Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Patent Act (2)
- Alexis de Tocqueville (1)
- Annual Survey of Electronic Discovery (1)
- Backup Tapes: You Can’t Live With Them and You Can’t Live Without Them (1)
-
- Bandag Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Co (1)
- Barton v. U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (1)
- Blogger Beware: Ethical Considerations for Legal Blogs (1)
- Blogosphere (1)
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (1)
- Chubb Group (1)
- Cleveland Bar Association v. Moore (1)
- Computer crimes (1)
- Convolve Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corporation (1)
- Devices for Medicine Inc. v. Boehl (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Due process (1)
- E-Discovery Amendments (1)
- ESI (1)
- Electronic data (1)
- Embezzlement (1)
- Eric Guttag (1)
- Eugene Goryunov (1)
- Federalists (1)
- Florida Bar v. Kaiser (1)
- Foulke v. Knuck (1)
- George W. Bush (1)
- Green v. Montgomery County (1)
- HTML (1)
- Hague (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Electronic Data: A Commentary On The Law In Virginia In 2007, Hon. Thomas D. Horne
Electronic Data: A Commentary On The Law In Virginia In 2007, Hon. Thomas D. Horne
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Information Inflation: Can The Legal System Adapt?, George L. Paul, Jason R. Baron
Information Inflation: Can The Legal System Adapt?, George L. Paul, Jason R. Baron
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Information is fundamental to the legal system. Accordingly, lawyers must understand that information, as a cultural and technological edifice, has profoundly and irrevocably changed. There has been a civilization- wide morph, or pulse, or one might say that information has evolved. This article discusses the new inflationary dynamic, which has caused written information to multiply by as much as ten thousand-fold recently. The resulting landscape has stressed the legal system and indeed, it is becoming prohibitively expensive for lawyers even to search through information. This is particularly true in litigation.
Silencing The Blogosphere: A First Amendment Caution To Legislators Considering Using Blogs To Communicate Directly With Constituents, D. Wes Sullenger
Silencing The Blogosphere: A First Amendment Caution To Legislators Considering Using Blogs To Communicate Directly With Constituents, D. Wes Sullenger
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Alexis de Tocqueville wrote that “every new invention, every new want which it occasioned, and every new desire which craved satisfaction were steps toward a general leveling [of society].” The changes wrought by the growth of Internet use reaffirm the truth of the statement. The Internet has created new opportunities for communication and expanded the reach of speakers more than any medium yet conceived.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the 2007–2008 academic school year. Our authors tackle a number of emerging issues in ways we think you’ll find especially interesting.
Managing Preservation Obligations After The 2006 Federal E-Discovery Amendments, Thomas Y. Allman
Managing Preservation Obligations After The 2006 Federal E-Discovery Amendments, Thomas Y. Allman
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The 2006 E-Discovery Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2006 Amendments or the Amendments) do not directly address the onset or scope of preservation obligations. As noted in the September 2005 Report of the Standing Committee of the Judicial Conference recommending adoption of the 2006 Amendments, preservation obligations “arise from independent sources of law” and are dependent upon “the substantive law of each jurisdiction.” However, the Amendments have a major impact on how parties must analyze and execute preservation obligations involving electronically stored information (“ESI”).
Blogger Beware: Ethical Considerations For Legal Blogs, Adrienne E. Carter
Blogger Beware: Ethical Considerations For Legal Blogs, Adrienne E. Carter
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Attorneys are, in a sense, their own gatekeepers. Like many professions, the legal profession is self-regulating.2 However, ethical and professional rules have always acted as the gates of attorney conduct – restricting and guiding attorneys in their professional actions. Ethical rules continue to serve this function when attorneys utilize the Internet to reach a larger community.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its first issue of the 2007–2008 academic school year. To start off the new academic year, our authors present new ideas on the age old topic of Patent Law.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Charlotte A. Dauphin
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Charlotte A. Dauphin
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
I hope you enjoy the third issue of the Richmond Journal of Law and Technology for the 2006-2007 academic year, our Annual Survey of Electronic Discovery. This is our first annual survey since the new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which at the time of this publication have been in effect for several months, that affect electronic discovery in several significant ways. The entire staff of the Journal has worked diligently to bring these articles to our readers. Whether you are new to the Journal and electronic discovery, or whether you are a long-time reader, you will …
To Mark Or Not To Mark: Application Of The Patent Marking Statute To Websites And The Internet, Eugene Goryunov, Mark Polyakov
To Mark Or Not To Mark: Application Of The Patent Marking Statute To Websites And The Internet, Eugene Goryunov, Mark Polyakov
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing any patented article into the United States, may give notice to the public that the same is patented, either by fixing thereon the word "patent" or the abbreviation "pat.", together with the number of the patent, or when, from the character of the article, this can not be done, by fixing to it, or to the package wherein one or more of them is contained, a label containing a like notice. In the event of failure so to …