Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Courts (6)
- Judges (5)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Decision making (2)
-
- Litigation (2)
- Writing (2)
- Analogy (1)
- Anglo (1)
- Anti-anti-evasion (1)
- Anti-evasion doctrines (1)
- Argument (1)
- Article 10 (1)
- Australia (1)
- Bias (1)
- Book reviews (1)
- Bridges (1)
- Briefs (1)
- Canons (1)
- Checks and Balances (1)
- Civics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Clear and present danger (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Cognitive dissonance (1)
- Cognitive fallacies (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Commonwealth (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
¿Es Posible Y Deseable Inaplicar La Jurisprudencia De La Corte?, Juan Luis Hernández Macías
¿Es Posible Y Deseable Inaplicar La Jurisprudencia De La Corte?, Juan Luis Hernández Macías
Juan Luis Hernández Macías
No abstract provided.
The Adversarial System, Three Lemons, And Cocaine: The Role Of Confirmation Bias, Curtis E.A. Karnow
The Adversarial System, Three Lemons, And Cocaine: The Role Of Confirmation Bias, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
A short note on confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance as it affects decision making by lawyers and judges.
Immigrants Unshackled: The Unconstitutional Use Of Indiscriminate Restraints, Fatma E. Marouf
Immigrants Unshackled: The Unconstitutional Use Of Indiscriminate Restraints, Fatma E. Marouf
Fatma E Marouf
This Article challenges the constitutionality of indiscriminately restraining civil immigration detainees during removal proceedings. Not only are immigration detainees routinely placed in handcuffs, leg irons, and belly chains without any individualized determination of the need for restraints, but Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the prosecuting party, makes the decisions about the use of restraints, rather than the judge. After examining the rationale for the well-established prohibition against the indiscriminate use of restraints during criminal and civil jury trials, and discussing how some courts have extended this rationale to bench trials, this Article contends that ICE’s practice violates substantive and procedural …
Comentarios Al Proyecto Sobre Justicia En Las Relaciones De Consumo, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comentarios Al Proyecto Sobre Justicia En Las Relaciones De Consumo, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comentario al Proyecto del P.E. Argentino sobre Justicia para las relaciones de Consumo (menor cuantía). Visión positiva del proyecto con algunas indicaciones prácticas.
Balancing The Scales: Adhuc Sub Judice Li Est Or Trial By Media, Casey J. Cooper
Balancing The Scales: Adhuc Sub Judice Li Est Or Trial By Media, Casey J. Cooper
Casey J Cooper
The right to freedom of expression and free press is recognized under almost all major human rights instruments and domestic legal systems—common and civil—in the world. However, what do you do when a fundamental right conflicts with another equally fundamental right, like the right to a fair trial? In the United States, the freedom of speech, encompassing the freedom of the press, goes nearly unfettered: the case is not the same for other common law countries. In light of cultural and historic facts, institutional factors, modern realities, and case-law, this Article contends that current American jurisprudence does not take into …
The Temptation Of Common Sense, Curtis E.A. Karnow
The Temptation Of Common Sense, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
The fallacies of invoking arguments from ‘common sense’ in legal briefs.
Impropriety’S Invisible Hand: Judicial Race And Gender Biases Within State Supreme Courts, Robert K. Christensen, John Szmer, Anthony M. Kreis
Impropriety’S Invisible Hand: Judicial Race And Gender Biases Within State Supreme Courts, Robert K. Christensen, John Szmer, Anthony M. Kreis
Robert Christensen
No abstract provided.
“Clear Beyond The Peradventure Of A Doubt,” Or, Plain English, Curtis E.A. Karnow
“Clear Beyond The Peradventure Of A Doubt,” Or, Plain English, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
The article urges judges and lawyers to write briefs and opinions in plain English. This outreach from the legal world to the public is important. As the public understands what courts do, the public will be increasingly supportive of the courts, more likely to comply with courts directives, and more likely to engage in meaningful debate concerning the justice system. In this sense, writing in plain English is a civic duty.
Conditional Release Under The Bail Reform Act: The Solution To Pretrial Detention For ‘Economic Harm’, Edward C. Nazzaro Mr.
Conditional Release Under The Bail Reform Act: The Solution To Pretrial Detention For ‘Economic Harm’, Edward C. Nazzaro Mr.
Edward C Nazzaro Mr.
This comment examines whether the language of the Federal Bail Statute and the threat of ‘economic harm’ is sufficient to take away the freedom of an accused person awaiting trial. The introduction discusses Bernard ‘Bernie’ Madoff and the conditions of pretrial release used by United States Magistrate Judges to allow Madoff to remain free until conviction. After introducing this concept with a high-profile defendant, the comment provides an overview of the Bail Reform Act and how it was changed in 1984 to include ‘danger’ as a relevant factor in pretrial detention matters, adding to the preexisting power to detain defendants …
A Free Lunch In Chicago, Curtis E.A. Karnow
A Free Lunch In Chicago, Curtis E.A. Karnow
Curtis E.A. Karnow
A discussion of the ethical issues implicated by judges’ acceptance of travel and related expenses when attending privately sponsored judicial education, including seminars offered by educational institutions.
Why The Judicial Electons Debate Matters Less Than You Think: Retention As The Cornerstone Of Independence And Accountability, Layne S. Keele
Why The Judicial Electons Debate Matters Less Than You Think: Retention As The Cornerstone Of Independence And Accountability, Layne S. Keele
Layne S. Keele
The judicial elections debate has once again claimed the national spotlight with the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. and with the 2010 electoral defeat of three Iowa Supreme Court judges who joined an opinion striking down Iowa’s law refusing to recognize same-sex marriage. Judicial election opponents generally criticize elections as interfering with judicial independence, while election advocates laud them as a means to increase judicial accountability. What can be overlooked in these debates, however, is that judicial elections are not the source of the threat to judicial independence—instead, that threat arises from re-elections, or …
Does De Jure Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation Of Explanations For Judicial Independence, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton
Does De Jure Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation Of Explanations For Judicial Independence, Tom Ginsburg, James Melton
Tom Ginsburg
The relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence is much debated in the literature on judicial politics. Some studies find no relationship between the formal rules governing the structure of the judiciary and de facto judicial independence, while others find a tight correlation. This article sets out to reassess the relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence using a new theory and an expanded data set. De jure institutional protections, we argue, do not work in isolation but work conjunctively, so that particular combinations of protections are more likely to be effective than others. We find …
Metaphor And Analogy: The Sun And Moon Of Legal Persuasion, Linda L. Berger
Metaphor And Analogy: The Sun And Moon Of Legal Persuasion, Linda L. Berger
Linda L. Berger
Drawing on recent studies in social cognition, decision making, and analogical processing, this article will recommend that lawyers turn to novel characterizations and metaphors to solve a particular kind of persuasion problem that is created by the way judges and juries think and decide. According to social cognition researchers, we perceive and interpret new information by following a process of schematic cognition, analogizing the new data we encounter to the knowledge structures embedded in our memories. Decision-making researchers differentiate between intuitive and reflective processes (System 1 and System 2), and they agree that in System 1 decision making, only the …
Anti-Anti-Evasion In Constitutional Law, Brannon P. Denning, Michael B. Kent Jr.
Anti-Anti-Evasion In Constitutional Law, Brannon P. Denning, Michael B. Kent Jr.
Brannon P. Denning
In a previous paper, we identified “anti-evasion doctrines” (AEDs) that the U.S. Supreme Court develops in various areas of constitutional law to prevent the circumvention of constitutional principles the Court has sought to enforce. Typically, the Court employs an AED – crafted as an ex post standard – to bolster or backstop a previously-designed decision rule – crafted as an ex ante rule – so as to prevent government officials from complying with the form of the prior rule while evading the constitutional substance the rule was designed to implement. Although AEDs present benefits and tradeoffs in constitutional doctrine, their …
Justice Stewart Meets The Press, Keith Bybee
Justice Stewart Meets The Press, Keith Bybee
Keith J. Bybee
Among the Supreme Court Justices who have articulated distinctive views of free expression, Justice Potter Stewart alone placed particular emphasis on the First Amendment's protection of a free press. Drawing upon the lessons of history, the plain language of the Constitution, the political events of his day, and his own personal experience, Stewart argued that the organized news media should be considered an essential part of the checks-and-balances competition between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government. Stewart’s emphasis on the special structural function of the established press placed him at odds with most of his colleagues …