Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- International Law (3)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Customary International Law (1)
- Domestic application (1)
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (1)
-
- General Assembly Resolutions (1)
- Global Financial Issues (1)
- Grotian Moment (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Instant Custom (1)
- International Constitutional Moment (1)
- International law (1)
- Joint Criminal Enterprise (1)
- Legal Standards (1)
- Minority rights (1)
- Non-Governmental Regulators (1)
- Nuremberg (1)
- Public Institutions (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- State Actors (1)
- Torture (1)
- War (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
International Human Rights Law In Japan: The View At Thirty, Timothy Webster
International Human Rights Law In Japan: The View At Thirty, Timothy Webster
Faculty Publications
Japanese courts have become increasingly open to the use of international human rights law in the past two decades. This paper examines several of the key decisions that reflect the judiciary's embrace of international law, particularly in the areas of criminal procedure and minority rights. I argue that the judiciary has eclipsed the other branches of government as the primary disseminator of human rights norms in Japan.
On The Use And Abuse Of Standards For Law: Global Governance And Offshore Financial Centers, Richard K. Gordon
On The Use And Abuse Of Standards For Law: Global Governance And Offshore Financial Centers, Richard K. Gordon
Faculty Publications
Current trends in international legal scholarship have shifted from a paradigm of state actors working within recognized sources of international law to one that includes networks of domestic regulators that develop and implement best practices or standards on a global basis. The new paradigm can be seen in operation in the efforts by onshore jurisdictions (most of which are financial centers themselves) to restrict the activities of offshore financial centers. Onshore jurisdictions enlisted these regulatory networks, as well as key international organizations, such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and the International Monetary Fund, to advance new standards …
Seizing The Grotian Moment: Accelerated Formation Of Customary International Law During Times Of Fundamental Change, Michael P. Scharf
Seizing The Grotian Moment: Accelerated Formation Of Customary International Law During Times Of Fundamental Change, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
Growing out of the author’s experience as Special Assistant to the International Prosecutor of the Cambodia Genocide Tribunal in 28, this article examines the concept of “Grotian moment,” a term the author uses to denote a paradigm-shifting development in which new rules and doctrines of customary international law emerge with unusual rapidity and acceptance. The article makes the case that the paradigm-shifting nature of the Nuremberg precedent, and the universal and unqualified endorsement of the Nuremberg Principles by the U.N. General Assembly in 1946, resulted in accelerated formation of customary international law, including the mode of international criminal responsibility now …
Foreword: Lawfare!, Michael P. Scharf, Shannon Pagano
Foreword: Lawfare!, Michael P. Scharf, Shannon Pagano
Faculty Publications
Forward to the Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law's symposium "Lawfare!" 2012, Cleveland, OH.
Keynote Address: The T-Team, Michael P. Scharf
Keynote Address: The T-Team, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Torture Lawyers, Michael P. Scharf
The Torture Lawyers, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article recounts the story about how these four individuals intentionally cut off the government's primary experts on the Geneva Conventions, the Torture Convention, and customary international law from the decision making process. In doing so, they presented a one-sided and distorted view of U.S. obligations under international law that led to a widespread government policy and practice of torture. It also reveals how a trio of important Supreme Court precedents disrupted these plans, and ultimately swung the balance back in favor of compliance with international law.