Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

International Law

University of Michigan Law School

Book Chapters

Jus cogens

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Human Rights, Christine M. Chinkin Jan 2018

Human Rights, Christine M. Chinkin

Book Chapters

The legalisation and judicialisation of international human rights have founded arguments that human rights constitutes a sub-discipline of international law, a ‘distinct jurisprudential phenomenon’, indeed a ‘special law’, central to the anxieties about the fragmentation of international law. The human rights world is a very different one from that envisaged by the VCLT: the latter is an empty, amoral world where States have reciprocal dealings only with other States, where there are no people hurt by States’ actions and demanding reparations, no international institutions creating special mechanisms peopled by experts for monitoring and reporting and no non-governmental organizations (NGOs) demanding …


Sources, Christine Chinkin Jan 2010

Sources, Christine Chinkin

Book Chapters

This chapter outlines the sources of international human rights law that are listed in Article 38(1) Statute of the International Court of Justice: treaties, custom, general principles of law, and, as subsidiary sources, judicial decisions and the writings of jurists. The chapter also considers how so-called 'soft law' instruments such as resolutions of the UN General Assembly and the work of human rights expert bodies may also be regarded as sources of human rights law.


The Gender Of Jus Cogens, Christine M. Chinkin, Hilary Charlesworth Jan 2006

The Gender Of Jus Cogens, Christine M. Chinkin, Hilary Charlesworth

Book Chapters

Defenders of the notion of jus cogens often explain its basis as the collective international, rather than the individual national, good. On this analysis, principles of jus cogens play a similar role in the international legal system to that played by constitutional guarantees of rights in domestic legal systems. Thus states, as national political majorities, accept the limitation of their freedom of choice "in order to reap the rewards of acting in ways that would elude them under pressures of the moment." Among those jurists who accept the category of jus cogens, however, continuing controversy remains over what norms …