Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Rule of law (2)
- Campaign free speech (1)
- Circumcision (1)
- Empathy (1)
- Family law (1)
-
- How judges think (1)
- Integrity (1)
- Judge Richard Posner (1)
- Judge-made law (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial courage (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Judicial elections (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial selection (1)
- Justice Sonia Sotomayor (1)
- Measure for Measure (1)
- Medical ethics (1)
- Nomination (1)
- Realism (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Unrestrained: Judicial Excess and the Mind of the American Lawyer (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Closing Of The Judicial Mind, David F. Forte
The Closing Of The Judicial Mind, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Reviews of R.F. Nagel, Unrestrained: Judicial Excess and the Mind of the American Lawyer, Transaction Publishers (2008) and R. Posner, How Judges Think, Harvard University Press (2008)
Fathers, Foreskins, And Family Law, Dena S. Davis
Fathers, Foreskins, And Family Law, Dena S. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In the United States, a custodial parent has the right and responsibility to make medical decisions for one's child. But does that right encompass consenting for a surgical procedure for which there is little or no medical justification? What if the noncustodial parent opposed the procedure? And when is a child old enough to make the decision for him- or herself? How should a physician respond when asked to perform a surgical procedure when the decision is enmeshed in family controversy? These and other questions are considered in Boldt, a recent family law case decided by the Supreme Court of …
Reframing The Independence V. Accountability Debate: Defining Judicial Structure In Light Of Judges' Courage And Integrity, David Pimentel
Reframing The Independence V. Accountability Debate: Defining Judicial Structure In Light Of Judges' Courage And Integrity, David Pimentel
Cleveland State Law Review
The perennial debate over striking the right balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability largely misses the mark. The tension between these concepts arises only in the structural sense of the terms, i.e. the conflict lies in the structural approaches traditionally taken to protect independence and to enforce accountability. In actuality, our primary concern should be the judge's own sense of independence and her internal sense of accountability. These more subjective concepts--which may be termed “judicial courage” (for the judge who is willing to act independently) and “judicial integrity” (for the judge who is willing to hold herself accountable)--do not …
Aligning Judicial Elections With Our Constitutional Values: The Separation Of Powers, Judicial Free Speech, And Due Process, Jason D. Grimes
Aligning Judicial Elections With Our Constitutional Values: The Separation Of Powers, Judicial Free Speech, And Due Process, Jason D. Grimes
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note consists of five Parts. Part II traces the historical development of state judicial elections from the perspective of the Framers' doctrine of separation of powers. It shows that judicial elections were borne more of historical contingency than constitutional design. Part II then assesses the recent history of elections to the Ohio Supreme Court. It determines that Ohio's judicial elections share two problems with many other states: millions of dollars given to judicial candidates by special interests likely to appear before the court, and candidates' broad freedom of speech to earn the political and financial support of these special …
The Realism Of Judges Past And Present, Brian Z. Tamanaha
The Realism Of Judges Past And Present, Brian Z. Tamanaha
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article has a single objective: to dispel the notion that judges are deceptive or deluded about judging. These unwarranted assumptions about judges distort theoretical and empirical debates about judging. Ordinarily the participants in any activity are presumed to possess valuable insights about the nature of that activity. Owing to the assumption that judges are deluded or dishonest, what they say on the subject of judging is often regarded with skepticism, discounted at the outset.
On Empathy In Judgment (Measure For Measure), Kenji Yoshino
On Empathy In Judgment (Measure For Measure), Kenji Yoshino
Cleveland State Law Review
This article is based on a Baker-Hostetler presentation given by the author at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. The author compares the nomination process of Supreme Court justices and the conflict between empathy and rule of law with William Shakespeare's Measure for Measure.