Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federal Procedure - Venue - Right Of Alien Under Diversity Of Citizenship Clause Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (A), Richard M. Adams
Federal Procedure - Venue - Right Of Alien Under Diversity Of Citizenship Clause Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (A), Richard M. Adams
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a citizen of France and resident of New York City, sought a declaratory judgment and restraining order against several defendants residing in different states. On the theory that a suit involving a citizen of France and citizens of the United States constituted "diversity of citizenship" under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (a), and therefore could be brought where all of the plaintiffs or all of the defendants resided, the action was laid in the federal district court of New York where the plaintiff resided. Defendant moved for dismissal on the ground that this was "alienage," not "diversity of citizenship" as …
Federal Procedure-Venue Of Corporations-Applicability Of 28 U.S.C. §1391(C) To Plaintiff Corporations, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed.
Federal Procedure-Venue Of Corporations-Applicability Of 28 U.S.C. §1391(C) To Plaintiff Corporations, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of a Delaware corporation, brought a contract action based on diversity of citizenship in an Ohio district court. Defendant is a partnership, whose partners are all residents of states other than Delaware. Defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground that venue was improperly laid. The court, relying on 28 U.S.C. §139I(c), held: motion to dismiss overruled. "Since the district where plaintiff is doing business . . . is the 'residence of the corporation for venue purposes,' this action may be properly maintained here [Ohio].'' Hadden v. Barrow, Wade, Guthrie & Co., (D.C. …
Federal Courts-Venue-Transfer To A More Convenient Forum Under Title 28, United States Code, Section 1404(A), Nolan W. Carson S. Ed.
Federal Courts-Venue-Transfer To A More Convenient Forum Under Title 28, United States Code, Section 1404(A), Nolan W. Carson S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
A cause of action based on diversity of citizenship was brought in a United States District Court in Pennsylvania by a New York corporation against a Delaware corporation. Plaintiff joined a New York corporation as an involuntary plaintiff. Defendant then moved for a transfer based on forum non conveniens to the Southern District of New York. Held, this suit could not have been brought originally in the Southern District of New York since the present involuntary plaintiff, amenable to process in that district, could only have been joined as a defendant and diversity of citizenship would have been absent. …
Federal Courts-Substitution Of Parties By Amendment Under The Federal Rules To Correct A Jurisdictional Defect, Rex Eames S.Ed.
Federal Courts-Substitution Of Parties By Amendment Under The Federal Rules To Correct A Jurisdictional Defect, Rex Eames S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiffs, local officers of a union, sued to enjoin the national officers of the union from interfering with plaintiffs' union duties. Because the original complaint failed to show diversity of citizenship as a basis for federal jurisdiction, plaintiffs sought by amendment to substitute five nonresident members of the union as parties plaintiff and to change the action to a class suit. Held, the court had the power to permit such an amendment but, in the exercise of its discretion, it would not do so here. National Maritime Union of America v. Curran, (D.C. N.Y. 1949) 87 F. …
Federal Courts - What Is An Equitable Claim To Real Property Within The Meaning Of Section 57 Of The Judicial Code?, Charles J. O'Laughlin
Federal Courts - What Is An Equitable Claim To Real Property Within The Meaning Of Section 57 Of The Judicial Code?, Charles J. O'Laughlin
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, was the lessee of land in Kentucky. It entered into a contract with defendant lessor, a resident of the District of Columbia, to renew the lease. Defendant failed to carry out his agreement, and plaintiff" sued for specific performance of the contract to lease in the United States District Court for Eastern Kentucky, jurisdiction being based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff was unable to obtain personal service upon defendant, but obtained service by publication under section 57 of the Judicial Code, which authorizes the court to take jurisdiction and to allow service by publication in "any …
Courts - Federal Courts - Removal Of Causes - Amendment To Complaint After Removal Reducing Amount In Controversy To Less Than The Jurisdictional Amount, Robert E. Sipes
Courts - Federal Courts - Removal Of Causes - Amendment To Complaint After Removal Reducing Amount In Controversy To Less Than The Jurisdictional Amount, Robert E. Sipes
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant's timely petition the suit was removed to the United States District Court. Plaintiff then amended his pleadings by filing particulars of his claim which reduced the amount recoverable below the jurisdictional amount. On a writ of certiorari it was held that the jurisdiction of the district court was not defeated by the amendment reducing the amount claimed to below the jurisdictional amount. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 58 S. Ct. 586 (1938).
Federal Practice - Decision Of Questions Preliminary To The Convening Of A Three-Judge Court
Federal Practice - Decision Of Questions Preliminary To The Convening Of A Three-Judge Court
Michigan Law Review
Before the district judge can convene a three-judge court, two preliminary questions must be decided. First, is the case within the jurisdiction of the federal courts? Second, is the case one to which the three-judge statute applies?
Corporations-Right Of General Creditors, After Appointment Of Receiver In Suit Brought For Foreclsoure Of Mortgage Covering Major Portion Of Assets, To Have Receivership Extended For Protection And Eventual Liquidation Of Unmortgaged Assets
Michigan Law Review
When the affairs of a corporation become so involved that it is not able to meet its maturing obligations as they become due and it is necessary either that the corporation be reorganized on a more sound financial basis or that its assets be liquidated in an orderly manner, to the best advantage of its creditors and stockholders, it is customary, as a basis for such reorganization or liquidation, to have a receiver appointed of all the property and assets of the corporation. Such receivership is usually precipitated by the filing in the federal court of a bill of complaint …