Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Biography (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Justice Sherman Minton (2)
- Opinions (2)
- Post World War II (2)
-
- Supreme Court Justice (2)
- Views (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Appraisal (1)
- Biography Jesse Carter (1)
- Can an Equitable Interest Held in Trust Be Transferred Wrongfully by the Trustee Free of the Trust? (1)
- Collateral Attack on Foreign (1)
- Corroboration of Confessions in a Criminal Case in Virginia (1)
- Court of Appeals (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Evidence admissibility (1)
- Ex Parte Divorce Decrees: A Virginia Case (1)
- Federal Trade Commission v. Gratz (1)
- Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Irginia's Drear Aridities: Its Rule of Perpetuities (1)
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Judge Martin T. Manton (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Bribery (1)
- Judicial Dishonesty (1)
- Judicial Misconduct (1)
- Judicial bias and disqualification (1)
- Jury of inquest (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The relationship of judge to jury in Michigan condemnation proceedings presents in many ways a merger of some of the problems and questions contained in the relationship of judge to jury in civil trials, and of court to tribunal in administrative law. Theorists as well as the practicing lawyer in Michigan and some other states" may well find in the development of the Michigan condemnation proceeding an interesting example of the growth of a procedure for adjudication, in a context of cross-fire between legislative ideas and judicial interpretation of a constitutional provision.
A Study In Perfidy, Allan D. Vestal
Elections, Alfred Harsch
Elections, Alfred Harsch
Washington Law Review
Covers primary and general elections for judges.
An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts
An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Appellate Review Of Federal Trade Commission Proceedings, David A. Nelson S. Ed.
Administrative Law - Judicial Control - Appellate Review Of Federal Trade Commission Proceedings, David A. Nelson S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
During its forty-five year life the Federal Trade Commission has gone through some difficult periods to emerge today as one of the fundamental instrumentalities of government in the regulation of business. Its vast powers and influence, well known to lawyers, will not be explored here. Rather, the purpose of this comment is to appraise the extent of control which the judiciary now exercises over the commission in its adjudicative functions, so as to offer some indication to the practitioner of the probabilities regarding the outcome of judicial review on an appeal beyond the full commission. The approach to be used …
Memorial Service For Justice Jesse W. Carter - Response For The Court
Memorial Service For Justice Jesse W. Carter - Response For The Court
The Jesse Carter Collection
"Response For the Court" by Justice B. Ray Schauer.
In Memoriam - Jesse W. Carter, Daniel S. Carlton, Leon Green
In Memoriam - Jesse W. Carter, Daniel S. Carlton, Leon Green
The Jesse Carter Collection
No abstract provided.
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, G. H. A.
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court (Pt. 2), Harry L. Wallace
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court (Pt. 2), Harry L. Wallace
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review And Party Politics, Wallace Mendelson
Judicial Review And Party Politics, Wallace Mendelson
Vanderbilt Law Review
It has been suggested that intrusion upon legislative policy by judicial review "is a consequence of that fragmentation of political power which is normal in the United States. No cohesive majority,such as normally exists in Britain, would permit a politically irresponsible judiciary to usurp decision--making [policy] functions, but, for complex social and institutional reasons, there are few issues in the United States on which cohesive majorities exist." When they do exist, as in the recent tidal wave of anti-communism, the Supreme Court is not apt to test its strength against them. Rather it practices a judicious self-restraint. Distinguishing between parliamentary …
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court. Harry L. Wallace, Harry L. Wallace
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court. Harry L. Wallace, Harry L. Wallace
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Foreward, William T. Muse
Foreward, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
The reception accorded the first number of the University of Richmond Law Notes, published last spring, has been most gratifying. It has encouraged the Faculty to prepare this second number, which also is being distributed to all alumni of the Law School through the courtesy of the University of Richmond Law School Association. There has been a modest volume of requests for copies of the first issue from non-alumni members of the bar and from many law libraries.
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Anthony R. Fiorette
Book Review, Anthony R. Fiorette
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Vern Countryman, Douglas of the Supreme Court, A Selection of His Opinions, Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1959