Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Abortion (1)
- American Indian law (1)
- Appellate judging (1)
- Bureau of Reclamation (1)
-
- Cases (1)
- Citizen suit (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Contract (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Courts (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Debtors (1)
- Division of property (1)
- Docket No. 84-320 (1)
- Domestic relations disputes (1)
- Domestic relations exception (1)
- Economic studies (1)
- Engineering studies (1)
- Erie Doctrine (1)
- Federal Rules of Procedure (1)
- Federal common law (1)
- Federal court (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- Indian water rights (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Legal Positivism And Federalism: The Certification Experience, Paul A. Lebel
Legal Positivism And Federalism: The Certification Experience, Paul A. Lebel
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Why Professor Redish Is Wrong About Abstention, Michael Wells
Why Professor Redish Is Wrong About Abstention, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
Most critics of the Supreme Court's abstention doctrines have attacked the substantive merits of rules that channel constitutional litigation away from federal courts and into state courts instead. In a recent article, Martin Redish raises an interesting objection to abstention from a different perspective. He addresses the institutional legitimacy of the rules and contends that whatever their merits, rules like these should be made only by Congress and not the Supreme Court, for they contravene Congress' intent to grant federal courts jurisdiction over constitutional claims against state actors. Part I of this article describes the context in which the choice …
Quantification Of Indian Rights: Problems Of Proof, Harry R. Sachse
Quantification Of Indian Rights: Problems Of Proof, Harry R. Sachse
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
32 pages.
The Abortion Controversey: A Study In Law And Politics, Albert M. Pearson, Paul M. Kurtz
The Abortion Controversey: A Study In Law And Politics, Albert M. Pearson, Paul M. Kurtz
Scholarly Works
The Supreme Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which held that women have a federal constitutional right to an abortion, has generated considerable controversy. The abortion issue became politically significant in the 1960's, when, emboldened by the Supreme court's recognition of a constitutionally based right of privacy, activists initiated a series of legal challenges to the validity of state abortion laws. Their efforts finally succeeded in 1973 when the Supreme Court in Roe and Doe v. Bolton struck down as unconstitutional the Texas and Georgia abortion laws. For those who objected to the result in Roe, however, …
The Multistate Consumer Class Action: Local Solutions, National Problems, 87 W. Va. L. Rev. 271 (1985), Allen R. Kamp
The Multistate Consumer Class Action: Local Solutions, National Problems, 87 W. Va. L. Rev. 271 (1985), Allen R. Kamp
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction And The Japanese Defendant, Robert Peterson
Jurisdiction And The Japanese Defendant, Robert Peterson
Faculty Publications
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing the Japanese defendant into an American court. Much of the discussion is also relevant to service in other foreign countries. The article concludes with a recipe for the proper preparation of service of process which the Japanese defendant should find irresistible.
Litispendence Between The International Court And The Security Council, Theodoor Jh Elsen
Litispendence Between The International Court And The Security Council, Theodoor Jh Elsen
LLM Theses and Essays
The exception of lis pendens is an objection against the admissibility of the claim. The general power of the tribunal to hear the claim is not contested, but the special situation that a claim on the same cause of action is pending before another forum is alleged to preclude the tribunal from asserting jurisdiction. This essay focuses on the exception of lis pendens raised before the International Court of Justice or the United Nations Security Council when both organs are simultaneously engaged in the settlement of the same dispute.
A Call For The Repudiation Of The Domestic Relations Exception To Federal Jurisdiction, Barbara Freedman Wand
A Call For The Repudiation Of The Domestic Relations Exception To Federal Jurisdiction, Barbara Freedman Wand
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Ambiguous Independent And Adequate State Ground In Criminal Cases: Federalism Along A Mobius Strip, Thomas E. Baker
The Ambiguous Independent And Adequate State Ground In Criminal Cases: Federalism Along A Mobius Strip, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
Can A Tribal Court Be Enjoined From Exercising Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers Of The Tribe?, Richard B. Collins
Can A Tribal Court Be Enjoined From Exercising Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers Of The Tribe?, Richard B. Collins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Afterwords: A Response To Professor Hazard And A Comment On Marrese, Stephen B. Burbank
Afterwords: A Response To Professor Hazard And A Comment On Marrese, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Putative Marriage Doctrine, Christopher L. Blakesley
The Putative Marriage Doctrine, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
The classic putative marriage doctrine is substantive, ameliorative or corrective; it is designed to allow all the civil effects -- rights, privileges, and benefits -- which obtain in a legal marriage to flow to parties to a null marriage who had a good faith belief that their "marriage" was legal and valid. Most jurisdictions in the United States have developed equitable analogues to the putative spouse doctrine that provide all or part of the relief afforded by the classic doctrine.
If a marriage is declared to be null or void, that declaration is retroactive to the day that the null …
Taking Bureaucracy Seriously, Henry Paul Monaghan
Taking Bureaucracy Seriously, Henry Paul Monaghan
Faculty Scholarship
The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform can be viewed as not one but two "books." "Book I" (pp. 1-192), which reflects Judge Posner's well-known commitment to the interplay of law and economics, adds to the literature on the explosive and unremitting growth of litigation in the inferior federal courts during the last quarter-century. Noting this situation with alarm, Judge Posner seeks to identify the dimensions of the "crisis," to evaluate some current proposals for reform, and to advance some of his own. “Book II” (pp. 192-340) is quite different. Considerably less reliant upon law and economics, it addresses the substance …
Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Debtors: When May Creditors Sue At Home?, Gene R. Shreve
Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Debtors: When May Creditors Sue At Home?, Gene R. Shreve
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
When May State Courts Exercise Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Class Members, Gene R. Shreve
When May State Courts Exercise Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Class Members, Gene R. Shreve
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.