Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1)
- Associated Industries v. United States Department of Labor (1)
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. Fowler (1)
- Euclid v. Amber (1)
- Federal Employers' Liability Act (1)
-
- George Sutherland (1)
- Jones v. SEC (1)
- Limitations of the Police Power (1)
- Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo (1)
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. Department of Transportation (1)
- Powell v. Alabama (1)
- Pure Food and Drugs Act (1)
- Regulation of Administrative Agencies (1)
- Seaman's Act (1)
- State Board of Health v. Godfrey (1)
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1)
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board (1)
- VAPA (1)
- Virginia Administrative Process Act (1)
- Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission v. York Street Inn (1)
- West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standards Of Judicial Review In The Virginia Administrative Process Act, Mary Renae Carter
Standards Of Judicial Review In The Virginia Administrative Process Act, Mary Renae Carter
University of Richmond Law Review
Section 9-6.14:17 of the Virginia Administrative Process Act sets forth two standards by which courts may review the validity of a state agency's decisions. In formal rulemaking and adjudicatory proceedings, the statute requires an agency to keep a record of all evidence it receives and to make decisions based on this record. Upon review, a court will look to see if there is "substantial evidence" in the record to support the agency's findings of fact. In informal rulemaking and adjudicatory proceedings, the statute does not require an agency to keep an evidentiary record. If the agency has not voluntarily made …
An Unsuccessful Attempt To Restore Justice George Sutherland's Tarnished Reputation: A Review Essay, Gary C. Leedes
An Unsuccessful Attempt To Restore Justice George Sutherland's Tarnished Reputation: A Review Essay, Gary C. Leedes
University of Richmond Law Review
Justice George Sutherland (1862-1942) is the subject and hero of Professor Hadley Arkes's laudatory new biography. Arkes portrays Sutherland as a judge "who had found the ground of [his] jurisprudence in 'natural rights." Although history has not treated the Justice kindly, Arkes attempts to reverse history's verdict.