Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust Analysis After Actavis: Applying The Rule Of Reason To Reverse Payments, Benjamin Miller
Antitrust Analysis After Actavis: Applying The Rule Of Reason To Reverse Payments, Benjamin Miller
Benjamin Miller
Abstract In F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc. the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding the proper evaluation of reverse payment settlements under federal antitrust law, holding that they must be evaluated under a rule of reason analysis. However, the Court simultaneously created significant uncertainty by declaring that the lower courts were responsible for structuring the analysis. While a few cases are currently in the pre-trial phase, the only decisions relating to reverse payments since Actavis have been rulings on pre-trial motions—there have been no decisions on the merits. Given the intricate intersection between antitrust and intellectual property principles in these …
Dominant Search Engines: An Essential Cultural & Political Facility, Frank Pasquale
Dominant Search Engines: An Essential Cultural & Political Facility, Frank Pasquale
Frank A. Pasquale
When American lawyers talk about "essential facilities," they are usually referring to antitrust doctrine that has required certain platforms to provide access on fair and nondiscriminatory terms to all comers. Some have recently characterized Google as an essential facility. Antitrust law may shape the search engine industry in positive ways. However, scholars and activists must move beyond the crabbed vocabulary of competition policy to develop a richer normative critique of search engine dominance. In this chapter, I sketch a new concept of "essential cultural and political facility," which can help policymakers recognize and address situations where a bottleneck has become …
Understanding The Solution For Microsoft, Ivo T. Gico
Understanding The Solution For Microsoft, Ivo T. Gico
Ivo Teixeira Gico Jr.
Nesse artigo, o autor examinou a solução do caso da Microsoft, tentando responder as seguintes perguntas: Seria a Microsoft responsável pelo monopólio do mercado de sistemas operacionais e pela vinculação ilegal no mercado de navegadores? Qual seria a solução menos drástica e intrusiva que poderia solucionar todas as acusações? Teria o Judiciário encontrado uma solução equilibrada para criar a competção sem destruir a Microsoft? Que abordagem seria melhor?
In this paper, the author examines the issue of relief in the Microsoft case, trying to answer the following questions: Is Microsoft liable for monopolization on the operating system market and illegal …