Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appellate judges (2)
- Aquifer recharge (2)
- Calibration (2)
- California (2)
- Colorado (2)
-
- Exhibits (2)
- Legal scholarship (2)
- Sensitivity analysis (2)
- Surface water (2)
- AWDI Proposal (1)
- Adjudication of water rights (1)
- Administrative declaration of an underground river (1)
- Administrative hearings (1)
- Alternative approaches (1)
- Anita Hill testimony (1)
- Anticipatory closure of junior wells (1)
- Appropriation doctrine (1)
- Aquifer issues (1)
- Aquifer-stream relationships law (1)
- Aquifer/stream relationships (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Array of expert witnesses (1)
- Artesian water (1)
- Artificial recharge (1)
- Attenuated impact (1)
- Balancing tests (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Burger Court (1)
- Cape Fear (1)
- Case preparation (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
The View From The Bench: The Perspective Of A Water Judge, Robert A. Behrman
The View From The Bench: The Perspective Of A Water Judge, Robert A. Behrman
Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)
9 pages.
Litigation In Texas Re: The Edwards Aquifer And Water Rights, Douglas G. Caroom
Litigation In Texas Re: The Edwards Aquifer And Water Rights, Douglas G. Caroom
Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)
18 pages.
Agenda: Uncovering The Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology And Policy In The 1990s, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference (1992), Colorado Ground-Water Association
Agenda: Uncovering The Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology And Policy In The 1990s, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference (1992), Colorado Ground-Water Association
Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)
Sponsored by Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law and the Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference, organized by the Colorado Ground-Water Association.
Faculty for the conference included University of Colorado School of Law professor Lawrence J. MacDonnell.
Nearly half the people in the United States rely on groundwater as their primary water source. As demands for groundwater grow, it becomes increasingly important for lawyer and technical professionals to understand the legal and hydrologic issues arising in groundwater development, use, and protection. These issues will be the focus of the Center's thirteenth annual summer program, June 15-17, 1992.
This …
The Legal Framework For Aquifer Issues, Douglas L. Grant
The Legal Framework For Aquifer Issues, Douglas L. Grant
Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)
20 pages.
Contains references.
Practical Considerations For Effective Use Of Expert Witnesses And Computer Models In Complex Groundwater Litigation, William A. Paddock
Practical Considerations For Effective Use Of Expert Witnesses And Computer Models In Complex Groundwater Litigation, William A. Paddock
Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)
14 pages.
Liberals And Balancing, Robert F. Nagel
Media Masala: Why Women's Control Matters, Sarah Krakoff
Media Masala: Why Women's Control Matters, Sarah Krakoff
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Thomas Hearings: Watching Ourselves, Robert F. Nagel
The Thomas Hearings: Watching Ourselves, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Writing For Judges, Pierre Schlag
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Publications
In this response to Professor Rubin, Professor Schlag argues that a prescriptive theory of evaluation does not free an evaluator from the bias inherent in his own pre-figurations. On the contrary, the belief that better evaluative criteria will advance the cause of fairer evaluation is itself an effect of flawed and unrationalized pre-figurations of conventional legal thought. Professor Schlag argues that the evaluation question and its attendant disputes arise from a more significant development--the unraveling of the dominant paradigm of legal thought, the decomposition of normative legal thought.