Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ESI (2)
- Electronically stored information (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- ACLU (1)
- ACPA (1)
-
- Allison v. Aetna (1)
- Amburgy v. Express Scripts (1)
- American Federation of Government Employees v. Hawley (1)
- Analytics (1)
- And Mt. Gox? (1)
- And the Future of Legal Practice (1)
- Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (1)
- Arizona v. Gant (1)
- CDA (1)
- Carrillo v. Schneider Logistics (1)
- Caudle v. Towers (1)
- City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1)
- Clapper v. Amnesty International (1)
- Clapper v. Amnesty International and Data Privacy Litigation: Is a Change to the Law “Certainly Impending” (1)
- Communications Decency Act (1)
- Cotton v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (1)
- Cyber Security Active Defense: Playing with Fire or Sound Risk Management (1)
- Cyborgs in the Courtroom: The Use of Google Glass Recording in Litigation (1)
- DIY (1)
- DMCA (1)
- DNS (1)
- Da Silva Moore (1)
- Defensible Data Deletion: A Practical Approach to Reducing Cost and Managing Risk Associated with Expanding Enterprise Data (1)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1)
- Do-It-Yourself (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cover Letter, Allison F. Rienecker
Cover Letter, Allison F. Rienecker
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its Annual Survey issue of the 2013-2014 academic year. This issue is published in conjunction with JOLT’s Symposium entitled “Information Governance: A Comprehensive Approach to e-Discovery.” Since its founding in 1995, JOLT has strived to publish relevant legal articles at the forefront of the technological field. With this goal in mind, we are excited to expand JOLT’s respected discussion of e-Discovery to the emerging field of Information Governance.
Understanding And Contextualizing Precedents In E-Discovery: The Illusion Of Stare Decisis And Best Practices To Avoid Reliance On Outdated Guidance, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Keltie Hays Peay, Mathea K.E. Bulander
Understanding And Contextualizing Precedents In E-Discovery: The Illusion Of Stare Decisis And Best Practices To Avoid Reliance On Outdated Guidance, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Keltie Hays Peay, Mathea K.E. Bulander
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
But as precedents survive like the clavicle in the cat, long after the use they once served is at an end, and the reason for them has been forgotten, the result of following them must often be failure and confusion from the merely logical point of view.
The Tangled Web: A Case Against New Generic Top-Level Domains, Joseph P. Smith Iii
The Tangled Web: A Case Against New Generic Top-Level Domains, Joseph P. Smith Iii
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
If we had a reliable way to label our toys good and bad, it would be easy to regulate technology wisely. But we can rarely see far enough ahead to know which road leads to damnation.
Finding The Signal In The Noise: Information Governance, Analytics, And The Future Of Legal Practice, Bennett B. Borden, Jason R. Baron
Finding The Signal In The Noise: Information Governance, Analytics, And The Future Of Legal Practice, Bennett B. Borden, Jason R. Baron
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In the watershed year of 2012, the world of law witnessed the first concrete discussion of how predictive analytics may be used to make legal practice more efficient. That the conversation about the use of predictive analytics has emerged out of the e-Discovery sector of the law is not all that surprising: in the last decade and with increasing force since 2006— with the passage of revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that expressly took into account the fact that lawyers must confront “electronically stored information” in all its varieties—there has been a growing recognition among courts and commentators that …
It’S Time For Revenge Porn To Get A Taste Of Its Own Medicine: An Argument For The Federal Criminalization Of Revenge Porn, Taylor Linkous
It’S Time For Revenge Porn To Get A Taste Of Its Own Medicine: An Argument For The Federal Criminalization Of Revenge Porn, Taylor Linkous
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Throughout history, pornography and technology have enjoyed a symbiotic relationship, each playing a significant role in the growth and widespread success of the other. From the VCR and camcorders to the Polaroid camera and the Internet, the pornography industry has always accelerated the growth of new technologies, paving the way for these new services to be introduced into mainstream society. Most of these new technologies were appealing to creators and consumers of pornography because the new technologies brought an increased sense of privacy. For example, much of the success of the Polaroid camera is said to come from the fact …
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is pleased to present the first issue of the Twenty-First Volume. With its first publication in 1995, JOLT became the world’s first law review to be published exclusively online. It was with that original publication that JOLT established itself as one of the leading publications in the legal technology field. Today, JOLT has continued the bold tradition of publishing articles to further scholarship in areas of new and emerging fields that fall at the intersection of technology and the law.
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its third issue of the 2013-2014 academic year. First published in 1995, JOLT is the world’s first exclusively online law review. JOLT strives to discuss new and emerging issues that fall squarely at the intersection of technology and the law. With this goal in mind, we are proud to announce the publication of the following articles.
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present the final issue of the Twentieth Volume. First published in 1995, JOLT isthe world’s first exclusively online law review. JOLT strives to discuss new and emerging issues that fall squarely at the intersection oftechnology and the law. With this goal in mind, we are proud to announce the publication of the following articles.
Riley V. California: The New Katz Or Chimel?, Adam Lamparello, Charles Maclean
Riley V. California: The New Katz Or Chimel?, Adam Lamparello, Charles Maclean
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.
Clapper V. Amnesty International And Data Privacy Litigation: Is A Change To The Law “Certainly Impending”?, John L. Jacobus, Benjamin B. Watson
Clapper V. Amnesty International And Data Privacy Litigation: Is A Change To The Law “Certainly Impending”?, John L. Jacobus, Benjamin B. Watson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
On December 19, 2013, the retailer Target announced that unauthorized third parties had gained access to its customer payment information. While Target originally estimated that the security breach affected 40 million of its customers, a subsequent investigation revealed that anywhere from 70 to 110 million people—almost one in three Americans—may have had their sensitive payment information stolen. In response, the retailer offered free credit monitoring services and assured affected customers that they would not be responsible for fraudulent charges made with their payment information.