Cruise: A Proposal For Congressional Reform, Patrick J. Borchers
Washington Law Review
Once the object of American judicial loathing, forum selection agreements recently have enjoyed a far more favored status. Forum selection agreements promote certainty in commercial relationships and reduce transaction costs arising from litigation of threshold issues such as personal jurisdiction and venue. In 1988, in Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh, the Supreme Court confused several central issues, including whether state or federal law governs enforcement in diversity actions, the mechanism for enforcing forum selection agreements, and the consequences of seeking to enforce an agreement by transferring the matter from one federal court to another. More recently, in Carnival Cruise Lines, …
Comments: Making A Federal Case Out Of It: Supplemental Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, M. Ashley Harder
Comments: Making A Federal Case Out Of It: Supplemental Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, M. Ashley Harder
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable Leon D. Lazer, Honorable George C. Pratt
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable Leon D. Lazer, Honorable George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.