Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Oy Nokia Ab v. The Ship "Martha Russ" 1the Trial Division of the Federal Court was faced with the issue of its power to authorize service of a statement of claim out of the jurisdiction. Before the court stood the plaintiff, Oy Nokia Ab, a Finnish corporation, and the defendants, the German registered ship "Martha Russ", her German corporate owners, E. Russ & Co., a second ship, the Dutch "Korendyk", and the latter's owners, the Dutch corporation Nederlandsche-Ameri-Kaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, N.V. Oy Nokia's claim sounded in both tort and breach of contract in that the defendants had allegedly delivered …
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Oy Nokia Ab v. The Ship "Martha Russ" 1the Trial Division of the Federal Court was faced with the issue of its power to authorize service of a statement of claim out of the jurisdiction. Before the court stood the plaintiff, Oy Nokia Ab, a Finnish corporation, and the defendants, the German registered ship "Martha Russ", her German corporate owners, E. Russ & Co., a second ship, the Dutch "Korendyk", and the latter's owners, the Dutch corporation Nederlandsche-Ameri-Kaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, N.V. Oy Nokia's claim sounded in both tort and breach of contract in that the defendants had allegedly delivered …
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Oy Nokia Ab v. The Ship "Martha Russ" 1the Trial Division of the Federal Court was faced with the issue of its power to authorize service of a statement of claim out of the jurisdiction. Before the court stood the plaintiff, Oy Nokia Ab, a Finnish corporation, and the defendants, the German registered ship "Martha Russ", her German corporate owners, E. Russ & Co., a second ship, the Dutch "Korendyk", and the latter's owners, the Dutch corporation Nederlandsche-Ameri-Kaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, N.V. Oy Nokia's claim sounded in both tort and breach of contract in that the defendants had allegedly delivered …
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Oy Nokia Ab v. The Ship "Martha Russ" 1the Trial Division of the Federal Court was faced with the issue of its power to authorize service of a statement of claim out of the jurisdiction. Before the court stood the plaintiff, Oy Nokia Ab, a Finnish corporation, and the defendants, the German registered ship "Martha Russ", her German corporate owners, E. Russ & Co., a second ship, the Dutch "Korendyk", and the latter's owners, the Dutch corporation Nederlandsche-Ameri-Kaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, N.V. Oy Nokia's claim sounded in both tort and breach of contract in that the defendants had allegedly delivered …
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Oy Nokia And Order Xi: Notes On Unstructured Bases Of Jurisdiction, Michael T. Hertz
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Oy Nokia Ab v. The Ship "Martha Russ" 1the Trial Division of the Federal Court was faced with the issue of its power to authorize service of a statement of claim out of the jurisdiction. Before the court stood the plaintiff, Oy Nokia Ab, a Finnish corporation, and the defendants, the German registered ship "Martha Russ", her German corporate owners, E. Russ & Co., a second ship, the Dutch "Korendyk", and the latter's owners, the Dutch corporation Nederlandsche-Ameri-Kaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, N.V. Oy Nokia's claim sounded in both tort and breach of contract in that the defendants had allegedly delivered …