Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judges (5)
- Clerks (3)
- European Court of Human Rights (3)
- Court of Justice of the European Union (2)
- Deliberation (2)
-
- English Publications (2)
- Immigration Courts (2)
- Justification (2)
- Bureaucracy (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Constitutional Court (1)
- Court Ethnography (1)
- Courts (1)
- Courts of Last Resort (1)
- Deliberative Theory (1)
- European Publications (1)
- French law and culture (1)
- Internal organization (1)
- International Court of Justice (1)
- International courts (1)
- Judging (1)
- Judicial selection (1)
- Language (1)
- Legal culture (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Opinions (1)
- Reason-Giving (1)
- Référendaires (1)
- Sociology of the Professions (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judges Or Hostages? The Bureaucratization Of The Court Of Justice Of The European Union And The European Court Of Human Rights, Mathilde Cohen
Judges Or Hostages? The Bureaucratization Of The Court Of Justice Of The European Union And The European Court Of Human Rights, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen
When Judges Have Reasons Not To Give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach, Mathilde Cohen
When Judges Have Reasons Not To Give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen
Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Deliberations: Two Models Of Judicial Deliberations In Courts Of Last Resort, Mathilde Cohen
Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Deliberations: Two Models Of Judicial Deliberations In Courts Of Last Resort, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen
L'Épreuve Orale. Les Magistrats Administratifs Face Aux Audiences De Reconduite À La Frontière, Mathilde Cohen
L'Épreuve Orale. Les Magistrats Administratifs Face Aux Audiences De Reconduite À La Frontière, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen
Reason Giving In Court Practice: Decision-Makers At The Crossroads, Mathilde Cohen
Reason Giving In Court Practice: Decision-Makers At The Crossroads, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen
According to liberal democratic theory, public institutions’ practice—and sometimes duty—to give reasons is required so that each individual may view the state as reasonable and, therefore, legitimate. Does the giving of reasons in actual court practice achieve these goals? Drawing on empirical research carried out in a French court, this Article shows that, in practice, reason-giving often falls either short of democracy or beyond democracy. Reasons fall short of democracy in the first case because they are transformed from a device designed to “protect” citizens from arbitrariness into a professional norm intended to “protect” the judges themselves and perhaps further …
On The Linguistic Design Of Multinational Courts—The French Capture, Mathilde Cohen
On The Linguistic Design Of Multinational Courts—The French Capture, Mathilde Cohen
Mathilde Cohen